The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:05 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 480 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:27 am
Posts: 823
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Understood, but maybe it's the eye of the beholder, or maybe expectation, but to me, you can detect a subtle difference in the shades, particularly where the light hits the aft edge of each funnel.

The lesser contrast could also be a result of the possible MBP repainting!

Anyway - I felt the same way as far as the historical significance of the earlier scheme! :big_grin:


Attachments:
File comment: Norfolk & Dorsetshire May 1941
2 sisters May 1941 -resized.jpg
2 sisters May 1941 -resized.jpg [ 189.65 KiB | Viewed 12426 times ]

_________________
Hard a starboard.......Shoot!
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2019 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 161
Hope I can get mine to look that nice! Are the top masts a lighter color?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
A new question:

Cumberland and Suffolk both had their quarterdeck cut down for weight reduction reasons, so far we all know. But when modelling these two ships from the Trumpeter kit, where exactly should the cut be made?
Attachment:
Stern Soffolk - Cumberland cutdown resized.jpg
Stern Soffolk - Cumberland cutdown resized.jpg [ 240.58 KiB | Viewed 12281 times ]

I made this drawing, in the process reconstructing the frame layout of these ships. I concluded the frames were spaced 4' between frame 27 and 141, and 3' in front of frame 27 and aft from 141 onwards. With these numbers LPP works out well, assumed that AP is one foot in front of the rudder axis.

In the little diagram to 1/350 scale I made this is all visible, and my question is: would this be a correct approach for making the cuts to the Trumpeter kit? And are the portholes or square shutters all in the correct locations?Maybe someone out there can point out the errors in my assumptions.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Last edited by Maarten Schönfeld on Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:27 am
Posts: 823
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
FRAMSailor wrote:
Hope I can get mine to look that nice! Are the top masts a lighter color?


Thanks, I'm sure you will and more! The topmasts are painted white - a common early WW2 RN practice, I believe.

_________________
Hard a starboard.......Shoot!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 337
Location: Laurieton , Australia
This is Cumberland, without making checks I am assuming the scuttles were equal port and strbd.
There are 6 scuttles forward of the shutters, with plates welded over them.
The qtrdeck rise begins just aft of the 6th scuttle.


Attachments:
CUMBERLAND.jpg
CUMBERLAND.jpg [ 272.88 KiB | Viewed 12261 times ]
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Brett Morrow wrote:
This is Cumberland, without making checks I am assuming the scuttles were equal port and strbd.
There are 6 scuttles forward of the shutters, with plates welded over them.
The quarterdeck rise begins just aft of the 6th scuttle.

Yes! That's correct. But the scuttles port and stbrd are not exactly the same, that part of your assumption is not correct. Also there are some differences between Suffolk and Cumberland.
As you can see I had drawn one extra scuttle in dashed line, that one is only on port, so your conclusion is right.
The welded plates are only added later on, I guess your image of Cumberland is from ca March 1943?

The extra scuttle AFT of the shutters seems to be unique to the portside of Cumberland, and is missing from the post-war pictures.

I revised the drawing slightly. About the shutters next to the Y turret I'm not quite certain, on many photos they seem to be missing.


Attachments:
Stern Soffolk - Cumberland cutdown resized2.jpg
Stern Soffolk - Cumberland cutdown resized2.jpg [ 232.06 KiB | Viewed 12160 times ]

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Something completely different: isn't 'County class' a bit strange name?

- Berwick isn't a county, but a town (in county Northumberland)
- London is better known as a city, then as a county
- Dorsetshire and Devonshire are old historical names, the counties are called Dorset and Devon, also at the time these ships were named
- Australia never was nor will ever be a county
- Canberra is a city and to my knowledge not a county.

So why do we call it the County class, with all these exceptions? Or worse, some even called it the 'Country class'!

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:33 am
Posts: 419
Minor detail - Berwick(shire) was a county, when the class was built - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berwickshire
"Devonshire" is/was often used colloquially, although "Devon" is/was usually used on official documentation.
"Dorsetshire" is a more archaic usage.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
tjstoneman wrote:
Minor detail - Berwick(shire) was a county, when the class was built - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berwickshire
"Devonshire" is/was often used colloquially, although "Devon" is/was usually used on official documentation.
"Dorsetshire" is a more archaic usage.

Hi tjstoneman,
Thank you for these corrections and annotations!

