The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Alright, its been a good long while so here's one I've had floating around in my note/sketchbook for the better part of a year and it's almost done now so here goes!

Quote:
The Night of the Appliance Luau

North Vietnam
March 18th, 1969 0232 Hours


"Mr. White to Ukulele, the crowd is all here."
"Ukulele copies. Will advise when fat lady is on her way."
"Copy, crowd is raring to go," answered the young radioman, his voice barely above a whisper. His twelve man special operations squad was arranged around him on the high outcropping. Their ghillie suits allowing them to melt into the jungle. This far north they weren't taking any chances. Their team leader laid behind a powerful, starlight spotting scope giving him an excellent view of the valley below them. Almost three miles away lay the reason for their two week trek into the north. Built into the side of an unassuming mountain was an arch of concrete and steel allowing for the passage of a key rail line to cross the valley and continue on into Laos. Tonight would mark its last night in operation, hopefully.

Desperate to choke off the supply lines into the North this target was considered too far behind the lines to strike, until recently. Tests had been conducted furiously on a new kind of guided weapon, one that was perfect for such a target. After some promising results were obtained in the deserts of southwest America, it was time for the real thing. An old Cold War weapon that had been surpassed by technology had been given a new lease on life. Carrying 3,000 lbs of conventional high explosive in lieu of its former two megaton nuclear warhead, the re-birthed Regulus II was shades of things to come. When the USS Hawaii (CBG-3) was commissioned in May of 1962 she was built was two launchers and magazines for four such missiles in their original guises. She never carried them in this form though as the project had been shelved months earlier. Her roomy above deck magazines converted to storage and magazines for torpedoes, their armored plating providing ample protection. Her launchers were removed and placed in storage ashore.

As Vietnam intensified and everyone was looking for ways to reduce to the high attrition for aircraft and crews The Navy had already found one solution; naval gunnery. Many cruisers and even battleships were returned to service or were given overhauls to extend their service. Their positive effects were quickly felt and a multitude of World War II veteran ships were once again plying the waves and remodeling an enemy shoreline. The troops on the beach wouldn't have it any other way and slept easier at night knowing the Navy's "dinosaurs" were watching their backs. The diminutive slight given by critics didn't faze their crews nor the troops they were supporting. In the days of fancy new jets, missiles and technology, there were something to be said for "old world" simplicity. Nothing could soften up a beach better than naval artillery and with the vast majority of Vietnam close to shore, there was no shortage of targets.

Still, some remained off limits or were out of range for the ships offshore even with their new extended range ammunition, especially in the heavily fortified north. Continuing the search for solutions LTV and the Navy began to re-examine their old missile program. The timing couldn't be better. With Hawaii dry docked in Long Beach for an overhaul prior to another Vietnam deployment modifications could be easily performed. Her launchers were removed from storage, reconditioned and reinstalled in short order and her magazines reconfigured once again. After some bugs were worked out during her post overhaul shakedown Hawaii received the green light and steamed for Southeast Asia, collecting supplies and escorts along the way. With only room for four missiles the initial targets would need to be chosen carefully but there was no shortage of viable candidates. More weapons were already en route to the Philippines but numbers would remain low until LTV could ramp up production pending a successful combat debut. Upon arriving in theater four choice targets with eight backups had been selected and Hawaii went to work. Within two days her magazines would be empty, in more ways than one.

Hawaii had led a charmed life so far. Originally laid down back in December of 1943 at the New York Shipbuilding Corporation in Camden, NJ she would languish for almost twenty years before finally going to sea. Victim of the post war draw down, construction was officially halted in February of 1947, a mere fifteen percent away from completion. Technology had surpassed her original role has a big gun cruiser. Missiles were now in the forefront and these early models required large platforms for their utilization. Hawaii and other large ships was held in incomplete states while designs were drawn up and decisions made. Following Korea the Navy realized that large caliber naval guns still had an important role to play in the modern fleet even with the advent of jets and missiles. Combined with the brand new and unproven nature of the technology they were hesitant to go with designs that traded all a ship's guns for missiles and compromise designs were chosen. Known as "single enders" these early conversions retained their gun batteries forward and amidships while gaining new missiles aft. By late 1958 Hawaii's new design was proposed and during the following year the detailed plan was finished and construction begun a new. On a cold March day in 1962 at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard Hawaii was finally commissioned.

