GRP hull question
Moderators: MartinJQuinn, JIM BAUMANN, HMAS, Tiny69, Dave Wooley
-
jjb
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am
GRP hull question
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right forum for this question or not but can anybody offer advice on pre-formed GRP hulls please. I am planning to build either a RN Type 12 or Leander class Frigate and wonder if there are any hulls that are particularly good or bad and which people would regard as the best option. If a Leander I plan one of the last conversions with Sea Wolf and towed array, many thanks.
Not sure if this is the right forum for this question or not but can anybody offer advice on pre-formed GRP hulls please. I am planning to build either a RN Type 12 or Leander class Frigate and wonder if there are any hulls that are particularly good or bad and which people would regard as the best option. If a Leander I plan one of the last conversions with Sea Wolf and towed array, many thanks.
- bismarck builder
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:28 am
- Location: alton hampshire uk
- JIM BAUMANN
- Posts: 5686
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:30 pm
- Location: Nr Southampton England
From what I have seen at the model shows--it is EXCELLENT--with beautiful PE
Cheers
Jim Baumann
Cheers
Jim Baumann
....I buy them at three times the speed I build 'em.... will I live long enough to empty my stash...?
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html
IPMS UK SIG (special interest group) www.finewaterline.com
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html
IPMS UK SIG (special interest group) www.finewaterline.com
- bismarck builder
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:28 am
- Location: alton hampshire uk
-
middle_watch
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: S Yorks, England
Second that, met Canmet the man at a show a couple of years ago when I was first thinking about getting into ship building and he was a terrific help and his 1/96 Type 12 hulls and fittings were just great. I never actually bought any as I was determined on a 1/72 Leander, but if I ever finish and build Scarborough which is on my wish list he will be my first port of call.
-
middle_watch
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: S Yorks, England
-
jjb
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am
-
middle_watch
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: S Yorks, England
I think the Seawolf was the ultimate Leander, Exocet, Seawolf, Lynx, STWS and half way decent CIWS, they could have really rounded them off of course with a Phallanx on the Hanger roof, but there you go, with a combat survival estimate of 20 minutes we "Leanderites" knew the government did not want to waste too much money on us 
Good luck with the build, whatever you decide, nice to know there are still plenty of Type 12 fans around.
Good luck with the build, whatever you decide, nice to know there are still plenty of Type 12 fans around.
-
jjb
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am
Yes, the last Leander conversion gave the RN probably 80% of the capability of a Type 22 at a fraction of the cost, they were extremely capable ships. As a youngster I hated the Leander conversions that lost the twin 4.5" guns but now I really appreciate the way the design evolved to meet requirements and carry ever more systems never imagined at the start of it's life, the final conversion was a massive increase in capability.
I love the Leanders and Type 12's on many levels,
-aesthetics, they were very elegant, attractive looking ships IMO, I do prefer the Leanders to the earlier nuclear fallout superstructure of early type 12's but both are nice.
-in many ways they were the finest ships produced by Britain post 1945 and were a superbly versatile and yet affordable type that also found a ready export market
-I like the way they demonstrated yet again that "affordable" doesn't have to mean incapable and that it is always better to build a sound basic design with upgrade potential than end up with a design with no real use by trying to achieve too much from the outset on an inadequate budget. Since the basic hull was so "right", these ships were suitable for all sorts of upgrades and additions. Something I see a parallel with in the current Type 45 design.
I love the Leanders and Type 12's on many levels,
-aesthetics, they were very elegant, attractive looking ships IMO, I do prefer the Leanders to the earlier nuclear fallout superstructure of early type 12's but both are nice.
-in many ways they were the finest ships produced by Britain post 1945 and were a superbly versatile and yet affordable type that also found a ready export market
-I like the way they demonstrated yet again that "affordable" doesn't have to mean incapable and that it is always better to build a sound basic design with upgrade potential than end up with a design with no real use by trying to achieve too much from the outset on an inadequate budget. Since the basic hull was so "right", these ships were suitable for all sorts of upgrades and additions. Something I see a parallel with in the current Type 45 design.