The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: What if IJN Ise
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:59 am
Posts: 128
Location: Shanghai,China
Battlecarrier

Attachment:
调整大小 290_23956_0adbaceb38f7c6a.jpg
调整大小 290_23956_0adbaceb38f7c6a.jpg [ 54.49 KiB | Viewed 1519 times ]


Attachment:
调整大小 290_23956_1ff0e12e615bf94.jpg
调整大小 290_23956_1ff0e12e615bf94.jpg [ 54.19 KiB | Viewed 1519 times ]


Attachment:
调整大小 290_23956_9a75645fe00cd94.jpg
调整大小 290_23956_9a75645fe00cd94.jpg [ 47.17 KiB | Viewed 1519 times ]


Attachment:
调整大小 290_23956_75513aad4e4775b.jpg
调整大小 290_23956_75513aad4e4775b.jpg [ 47.79 KiB | Viewed 1519 times ]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: What if IJN Ise
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 188
Crazy enough to be real! :-)

Again, fantastic attention to detail.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: What if IJN Ise
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 1:57 pm
Posts: 1296
Location: Schodack Landing, NY
Able, can you comment on the build process for the Ise? I love all three builds, but this one grabs my attention and won't let go.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: What if IJN Ise
PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:05 am
Posts: 12
Crazy but inspiring, I would not have liked to served on it, capsizes as soon as launched :thumbs_up_1:

It looks like a deck from Ryujo, hullmix from threedeck Akagi and Ise?

I must say that this build gives ideas how to have fun with some of my older not completed IJN kits, some absurd Yamato ships or modified Nagatos or other ships from the Hiraga archives that gives lots of artistic freedom.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: What if IJN Ise
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:02 pm
Posts: 2350
Location: Herndon, VA
Love it, in spite of how utterly top heavy such a boat would be. The IJN may have just been crazy enough to try!

_________________
- Chris

1/700 Saratoga w/Pontos (Needs paint)
1/700 Potato w/Kurama (On hold)
1/700 Murdertorpedoboat Ooi


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: What if IJN Ise
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:01 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
PetrolGator wrote:
Love it, in spite of how utterly top heavy such a boat would be.
A lot of the IJN ships were top heavy ("cram in whatever you can & worry about keeping it afloat latter"), this and a disdain for anything "defensive" (ie: armor/damage control/repair) contributed heavily to the IJN losses to (in many cases) crippling but not lethal damage. The Ryujo for one (originally designed for a single hanger with around 15 aircraft, flight deck was raised to add a 2nd hanger to double air-arm, created excess top weight issues). Even their "special" type (Fubuki class) DDs were notoriously top heavy, especially the type IIs (Ayanami) which replaced the original 12.7cm/50 low angle "Type A" turrets with larger & heavier high angle "Type B" turrets, the reason the "Type 3"s (Akatsuki) were so much larger & more expensive. However, if this ship were built the same as other IJN carriers, with metal framed wood flight deck & large open hanger, then this ship wouldn’t be as top heavy as it looks. The hanger/deck structure wouldn’t be that much heavier than the 4 original armored turrets with their heavy guns. The main structural issue I see is the weight of the heavy pagoda offset to one side. This can be countered by internal ballast but that would add a lot of dead weight. The ship would be highly ineffective as a combat unit, getting into a gun battle would expose the unprotected aircraft facilities (& bombs/fuel) to enemy fire. The main gun barrels would likewise interfere with flight ops (massive air turbulence down the deck) & the weight/space would be better used for more aircraft/bomb/fuel storage. These are of-course the reason no true hybrids were ever actually built or used. That aside, I love the concept & with modern tech could be viable. Love the build, fantastic job! :thumbs_up_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group