From her bridge forward she looked roughly as her designers has originally conceived her. Six heavy 12"/50 Mark 8 rifles in two triple turrets occupied her bow with three twin 5"/38 dual-purpose mounts and ten twin 3"/50 anti-aircraft mounts rounding out her gun batteries. All her guns save two of the 3" mounts were cited in the forward half of the ship. Aft in place of the original third 12"/50 turret now rose the massive deck house for her Talos surface to air missile system. The after part of the ship was festooned with guidance and search radars associated with this new system. Designed to defend the ship and her escorts against long range air attack, each of her 52 missiles could reach out 100nm. Only able to guide two missiles at once she had two twin launchers for the Tartar missile system for shorter range engagements. Arranged in "waist" positions near her funnel she could guide four of her 84 Tartars at once. To control these weapons, no less than four search radars, six missile illuminators and six gun directors would work together to locate and lock their respective weapons on targets. To protect against the growing submarine threat an ASROC "pepper box" was installed aft of her mainmast and additional rockets stowed in a magazine below the launcher. Two triple Mk-32 torpedo tubes mounted on the main deck combined with a powerful SQS-26 bow mounted sonar rounded out her anti-submarine armament. Hawaii joined the fleet as a truly awesome and far more capable warship their her original designers could have ever dreamed.

"Everything checks out sir, we're ready to launch," announced a talker in Hawaii's CIC.
"Very well, begin the countdown," replied the TAO. As a ten count began all involved watched a small television set displaying the close circuit feed of the missile on its launcher. As zero was heard the screen flashed and all was obscured. Despite being three decks below the launcher the CIC watch still felt their ship shudder as the big missile left its launcher, bound for the jungle over 200 miles away.
"Ukulele calling Mr. White, fat lady is en route." A muffled "roger" was the only reply.
"Four for Four on launches. Let's see if we can keep up our hit streak as well," announced the Missile Officer. Over the last day and a half Hawaii had fired three of her four missiles and all had successfully hit their targets or had come close enough to destroy them. With 3,000lbs warheads "close enough" counts. With her fourth successful launch her magazines were now empty. Missiles were not scheduled to arrive in Subic Bay for another week but that didn't mean Hawaii would be idle. It was now time to unlimber her gun batteries and do things the old fashioned way.

"This is always the boring part...waiting for the thing to show up," remarked one of the squad.
"Keep your pants on Evans. Enjoy the rest, it'll be here before you know it. Then we can get back to slogging through the bush," replied the team leader. After what seemed like an eternity later they began to hear the shrill whine of the missile's turbojet engine.
"Here she comes..." They all watched in silence as the missile roared towards the mountain and impacted against its side about one hundred feet above the tunnel entrance. The entire valley was briefly lit up as the fireball sent an eruption of rocks, soil, and foliage in all directions. When the smoke had cleared and the debris had settled the team was able to observe that half of the mountain had now slid into the valley, taking part of the tunnel and the bridge with it. Shock waves had caused a collapse of what remained of the tunnel, blowing debris out the other end for hundreds of feet.
"Well damn... Charlie won't be using that ever again that's for sure!"
"Mr. White to Ukulele, consider the crowd very pleased with the fat lady's performance. Bravo to all," called the radioman. With that he packed up his gear and he and his squad melted back into the jungle. They'd be back at their operating base inside of a week.


Drawing of the Hawaii in her much altered Talos fit will be soon to come.

In the meantime however enjoy a sketch of one of her whiffed escorts; the USS Hilo (CLG-154) named for Hilo, Hawaii. She's a completely custom deigned Tartar armed 1960's version of the CL-154 class AA cruisers (cancelled in 1945) that were meant as successors to the wartime CL-51 class. More of the story will follow and the title will make sense later ;)

The Hilo I'm calling done for now. Did a quick and dirty color rendition too.

I did learn about the draw backs of using tracing paper though... I'll be going back to my original method of using Layout Bond instead. Forgive the roughness of this sketch...

