The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sat May 24, 2025 9:17 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2024 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:35 pm
Posts: 1881
Location: Bretagne, France
posting.php?mode=quote&f=59&p=1044668

Jölle wrote:
Next, onto the portholes. Some of them have grids and I had to find out exactly which ones are true.
The grid would only have had a right to exist at the height of the anchors. On this ship, the anchors were pulled back on board with the davits and an anchor could have hit the hull or the porthole. In addition, the anchor chains ran past the portholes.
So I looked at everything I had in detail again.

The fact is that during active service, here in 1921, the front portholes were barred. You can see this in the following and best quality picture of the ship that I have. It was taken in Vladivostok in 1921.

Image

Here the section is enlarged. So there were bars, but you can’t really tell whether all the lower portholes on the bow were barred.

Image

Then this picture of the stern, also taken in Vladivostok in 1921. So quite late in their active service. She was in this dry dock for repairs.


Image

Here the enlarged and brightened section shows that there were definitely no grilles in front of the portholes at the rear.

Image

So the question arises as to where this protective measure went. The anchor area would be logical. I found the solution in the following picture.

Image

The white arrow points to the same porthole in both photos. You can clearly see here that the portholes were protected with grilles right up to the anchor storage areas.

Image


_________________
Pascal

•Battleship Bretagne 3D: https://vu.fr/FvCY
•SS Delphine 3D: https://vu.fr/NeuO
•SS Nomadic 3D: https://vu.fr/tAyL
•USS Nokomis 3D: https://vu.fr/kntC
•USS Pamanset 3D: https://vu.fr/jXGQ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 13, 2024 7:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2024 4:22 am
Posts: 12
found this japanese blog...

seems like the current kits will need a LOT of correction, especially amidships.

http://blog.livedoor.jp/studio120/

Has anybody ever done the correct ventilators etc?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2024 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:35 pm
Posts: 1881
Location: Bretagne, France
Image

https://www.kinenkan-mikasa.or.jp/en/index.html

‘Maintenance work completed, bridge and deck before reopening.’ H.I.J.M.S. MIKASA

Note the typical colour of the deck slats:

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Pascal

•Battleship Bretagne 3D: https://vu.fr/FvCY
•SS Delphine 3D: https://vu.fr/NeuO
•SS Nomadic 3D: https://vu.fr/tAyL
•USS Nokomis 3D: https://vu.fr/kntC
•USS Pamanset 3D: https://vu.fr/jXGQ


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2024 2:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2024 4:22 am
Posts: 12
since you mention the decking..

look at this blog: http://blog.livedoor.jp/studio120/archives/8874652.html

it shows the original, and the current decking, quite a difference!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 9:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:54 pm
Posts: 50
I’m looking to build Mikasa as HMS Formidable in Victorian black, white and buff. Before I purchase, do all these kits below include the lower fighting tops? These were removed from Mikasa by 1905, but remained on her half sister Formidable.

https://www.scalemates.com/kits/hasegaw ... 8/timeline

40021 - Japanese Battleship IJN Mikasa "The Battle of the Japan Sea"
40061 - IJN Battleship Mikasa "The Battle of the Yellow Sea” (the image shows fighting tops)
40081 - IJN Battleship Mikasa "The Battle of the Japan Sea" w/Figure
40090 - The Battle of the Japan Sea 1905" IJN Battleship Mikasa with two Figures
52270 - IJN Battleship Mikasa 120th Anniversary of Launch


Last edited by Matthew in TO on Thu Dec 12, 2024 10:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:54 pm
Posts: 50
Timmy C wrote:
This sectional view of the turret suggests they are vents - or at the very least, structurally integrated into the turret top. I don't think I've ever seen it portrayed as a separate colour other than as weathering or highlighting. They are not present on the museum ship today.
It’s the wide barbettes compared to the turret that always confuse me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2024 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12320
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Matthew in TO wrote:
I’m looking to build Mikasa as HMS Formidable in Victorian black, white and nuff. Before I purchase, do all these kits below include the lower fighting tops? These were removed from Mikasa by 1905, but remained on her half sister Formidable.

https://www.scalemates.com/kits/hasegaw ... 8/timeline

40021 - Japanese Battleship IJN Mikasa "The Battle of the Japan Sea"
40061 - IJN Battleship Mikasa "The Battle of the Yellow Sea” (the image shows fighting tops)
40081 - IJN Battleship Mikasa "The Battle of the Japan Sea" w/Figure
40090 - The Battle of the Japan Sea 1905" IJN Battleship Mikasa with two Figures
52270 - IJN Battleship Mikasa 120th Anniversary of Launch


