Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:36 am
Posts: 681
Location: Vigo, Spain
|
Hi there Hank, Meister Baumann, Tom, Marijin and all,
Thanks very much for your feedback and your interest, really much appreciated.BB62vet wrote: I noticed that you have added frames on either side of the inside of the hull - this would be consistent with the boat as shown in your photo #1015, but only partially exposed.
My guess is that the framing was covered by the 1950s, but that's only a guess. Honestly, I was not able to clarify this subject. It was imposible to find any clear picture of the inside of the inboard details of the whale boat model I was reproducing, and as only source I followed the model of this whale boat:Attachment:
(1025).jpg [ 56.72 KiB | Viewed 1899 times ]
...along with the sketches of Al Ross in his AOTS The Sullivans --very clear things, on the other hand-- and both seemed to describe the same thing, i.e., frames. Your reasoning sounds consistent, and you are probably right. Too bad, because at this stage of the construction to go back to the beginning, with the stern complete, and everything that should be deleted would be no good. I know myself and my fat fingers too well at this stage of my life.
On the other hand, the second picture that you uploaded to the thread has allowed to me to realize that I had omitted the hooks and reinforcements that were used to lift the whaler out of the drink. I have added the elements accordingly, and also some other things that I had not done yet:Attachment:
(1026).jpg [ 108.51 KiB | Viewed 1899 times ]
With this, there is more detail, and again at no cost in work or time. Fliger747 wrote: You might want to check the inclination of the shaft as it is probably not parallel to the keel bottom but inclined as often were the motor assemblies. Yes, I have noticed that as well. This piece moved during the process, only a fraction of mm., but it did, and was enough to be counted as a mistake. It was the first piece that I set in place in its moment, and it moved probably because of the slit in the hull that it had in the area for the corresponding Revell piece, and that I did not consider necessary to fill. Actually, the skeg broke during the last part of the process, and I had to make a new one, and it was not easy, as it has a curious shape, and is so tiny. As a solution, I will attach the screw with some angle, and as this section of the boat will be inboard-orientated, and behind the davit, I think this obvious mistake will be not noticed.Fliger747 wrote: I used to run a 26' MWB at one time, as I believe did Hank, but I never paid much attention to the details out of water (half century ago) My case too, Tom. We had one of these thing on board our ship (39 years ago !!!!), and as it was always hanging from her davits and was rarely used, I had little opportunity (well, and interest) to get inside.Fliger747 wrote: Just curious as to how you intend to suspend this boat from the davits. I don´t know myself either, but most surely I will use the plates that are already in place (made with melted plastic, marked with blue arrows), with a sketch of lifting eye, and a block attached to it, to be itself attached to the second block in the top of the davit with sections of stretched sprue. I will try this, but maybe will I have to simplify and omit the lifting eye, as these pieces are very tiny.Meister Baumann, the Fletchers in the Spanish Navy had no canopy, so it will not be necessary, but your tip is excellent. I have been considering your method for a long time to make the blast bags, using scraps of stretched sprue to make the wrinks covered with white glue. I think it can work wonderfully, and guarantee that they are not similar to each other.
So that´s all for now. Thanks again for your interest, and very best regards from this side of the seas,
Willie.
_________________
Amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso (Lk 23,43).
|
|
Login
Register
FAQ
