The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2629 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 ... 132  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:24 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Gateway to the Gorge, Oregon
BINGO. Thanks Tracy!!!!

I forget about that Fold3 site, maybe cause ya gotta pay. LOL.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 11:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
I pay a couple of grand a year to go to archives, so FOld3 is "cheap" in comparison and I have an annual subscription to save me time when I'm on site at archives. :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 11:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:24 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Gateway to the Gorge, Oregon
You have a passion Tracy, and its greatly appreciated!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
Well, it's also a big hang out party with friends now too. Hang out, research, talk history, have the shared experience of lunch made by the lowest bidder (government contract, but better than MREs by a bit). I really do have to start finishing books though.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
Tracy White wrote:
I can't remember which ship - I think it is Philippine Sea but I can't remember where the photos are or if they're online. It's post war, heading east through the Panama Canal, and a couple of the sponsons were cut off and set on the flight deck for the transit.


Found it! It was Philippine Sea. Note that these are not the starboard side sponsons but the quad 40mm "bumps" on the outboard side of the port-side sponson that replaced the catapult flipper. They're the two structures outboard of the left scout plane.


Attachments:
80-G-K-7577 (Philippine Sea Postwar Panama Canal).jpg
80-G-K-7577 (Philippine Sea Postwar Panama Canal).jpg [ 74.61 KiB | Viewed 3774 times ]

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 2:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
...


Last edited by anj4de on Wed Jan 10, 2018 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 3:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
anj4de wrote:
I guess this explains also why Intrepid's were cut of in that picture. I guess she is on her way from mothballs to an east coast yard to receive SCB-27? The 40mm positions are also gone!

Image

Image

cheers
Uwe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
Note that in the second, yard side photo, that the weld lines from the sponson that replaced the catapult flipper are visible (not strictly weld lines, just a rough cut not ground down). If you get a close enough photo you can see the same thing generally for the starboard side sponsons.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Hello all

Yesterday I receive a super thick Essex class book...that I spotted on a page for small adds where people sell all kind of stuff. It's absolutely huge, almost 500 pages, a lot of pictures, an extra map booklet and some plans of Randolph and Intrepid. Normally rather expensive I got it for 20 bucks...and it came in mint condition. It's this here...

https://www.amazon.com/Essex-Class-Carr ... 8360041490

I do not know how accurat it is yet since I have not taken a deeper dive into it but it has some nice, so far unknown, pictures in it. A few carriers are excellentely covered, Lexington for example, and guess which is the one with the worst coverage when it come to pictures...yes, of course...Hancock! :-(

The Lexington island pictures might be interesting for Steve in order to do the end of war version of his 3D island. I am also going to dive into another so far not too well documented section of the Essex class islands, the area around the aft Mk-37 director and the aft Mk.51 tub. Here the kits I have all seem to be wrong one way or the other...

cheers
Uwe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
I have a copy - it's too large for me to want to to through and do a page-by page review, but I did find problems. Lots of good content, don't get me wrong, but it's not 100% accurate and should serve merely as a starting point for questions.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 8:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Tracy White wrote:
I have a copy - it's too large for me to want to to through and do a page-by page review, but I did find problems. Lots of good content, don't get me wrong, but it's not 100% accurate and should serve merely as a starting point for questions.


Your observations go inline with what I have read about Trojka books in general. This is why I did not buy it so far...but when it popped up 2nd hand, well...
Speaking of books...when is the book of books on the Essex class going to be published? ;-)

cheers
Uwe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 8:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Hello all

Another question...or observation on Essex class islands...the main mast tripod! It appears that there are two versions of that one around, and early one with normal platforms and a later one with a re-enforcement with three oval cut outs. I have so far found out:
9, 10, 11, 16, 18 and 31 have the early version, from 12 on we see the re-enforced version. So basically all long hulls and later short hulls had the re-enforced version. Lexingon as far as I have seen so far is the only one that was "born" with the early tripod and was later modified to a re-enforced one BUT not of the same pattern as the others. It had only two roundish openings...
Researching this class is really exiting but can almost drive you insane. I do not think there were ever two ships identical at any time. Some examples for the masts

