The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:02 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 7:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:10 am
Posts: 179
Location: Australia
will1957 wrote:
Good Afternoon Everyone,

I am very late to this discussion, but read this thread again after reading the AP507 thread on Steelnavy. Regarding JHS' post about artists and builders models, I think JHS has made a fair point about artist's paintings and builder's models even given artist's and builder's licence. What I would like to add is when I saw the model of HMS Indomitable at the old Museum of Transport in Glasgow, I was surprised at how blue it was - it was a dark grey with more than a hint of purple blue. At the time, I remembered having read that pre-WW1 and WW1 greys had no blue in them and this was a later development. The blueness of the dark grey it was painted (if that makes sense) came as a real surprise.

I did have a photograph of the model, but it's long lost on one of my now "dead" computers.

Best Wishes,

Will1957.


Are you sure you are thinking of Indomitable? As a builder's model it should date circa 1908 and well before greys had blue in them. Attached a couple of shots of that Indomitable model and the immediate post WW1 model of the Hood they hold.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Hello JHS and Will1957,

Where to start.. always a question.

The comment on modern paint matching is very interesting. Modern navy's seam to focus on Operation Efficiency and Economic Efficiency. So paint is delivered premixed and used as is. This thread focuses on the time frame of about 1901 to 1918. This was the transition from the Victoria Era of black, white and buff to the first use of grey by the RN. While the colours may have changed, it took much longer to change the Victorian attitudes where strict unquestioning exact compliance to orders was the norm. But first lets look at supply. Paint was not delivered premixed. Instead the First Lieutenant instructed the Ships Painter who worked with his crew using an Admiralty issued balance to weigh out Admiralty issued materials to make the paint for the ship on the spot to an Admiralty issued formula resulting in 100 cwt of ships paint. Victorian era attitudes where that if the Lieutenant got this wrong, he would not advance. In this era an Admiral was court marshalled for continuing gun target practice rather than returning to harbour to paint ship. So rather than the current Operation Efficiency and Economic Efficiency it was Strict Compliance that got you promoted. If you look at the pictures of the ships in the 1910 to 1914 time period they are immaculate with perfect paint. By 1918 where Operational Efficiency was taking over, some of the destroyers could look shabby indeed. And even HMS Erin, a battleship had shameful paint.

There are numerous posts in this thread that draw serious contention to the use of photos, models and art as a basis for colour. But here is another example. These shots were taken by me in the Transport Museum, the same day, using the same camera. The first uses the 'natural light' in the room and the second uses a flash.

Attachment:
GTM HMS Indomitable 1s.jpg


Notice the pronounced dark blue grey and also the odd greenish tint to the room.

Attachment:
GTM HMS Indomitable 2s.jpg


Notice with the flash that you get a neutral grey from the reflected balanced light of the flash.

So where to start... That was my problem with RN WW1 grey. So using an analytical balance, I mixed as per Admiralty formula the greys. Of course after 100 years I could not get Admiralty issued materials so I used mainly artist supplies as they come in small quantities. (Lead Oxide is considered a toxin and the less you have, the less you need to correctly dispose of.) The art supply lead and zinc oxides where also very finely ground which I feel is suitable in that current model colours use very finely ground pigments and so the colour matching would be more valid. Also checking the MSDS sheets for the art supplied compounds they were 100% Lead Oxide and zinc oxide so they should be as close a match to Admiralty supplied material as is available in this time period.

Do I feel the colours are perfect - nope. But I do believe they are a lot better place to start than any where else.

Cheers,
George


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:10 am
Posts: 179
Location: Australia
George,

I don’t think all paint was mixed on board. Naval bases might or might not have had premixed paint available but RAN records indicate the various Naval Dockyards mixed and held the paints for ships in their Naval Stores. Ready mixed paint isn’t a modern thing. The RAN was purchasing paint in the 1920s from manufacturers for smaller ships i.e. destroyers and below as they did not carry a Painter. At times they issued these to the larger ships too.

Notice with the flash that you get a neutral grey from the reflected balanced light of the flash. > Actually, my photos were taken without the use of flash. Those were taken with a speed of 1/6th of a second with the Image Stabilisation System working its little heart out compared to your non flash one of 1/30th of a second. May be the longer exposure lets in more light and shows a truer colour.

The Hood ones were at 1/5th second but with the camera’s rubber hood right up against the glass to stop any reflections. Hood should in theory be in WW1 507B.

regards,

Michael


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 12:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:10 am
Posts: 179
Location: Australia
Well how about a different approach to WW1 RN greys. Instead of trying to recreate the colours, have they been there all the time but we didn’t recognise them? A decade or so back when I got interested in RN colours, two colours always intrigued me. BS381 introduced in 1930, a colour called Light Battleship Grey #31 and Dark Battleship Grey #32. Logically as the BS381 series were for government bodies, they should have been RN colours.