Any and all feedback so far would be appreciated as always.

-Mike


Attachments:
scan0005 (Edit 2a).jpg
scan0005 (Edit 2a).jpg [ 184.54 KiB | Viewed 1839 times ]
scan0005 (Edit) Color 2a.jpg
scan0005 (Edit) Color 2a.jpg [ 169.88 KiB | Viewed 1839 times ]

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Last edited by Cliffy B on Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Some stats for the Hilo

LOA: 591' 6"
LWL: 580'
B(wl): 55' 6"
Disp: about 6,900 tns (LT) and 9,200 (FL)
100,000SHP for 33 kts
Range: 6,000 at 20 kts.
Crew: about 540 plus 45 Flag Staff

Armor:
Belt: 3.125" on 5/8" STS
Deck: 1.25"
Pilothouse: 1.25" all around
Gun Mts: 0.75" all around

Weapons:
6 Mk-42 Mod 9 5"/54 automatics in 6 single mounts (3,600 rounds) with 2 Mk-68 Directors.
4 Mk-33 3"/50 automatics in 2 twin mounts (3,000 rounds) with 2 Mk-63 directors.
2 Mk-13 Mod 0 GMLS (80 Tartars) with 4 SPG-51s.
1 Mk-16 ASROC "Pepper box" (24 ASROCs)
4 Mk-32 SVTTs in 2 twin mounts mounted internally underneath the 3"/50 mounts (16 torpedoes).


SPS-10 - Surface Search
SPS-37 - 2D Air Search
SPS-48 - 3D Air Search
SQS-26 - Sonar
ULQ-6 - ECM
URN-25 - TACAN
Fanfare - Torpedo Decoy (mounted internally in the stern)

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:18 pm
Posts: 114
I'm looking forward to more, nicely done. I can't find much on the CL-154 class, any good info you know of?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Hey Jason, there's a write up and sketch in Friedman's Cruiser book as well as this alternate design sketch from the USN Spring Styles Book.

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/OnlineLibrary/photos/images/s-file/s511-66c.htm

I was reading about proposed FRAM upgrades for the CL-51s and DL-1, saw this design and just ran with it! Glad you like it :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:18 pm
Posts: 114
Interesting that they went super firing on the turrets, when the Worcesters didn't. Lighter guns made the difference I suppose.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 1780
..


Last edited by carr on Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Alrighty folks, here's Hawaii!

Some stats for the Hawaii

LOA: 808'
LWL: 790'
B(wl): 90' 9"
Disp: about 26,000 tns (LT) and 32,000 (FL)
170,000SHP for 32 kts
Range: 12,000nm at 15 kts.
Crew: about 1900 plus about 45 Flag Staff

Armor:
Belt: 9.5" (angled 10 degrees)
Bomb Deck: 1.4"
Armored Deck: 3.25" and 2.8" on 1" STS
Conning Tower: 6.5" sides and 4" roof and tube. "Protected Pilothouse" of a CA-134 class cruiser.
Main Battery: 12.8" Face, 5" Roof, 6 and 5.25" Sides, and 5.25" Rear.
Secondary Battery: 1" Face and 0.75" other sides.

Weapons:
6 Mk-8 12"/50 BLRs in 2 triple turrets (1,000 rounds) with 1 Mk-34 Director with Mk-13 Radar.
6 Mk-32 5"/38s in 3 twin mounts (2,500 rounds) with 1 Mk-37 Director with Mk-25 Radar.
12 Mk-33 3"/50 automatics in 6 twin mounts (9,000 rounds) with 2 Mk-56 directors.
2 Regulus II Surface to Surface missiles launchers with 8 missiles.
1 Mk-12 GMLS with 52 Talos with 2 SPG-49.
2 Mk-11 GMLS with 84 Tartar with 4 SPG-51.
1 Mk-16 ASROC "Pepper box" (24 ASROCs).
6 Mk-32 SVTTs in 2 triple mounts (18 torpedoes).
2 SH-2 LAMPS I ASW/Utility Helos in below deck hangar in stern.