Berwick (without -shire) seems to refer only to the town, not to the historical Scottish county. And while the name givers bent themselves for Dorsetshire and Devonshire, why not then on Berwickshire?

It seems only English county/shire names were used for these ships, Welsh or Scottish counties weren't considered apparently. Maybe an indication of the English dominance in the Royal Navy? Or the use of traditional ship names for commemorative reasons, not uncommon in naval ships? But on the other hand, with the Town class the names were taken more liberally, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Belfast all being named in that class.

Berwick(-upon-Tweed) was already a town in England since 1551 (although long disputed by Scotland after that date.) It remained a county in its own right until 1885, and was included in Northumberland then. So by 1926 when this cruiser was commisioned there wasn't a county Berwick(shire) anymore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berwick-upon-Tweed

According to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Berwick all RN ships with the name Berwick refer to the town, not the county. But I know, Wikipedia is not always the right source!

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:09 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:53 am
Posts: 641
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Interesting digression indeed.
I'll go with ... tradition. It is true the ships had counties as their namesakes, but also, the names were a continuation of the name in the Royal Navy.
As such, I found that there were quite a few with the same quirck, just looking at the previous County (or Monmouth) class: apart from Berwick, there were also Bedford, Lancaster, and Monmouth herself for that matter.

_________________
Gernot Hassenpflug
Find out how it works, then functionality and limits


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Hi Gernot,

Yes, you are making certainly a good point. Thanks! These names would only make sense when -shire is added. And the Monmouth class was also dubbed the County class.

Maarten

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:35 pm
Posts: 2834
Location: UK
London was a county at that time; the LCC was the London County council.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_County_Council

According to this article the name Berwick comes from the WWI cruiser and is for the Scottish county (perhaps because the Monmouth Class ship was built in Scotland?):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Berwick_(1902)

_________________
In 1757 Admiral John Byng was shot "pour encourager les autres". Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:44 pm
Posts: 650
Location: UK
Berwick was a county at the time of the WW2 era County Class cruiser HMS Berwick:

https://www.undiscoveredscotland.co.uk/ ... shire.html

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov. ... /c/F269524


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Dick and Admiral John Byng,

Thanks for your further clarification!

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2019 9:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:36 am
Posts: 9
Just got trumpeter’s HMS Cornwell today, was wondering if out of the box represents her configuration when she was sunk?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 2207
Location: Monson, MA.
Aoshima is coming out with a correct 1/700 scale Dorsetshire, and a Cornwall kits. The Cornwall kit has the pleasant addition of an S-Class DD kit included. ETA, towards the end of this year!





Bob Pink. :wave_1:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
Posts: 1775
Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Crossy77 wrote:
Just got trumpeter’s HMS Cornwell today, was wondering if out of the box represents her configuration when she was sunk?

I believe the answer is yes, although her colours were AP507B instead of AP507C by that time.

_________________
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 10, 2019 7:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:36 am
Posts: 9
Maarten Schönfeld wrote:
Crossy77 wrote:
Just got trumpeter’s HMS Cornwell today, was wondering if out of the box represents her configuration when she was sunk?

I believe the answer is yes, although her colours were AP507B instead of AP507C by that time.


Thanks heaps mate,

I’m pretty new to ship modelling, and do apologise if this has been asked before, is there a testors MM match for AP507b?

Regards


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 10, 2019 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 337
Location: Laurieton , Australia
May I suggest an alternative, the Sovereign hobbies RN colour range may be a better choice.
At the time of her loss she would have been in NARN 20 (507A/B), but she may also have been in NARN 24 (507A/C 50mix)
Dick or James may be able to elaborate further.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 10, 2019 7:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 5:36 am
Posts: 9
Brett Morrow wrote:
May I suggest an alternative, the Sovereign hobbies RN colour range may be a better choice.
At the time of her loss she would have been in NARN 20 (507A/B), but she may also have been in NARN 24 (507A/C 50mix)
Dick or James may be able to elaborate further.

Thanks heaps mate, I can get that paint range.
Just a couple of questions,
what colour is the blue/ grey deck colour?
When you say 507A/B is that 2 different colours?
I’ve sprayed sovereignty paints before(just MM are the local paints with tamiya and Gunze) what thinners and thinning ratio do you use?

Thanks heaps


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 480 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group