During the interwar years, we were led to believe that the dark grey should have been 507A and the light 507C. The problem being that the only reference point I had were the S&S Colour charts showing AP507A and AP507C (1920). Both were greys with a bluish tint and neither looked like 32 or 31 which were more “pure” greys. 32 looked to be too light for 507A and too dark for 507B. We now know that 507B was the colour in use in the interwar period as the RN’s darker grey and, from 1933, was referred to as “Dark Grey Paint, Home Fleet Shade”. Prior to that the only reference against the formula for 507B was “Home Stations”. It is not the S&S 507B.

Recently, I’ve been trawling through the Australian Navy’s and Australian National Archives and one thing that has become apparent is that in the 1920s, the RAN was buying ready mixed paint for use on smaller vessels. We know also that the RN was buying ready mixed paint too. My first thoughts were that the 381 colours must be the RN colours in use in 1930. A nice idea until the discovery of AFOs showing that blue grey paint was in use in 1930. However, looking at the records on the Paint Committee in WW2, they were talking during the war not only with paint companies about paint but colours with British Standards. So if they were talking to them for at least 5 years before the updated BS381C came into being in 1948, how long were the discussions before the 1930 issue? Were the two battleship greys actually those in use back in 1924/25? If so, they would still be the WW1 shades of grey.

So was BS381 31 Light Battleship Grey actually WW1 507C and 32 Dark Battleship Grey actually WW1 507B? 31 is now BS381C Light Grey and 32 is BS381C 632 Dark Admiralty Grey.

Most people building modern RN ships would know 632 as the RN’s deck and flight deck colour for many years. Few would know 631. If you want to know what a ship painted in that colour looks like, there are quite a few photos around. In 1955, the RAN dropped 507C as it standard grey and switched to 631 Light Grey. They used that colour until 1985 when Storm Grey, a darker version of Light Grey, came into use.

Some photos attached of RAN ships in Light Grey.

George, if you would like a sample of Light Grey, just let me know the address and I’ll send you one on some plastic for comparison to your mixed samples.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Hi Michael,

Remember, the time frame is 1901 to 1918. Labour is cheap and plentiful, there really are no large manufactures. Yes, the dockyard maties would indeed make paint but what to do at anchor?

I used a Canon digital camera with the ISO set to 6400. This gives typical indoor shots at 1/60 sec and F5.0. I have noticed that colour balance between between digital cameras from Nikon, Canon SLR's and Canon point and shoot vary for the same shot. But the blue reflected light from the model of Indomitable was indeed what you saw using the odd artificial light in the room. The flash gave a different colour as it used a fuller light spectrum. Time should not significantly affect colour at normal shooting conditions. Only under low light without a flash will the colour shift. That condition did not exist. The differences in colour between your camera and mine is simply additional proof that photos should not be used to determine colour no matter what the camera make or its settings.

The interwar material that you and Dick have dug out is really marvellous. Have you considered starting a new thread? Seams to be a shame to have it buried in here.

Cheers,
George


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:10 am
Posts: 179
Location: Australia
George,

Yes, the dockyard maties would indeed make paint but what to do at anchor? > holystone the decks, all hands to coal or the ever popular, a run ashore to the pub.

Some more shots from that series and one from 3 years later attached one with & without flash. Also two photos I always send to people about the effect of flash. Same ship model at the Science Museum with & without flash.

One thing that intrigued me looking at yours was the fact that the turrets seem to be a different colour to the rest of the ship. A closer look and mine appear that way too.

I’ll leave it to Dick to start the inter war thread when he is ready. There are still a couple of AFOs which seem to be missing up to 1925.

Regards,

Michael


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:12 pm 
HMS CAROLINE's 38 shades of gray, see the slideshow for Jutland:

http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-la ... s-caroline

and a very interesting article, especially for autumn 1914:

http://www.cnrs-scrn.org/northern_marin ... 71-192.pdf


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:50 pm 
George, having gone through the same process you are using for WWII USN paints back in the 1980s, I understand your zeal, but it is a useless passion. (1) The quest to find exact duplicates of long-gone ingredients is a chimera. You can approximate the ingredients for a educated guess, but I would never say the results are definitive. (2) The sheer randomness of the way in which these ingredients were mixed by the users defies trying to define exact specifications. The best we can do is approximate using available artifacts, such as the BARHAM section, or dockyard models, or paintings. A few years ago the Luftwaffe buffs were puzzling over a variety of late-war colors found on preserved aircraft. A German researcher discovered the varieties were due to several paint manufacturers going completely off spec when mixing the paints. Now, if industrialized paint production results in discordant swatches, imagine what happens when paints are mixed by sailors who, most decidedly, are not using precision measures. Belief in uniform colors is a sort of obsession of modelers just like wargamers like to believe every battalion in an army matched its table of organization and equipment.