SPS-10 - Surface Search
SPS-43 - 2D Air Search
SPS-52 - 3D Air Search
SQS-23 - Sonar
ULQ-6 - ECM
URN-25 - TACAN
Fanfare - Torpedo Decoy (mounted internally in the stern)


Attachments:
scan0001 Photomerge (Edit 2) Color 2a.jpg
scan0001 Photomerge (Edit 2) Color 2a.jpg [ 187.07 KiB | Viewed 1727 times ]
scan0001 Photomerge (Edit 2) 2a.jpg
scan0001 Photomerge (Edit 2) 2a.jpg [ 192.04 KiB | Viewed 1727 times ]

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Last edited by Cliffy B on Wed May 25, 2016 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 6:01 am
Posts: 409
Location: Ontario Canada
A very interesting thread.

Scott

_________________
K494 HMCS Arnprior
Royal Canadian Navy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2016 9:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:42 pm
Posts: 92
I really like both of your ships. They would truly make great models.

Bill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 7:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 372
MK 13 GMLS - would this weapon be a "drop in replacement" for forward 5" 38s (weight and size)?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:39 am
Posts: 2025
Location: Harlan, Kentucky, U.S.A.
Well done. Nice little bit of creative writing. I've paid good money for books that did not read that well. You seem to have a flair for it. It also triggered something in my long term memory. IIRC, when the reactivated World War II cruisers and battleships that the USN employed off Vietnam used their main battery guns they had to get in relatively close to shore and the term applied to it was "goin' to Surf City".

Bob M.

_________________
Give me a fast ship, for I would like to get out of harm's way!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 484
Outstanding work, I love it all.


Cliffy B wrote:
Alrighty folks, here's Hawaii!

Weapons:
6 Mk-8 12"/50 BLRs in 2 triple turrets (1,000 rounds) with 1 Mk-34 Director with Mk-13 Radar.
6 Mk-32 5"/38s in 3 twin mounts (2,500 rounds) with 1 Mk-37 Director with Mk-25 Radar.
12 Mk-33 3"/50 automatics in 6 twin mounts (9,000 rounds) with 2 Mk-56 directors.
2 Regulus II Surface to Surface missiles launchers with 8 missiles.
2 Mk-13 Mod 0 GMLS (80 Tartars) with 4 SPG-51s.
1 Mk-16 ASROC "Pepper box" (24 ASROCs).
6 Mk-32 SVTTs in 2 triple mounts (18 torpedoes).
2 SH-2 LAMPS I ASW/Utility Helos in below deck hangar in stern.



I note an issue with the nomenclature of the weapons listed and depicted.

Looks like a fit similar to the Albany/Chicago/Columbus

The Talos system should be Mk12,
http://www.seaforces.org/wpnsys/SURFACE ... uncher.htm

and the depicted twin-arm Tartar launcher should be the Mk11
http://www.seaforces.org/wpnsys/SURFACE ... uncher.htm
Mk11 had a magazine capacity of 42, as opposed to 40 for its replacement - the Mk13

The Mk13 GMLS was the Tartar "Single Arm Bandit" used on the Adams and Perry classes.

So, I recommend it reading:

6 Mk-8 12"/50 BLRs in 2 triple turrets (1,000 rounds) with 1 Mk-34 Director with Mk-13 Radar.
6 Mk-32 5"/38s in 3 twin mounts (2,500 rounds) with 1 Mk-37 Director with Mk-25 Radar.
12 Mk-33 3"/50 automatics in 6 twin mounts (9,000 rounds) with 2 Mk-56 directors.
2 Regulus II Surface to Surface missiles launchers with 8 missiles.
1 Mk-12 GMLS with 52 Talos with 2 SPG-49.
2 Mk-11 GMLS with 84 Tartar with 4 SPG-51.

1 Mk-16 ASROC "Pepper box" (24 ASROCs).
6 Mk-32 SVTTs in 2 triple mounts (18 torpedoes).
2 SH-2 LAMPS I ASW/Utility Helos in below deck hangar in stern.

Note the add of a Talos launcher and correction to the Tatar launchers


On Hilo, the GMLS could be Mk22 (16 rounds, as found on the Brooke class DEG/FFG) or Mk 13 (with 40).
Difference between the Mk 22 and Mk 13 is either one (inner = 16) ring of missiles in the magazine, or two (inner+outer, or 16+24).
The decider is in rather the ship could take the extra weight in that position for the outer ring of missiles.
I'd note that the California class CGN's main missile armament was two Mk 13 - 40+40 for comparison purposes.


