Vepr157 wrote:
I'm not sure where you're looking, but many sources mention the rod aerial (stabantenne). It was a slim (maybe 1-2" diameter; definitely not the same diameter as a periscope) antenna for radio communications while at periscope depth. The antenna provided with the Revell kit appears to be reasonably accurate. It appears that the aerial for the Type IX was in some cases a much thicker mast, which I assume is what you're referring to.
When you're asking a question, please post photos/drawings so that we know what you're talking about. It's hard to tell you what you're seeing in the photo of the U-203 if we cannot also see that photo.
1st of all, I did not ask a question. I presented a piece of information.
I know many source mention and illustrate the small rod antenna. And revell depicts the rod antenna as so mentioned and illustrated. The small antenna always seem to me to be quite disproportionate to the large bulge on the side of the mid-war VIIC conning tower that accommodates it. The bulge is actually larger than the bulge on the side of thr IXC conning tower that is definitely there to accommodates a periscope shaft sized extendable antenna mast.
So here is the photo of U203 with the periscope shaft sized antenna mast extending from the bulge:

To assess its size you can compare it to the cylindrical portion of the attack periscope shaft visible above CO Mutzelburg’s left shoulder, behind the garlands.