The lower fighting tops are on sprue J, which was not in any of the other versions of the Hasegawa 1/350 other than the Yellow Sea kit. If you're trying to shop around because you're having a hard time finding the Yellow Sea kit, I've got good news: Hobby Search 1) has it in stock and 2) it's on steep sale: https://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10045599

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2024 10:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:54 pm
Posts: 50
Timmy C wrote:
The lower fighting tops are on sprue J, which was not in any of the other versions of the Hasegawa 1/350 other than the Yellow Sea kit. If you're trying to shop around because you're having a hard time finding the Yellow Sea kit, I've got good news: Hobby Search 1) has it in stock and 2) it's on steep sale: https://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10045599
Brillant! Thanks. I've just placed my order. You've just launched me onto the Mikasa becomes Formidable project! I've already begun comparing the two ships.

Attachment:
Formidable vs Mikasa.jpg
Formidable vs Mikasa.jpg [ 231.89 KiB | Viewed 15460 times ]


What are your thoughts on the different turret profiles? British Battleships, 1889-1904 by RA Burt states that while Mikasa was built by Vickers instead of the Royal Dockyards (Portsmouth, Chatham and Devonport) where the Formidable-class were built, the Japanese required that the same Armstrong guns as the Formidable be used instead of Vickers guns. I wonder though if the gunhouse (turret) is from Vickers, since while I cannot find any British preadreadnought with the same square turret profile as Mikasa, there are several Japanese battleships built in Britain with this turret type.

If I had a 3D printer I would make new turrets, but instead I'll use some modeling clay or filler and styrene to round off Mikasa's turrets to better look like Formidable's. Too bad there are no 1/350 Royal Navy predreadnoughts earlier than the Lord Nelsons (they used the more modern turret look of those on HMS Dreadnought). The British built a huge fleet of predreadnoughts and yet they're mostly forgotten by the model kit firms.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 8:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:54 pm
Posts: 50
Here’s a good image of the earlier rounder turret showing shells stored near the back. After the Fujis the Japanese changed to the smaller, square gun houses.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:28 pm
Posts: 778
Location: Downey, California
So, what is that patch on the turret roof that looks like slats or louvers? And for that matter, I see them in drawings, and on models, but I can't recall ever seeing them in photos of the real thing (granted, photos of pre-dreadnoughts from a high-enough angle are few and far between).

- Sean F.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 3:34 am
Posts: 154
Location: Hajdúszoboszló, Hungary
I thought they were wooden plates but do not know the why.
IJN Yashima's turret shows that they were more like steel plates:
Image

Mikasa 1904:
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:45 am
Posts: 468
could be used as same on the decks, insulation & maybe anti-skid.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:28 pm
Posts: 778
Location: Downey, California
The Yashima picture looks like they've secured a canvas cover over it. (And what a fascinating detail: "BANZAI" along the barbette shelf... just for the visitors, or might it have been there all the time? It's big enough that you could read it pretty easily in 1:700 scale.)

And the Mikasa photo looks like there's a knee-high guardrail with canvas dodger around it. Maybe the "slats" are some kind of cleats for securing stowage?

- Sean F.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2025 6:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:54 pm
Posts: 50
I notice that when builders used the Mikasa detail kits that they leave these components unrealistically unpainted. Why? Do the detailed parts not take to paint well?

https://www.hobbylinc.com/hasegawa-ijn- ... cale-40062

https://www.hlj.com/1-350-scale-ijn-bb- ... sic-hsgqg7

https://www.bnamodelworld.com/deck-sets ... ox-aw10093


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2025 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Posts: 12320
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Matthew in TO wrote:
I notice that when builders used the Mikasa detail kits that they leave these components unrealistically unpainted. Why? Do the detailed parts not take to paint well?

https://www.hobbylinc.com/hasegawa-ijn- ... cale-40062

https://www.hlj.com/1-350-scale-ijn-bb- ... sic-hsgqg7

https://www.bnamodelworld.com/deck-sets ... ox-aw10093


If you're referring to the product images, that's so buyers know what are part of the upgrade set and what are not.

Most models by actual modellers (rather than models built for the aftermarket company for advertising purposes) do paint all detail parts. Do you have links to any examples to show what you mean?

_________________
De quoi s'agit-il?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 53 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group