Other reference:
http://www.okieboat.com/GMM/GMM%203%20a ... ystems.pdf


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 484
Busto963 wrote:
MK 13 GMLS - would this weapon be a "drop in replacement" for forward 5" 38s (weight and size)?


According to reference, the Mk22 (inner ring only version of the Mk 13 - 16 rounds) would be a 'drop-in' replacement for the Mk42 5"/54"

"Tartar Launching System Mk 22 was developed for use on small ships where space and weight allowances were too limited to permit the use of the Mk 11 or Mk 13 system. The Mk 22 system was designed to replace a 5"/54 gun mount. A single ready-service ring is located directly below the launcher with the missiles stowed vertically."

Page 144:
http://www.okieboat.com/GMM/GMM%203%20a ... ystems.pdf

This does not say you could not replace a Mk 42 5"/54 with a Mk 13, after all, that is essentially what was done between the Forrest Sherman and Adams class (with some additional growth on the Adams class), just that the Mk 22 was an option if the vessel could not take the higher Mk 11/13 weight. So I read this as you probably could always trade a Mk 42 5"/54 for a Mk 22, and sometimes you may be able to get a Mk 11/13 if you could take the extra weight.

Other references I have indicate the Mk 42 5"/54 was intended to be a near-direct replacement of the twin 5"/38 mount, however, as in all things, it came in in excess of that target weight.

BUT (confused yet?), the Brooke class DEG/FFG was the Garcia class FF with the amidships 5"/38 SINGLE replaced with the Mk 22. So...

Essentially there is real-world evidence to the Mk 13 being a close swap for the Mk 42 5"/54, and there is real world evidence for the Mk 22 being able to be a near direct swap for a 5"/38 single, and there is real world documentation for the Mk 22 intending to be a swap out for a 5"/54....so there you have the confusing information.

I do believe is is reasonable in a WHIF to replace a twin 5"/38 with Mk 22 without much modification (say, replace the B mount on a Gearing FRAM - but note the ship still needs the other components such as computers, 3D radar and FC radar) - not with Mk 13 unless you found more weight somewhere - the second ring of the Mk 13 would certainly make it overweight.

some other references:
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_5-54_mk42.htm
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_5-38_mk12.htm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 372
SumGui wrote:
Busto963 wrote:
MK 13 GMLS - would this weapon be a "drop in replacement" for forward 5" 38s (weight and size)?


According to reference, the Mk22 (inner ring only version of the Mk 13 - 16 rounds) would be a 'drop-in' replacement for the Mk42 5"/54"

"Tartar Launching System Mk 22 was developed for use on small ships where space and weight allowances were too limited to permit the use of the Mk 11 or Mk 13 system. The Mk 22 system was designed to replace a 5"/54 gun mount. A single ready-service ring is located directly below the launcher with the missiles stowed vertically."

Page 144:
http://www.okieboat.com/GMM/GMM%203%20a ... ystems.pdf

This does not say you could not replace a Mk 42 5"/54 with a Mk 13, after all, that is essentially what was done between the Forrest Sherman and Adams class (with some additional growth on the Adams class), just that the Mk 22 was an option if the vessel could not take the higher Mk 11/13 weight. So I read this as you probably could always trade a Mk 42 5"/54 for a Mk 22, and sometimes you may be able to get a Mk 11/13 if you could take the extra weight.

Other references I have indicate the Mk 42 5"/54 was intended to be a near-direct replacement of the twin 5"/38 mount, however, as in all things, it came in in excess of that target weight.

BUT (confused yet?), the Brooke class DEG/FFG was the Garcia class FF with the amidships 5"/38 SINGLE replaced with the Mk 22. So...

Essentially there is real-world evidence to the Mk 13 being a close swap for the Mk 42 5"/54, and there is real world evidence for the Mk 22 being able to be a near direct swap for a 5"/38 single, and there is real world documentation for the Mk 22 intending to be a swap out for a 5"/54....so there you have the confusing information.