Early/simple mast platforms...here CV-10 Yorktown
Image

Re-enforced mast platform...here CV-12 Hornet
Image

Lexington special...as build and late war
Image
Image

I have a Dragon short hull in early configuration here half build, it's the hornet kit. Not sure yet which carrier it will be...but I want to use a 3D island for the first time.

cheers
Uwe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
anj4de wrote:
Researching this class is really exiting but can almost drive you insane. I do not think there were ever two ships identical at any time.


That's one reason why I decided early on to focus just on the WWII ships to start. It's at least "manageable." :heh:

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Another point of intrest is the area around the rear Mk.37 or better it's base. I am trying to find out if there was a direct passage way from the platform right behind the funnel to the director. In a lot of pictures it looks like it, then in others it looks like you have to crawl through the Mk.37 mount to get to the director. I only know one picture that clearly shows this area...and it's post war! :-( They also had alraedy removed the search light/20mm platform at that time. CV-17 Bunker Hill after they put the puzzle back together...

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2018 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:45 pm
Posts: 139
It's looks pretty clearly in this image on the Lexington that was posted above yours that the way into the director was through the open door at its base.


Attachments:
Lexington Aft Gun Director.png
Lexington Aft Gun Director.png [ 328.14 KiB | Viewed 3422 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:02 pm
Posts: 30
Hello Everyone,

I plan on using Trumpeter 1/700 kits to model USS Lexington in her post FEB 44 fit. Which would make more sense, updating an Essex or backdating a Franklin? I'm leaning toward the latter, mainly because the Franklin has a two-catapult flight deck. Would the island from the Essex kit work for Lexington or should I look at the 3D printed one instead?

Mike

_________________
Mike Bryant
Vicksburg, Mississippi


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 10448
Location: EG48
Start with the Franklin kit for the extra quad AA mounts as well. She retained the single quad 40mm mount on the stern at that time, though.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:02 pm
Posts: 30
Tracy White wrote:
Start with the Franklin kit for the extra quad AA mounts as well. She retained the single quad 40mm mount on the stern at that time, though.


That is the direction I am heading. I'm going to start with the Franklin and swap the island and single stern 40mm mount from the Essex kit. I wish Trumpeter was more like Dragon and wasn't as stingy with extra parts in their kits. One Sprue E from the Essex kit looks like all that you need to complete this.

_________________
Mike Bryant
Vicksburg, Mississippi


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:57 am
Posts: 13
Location: Manhattan
Hello,

I’m interesting in producing a model of Intrepid, representing her during the latter half of 1944. I’m pretty confident I know what the ship herself looked like. Where I am a little stuck is with the question: What tail or other markings did her airwing carry during this period?

Looking through my references I have three options:

Option one. A single white plus (+) sign applied to either side of the tail. This strikes me as the most likely.

Option two. A single white vertical stripe applied to either side of the tail, and a white stripe applied to the port wing. It is my understanding is that this was the marking adopted in 1945 and so is outside of the timeframe I’m hoping to represent.

Option three. A two digit number on the tail, underlined with a single horizontal white line. This is shown on the rear cover of the AOTS covering Intrepid. And is (unhelpfully) dated as 1944.

Any insight and or confirmation would be gratefully received.

Many thanks.

Adrian.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8159
Location: New Jersey
This is from Warships Perspectives, Essex Class Aircraft Carriers in World War Two, by Glenn R. Arnold. For discussion purposes only.
Attachment:
File comment: Warships Perspectives, Essex Class Aircraft Carriers in World War Two, by Glenn R. Arnold
IMG_1457.jpg
IMG_1457.jpg [ 1.57 MiB | Viewed 4479 times ]

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2629 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 ... 132  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group