If the slideshow on the HMS CAROLINE story is correct, that the color in which she was painted in 1916 was a greenish-gray (which fits the "French Gray" description by the WWI author to a T for some types of the color), this confounds the documents. I would like to see the paint chips, and I would like to see the reasoning by which the conservators came to the conclusion this paint was her 1916 color. Interestingly, the slideshow presents a remarkably close match for A.P. 507C and A.P.507A.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Hi J Spencer,

Paint was much simpler in 1914, just carbon for black and for white, lead carbonate and zinc oxide. Hard to mess this up when the ingredients are issued for use. So I concur that modern paints and manufactured paints with complex mixtures allow for many errors. I do not agree that the RN had difficulty in mixing paint. Just look at the photographs and ships are in constant tone and ships in harbour settings all look alike.

Having visited HMS Caroline you can visually see what parts of the ship are original, what was modified during WW1 and what was modified after. It is unfortunate that the author of the slide show was not more specific. Paint chips from near the bridge does allow for variability. It should also be realized that HMS Caroline original bridge structure was significantly rebuilt during her refit of 1917-1918. From my photos ~100 taken during my visit I would say that the Captains head and chart room are all that was original. Are the paint chip representative - maybe.

Also there is an error. As HMS Caroline was painted using white lead or lead carbonate in the paint this is both toxic and dangerous for the environment. White lead has a PEL/TLV (mg/mj) of 0.05 which is very toxic. (PEL = Permissible Exposure Limit TLV = Threshold Limit Value) as per the MSDS sheet.

So I'm going to comply with Admiralty orders and that would have her in Pattern 507B per CIO 317 6/4/1915 (what I called AFO 19.11.14 Grey 1:20 back on page 1 of this thread).

Cheers,
George


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:36 pm 
More on how the conservators discovered CAROLINE's 1916 gray:

http://www.nmrn.org.uk/explore/hms-caro ... ct-updates


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:13 am 
Well, of course, the ships would appear to be of uniform in color in monochrome, glass plate photographs. If I were to convert my images of CVN TRUMAN to monochrome, I am sure the parti-colored carrier would appear to be a uniform gray. It's only in color images that we can see subtle differences in the chroma. Apparently, there was a scholarly article written about the CAROLINE paint discoveries, unfortunately it was removed from the web. On the C museum site, there are a couple videos. In one the captain involved with her restoration remarks that he was surprised to see her Jutland color had blue in it, which doesn't jibe with the greenish published image. Apparently, there is some confusion on this matter. Since they found the "Jutland color" under layers of paint, see more on this on the C Museum site, they did not discover it in the open, they may be onto something.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:52 am 
The WWII USN blue ship paints were mixes of lampblack, ultramarine blue, and titanium white. Even following the propotions very carefully I had a very difficult time getting my samples to resemble the official chips which were matched to the 1929 edition of the "Munsell Book of Color".

I would be fascinated to see some of the WWI artifacts at the Portsmouth (UK) museum to see if there are any with traces of Jutland-era paint in order to see how uniform the colors are.

The National Maritime Museum website has several of the maritime painter Cull's ship models made "from life" in the pre-WWI period. The NMM website displays his battleship "Hindustan" and battlecruiser "Queen Mary". The former is in the pre-war medium gray and the latter in the pre-war very dark gray.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 2:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
Posts: 650
Location: UK
J Spencer wrote:

Interestingly, the slideshow presents a remarkably close match for A.P. 507C and A.P.507A.


The potential for confusion here is considerable. Please can you clarify which slides you believe show 507C and 507A.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Hello,

Lets consider drying oil based paint. You place it when wet and the first thing that happens is that the turpentine evaporates into the air along with some of the light oils giving the horrible smell of drying oil based paint. The paint is now much more stable and has a film. For black paint it is the dryers and for grey and white paint the driers and the lead carbonate that cause a catalytic reaction in the linseed oil causing cross linkages to form. This results in 24 to 72 hours in the final stabilized dry paint. Only the paint is actually anything but stable; it is still reacting. The catalysts are still there, still causing cross linking, only at a slower rate. Ammonia from cleaners causes yellowing. Sulphur Dioxide from coal and oil burning causes the lead to go black. Oxygen from the air also reacts with the oils causing yellowing. This is countered by UV from the sun that bleaches out the yellow. But as soon as covered by a layer of opaque paint, the yellow reforms.

So the photo micrograph of the layers in HMS Caroline's paint is delightful in its own right but less than helpful in determining paint colours. Also one of the Lessons of Jutland was that RN ships where painted to dark a grey. If you look at the paint layers the start is dark grey and then goes to two differing light greys. Just how do you decide the time line in paint layers? Based on the 'Lesson', it makes sense that the lighter greys are post Jutland. Notice as well that the white paint used under Admiralty order in tropical waters has yellowed, as would be expected. So if the white is yellowed, the greys must also be colour altered.

Cheers,
George


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: On RN WW1 Grey
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:18 am
Posts: 941
Location: West Virginia, USA
And that yellowing in the HMS Caroline sample can be reversed by "bleaching" with a UV light source, and then can be more accurately be color-matched (colour-matched).

_________________
Cheers,
John Snyder
Shady Grove Farm
Shady Grove Farm on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ShadyGroveDuckEggs


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group