I do believe is is reasonable in a WHIF to replace a twin 5"/38 with Mk 22 without much modification (say, replace the B mount on a Gearing FRAM - but note the ship still needs the other components such as computers, 3D radar and FC radar) - not with Mk 13 unless you found more weight somewhere - the second ring of the Mk 13 would certainly make it overweight.

some other references:
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_5-54_mk42.htm
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_5-38_mk12.htm


Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Thanks guys! That was a big whoops on my part for Hawaii's weapons list :doh_1: Edit it I shall!

Thank you for the links to the launcher info. Those photos are awesome!!! That PDF link is perfect too!

Glad you guys like the designs and the story. Thank you for the compliment Bob, that means a lot :thumbs_up_1: I will definitely be using that term when I get back to writing the rest of the night's "festivities".

The similarities to the CG-10 class are not a coincidence. I "cut and paste" the after Talos arrangement from them figuring it would be an easier/cheaper installation and more appropriate given the time period then a custom fabricated setup. I modified it from there but the basic structure is from a CG-10.

I chose the full Mk-13's to fully utilize the size of the ship and make her more useful. I looked at the design sketch weights and the weights of the launchers and guns when they were actually built as well. Best I can tell a Mk-13 Mod 0 (introduced in 1962) weighed about 66.3 tons. Further mods weren't available until the 1970s and they weighed more anymore.

A Mk-42 Mod 9 (closet mod to the time period it seems; about 1964) weighed 73 tons fully loaded (ammo and fluids) and 64.6 tons dry. So they are very close in weight to each other.

In comparison a Mk-22 Mod 0 (introduced in 1966) weighed 46.2 tns and a twin 5"/38 with a DD shield (Mk-38 Mod 0) weighed 47.9 tons.

I don't know if the weights for the GMLS's are empty or loaded but they are close enough for these calculations. The design sketches would have been modified and weights altered had they gone through with these anyway. So a "close enough" mindset I think is just fine for a whiff design such as this. Probably got more precise then necessary but I like my designs to be as real as possible :thumbs_up_1:

Thanks again for the interest guys.

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 1780
..


Last edited by carr on Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 3125
Location: Hawaii
Ahhh, the Link-11 antenna! Yes...it among other things didn't make it from the side to the top drawing and vice versa now that I look it over. I tried to place it similar to how other cruisers and the BBs had them but yeah, it could probably slide forward a bit more. Those are twin 3"/50s not 40mms but point still taken. That second mount on the bow was intended more for firing on the beam then the bow so it would have cutouts to prevent it taking out the antennae or the forward most gun tub.

Glad you like em Bob :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Drawing Board:
1/700 Whiff USS Leyte and escorts 1984
1/700 Whiff USN Modernized CAs 1984
1/700 Whiff ASW Showdown - FFs vs SSGN 1984

Slipway:
1/700 Whiff USN ASW Hunter Killer Group Dio 1984


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2016 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 372
carr wrote:
For Hawaii, that large antenna on the bow (I should know the name of it but I'm drawing a blank - sorry) is shown on the profile but not the overhead view. The profile shows it just about smack on top of the anchor handling gear. Maybe a conflict there? Plus, it looks like it would cut a major chunk of the field of fire of the 40mm that's shown immediately aft of it.

Isn't that an AS-1018 (or similar) discage omnidirectional HF antenna?

If it is, then it is the single most important of the ship (at least as far as ship to shore fire is concerned) and well worth relocating or removing weapons to enable that antenna to function!

NGFS was assigned to HF nets - a gunfire ship that cannot communicate with troops ashore is a liability.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2016 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 1780
..


Last edited by carr on Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2016 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 372
carr wrote:
After a little digging, I agree with Busto that the antenna is a HF communications Discone-cage antenna, commonly mounted on the bow of ships in order to avoid interference from surrounding equipment and structures. ...
I didn't find any description of what type of communications it was used for so I'd go with Busto's explanation. He's invariably correct.


Not sure that my wife would agree, but I will take any praise where I can! :whistle:

I think that these antennas were far enough forward that the main guns were fine, but any encroachment by other weapons might be problematic.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group