Calling all HMS "Mighty" Hood fans

Battleships and Battlecruisers of all nations and eras.
BB and BC.

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
Dino Carancini
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:46 am

Post by Dino Carancini »

Updated Mr Thomas Schmid 3D rendering on the Hood association website:

http://www.hmshood.com/photos/hoodphotos3.htm
User avatar
coaster
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:28 am
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Post by coaster »

Just had a look at Eduard's new set for Hood - Interesting. I already have WEM's but may get the Eddy as well for a back up for my inevitavble clumsiness... and the bits that WEM's doesn't have.
Fraser
website http://fjmayart.com/index.html
in progress,
scratch build 70' Mtb
1/700th Kalinin
User avatar
largeallan
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Ayr, On Scotland's sunshine coast

Post by largeallan »

I'm still hangin' on which PE set to buy......can't justify buying more than one for a �70 model, so I'm waiting for this thread to move along to get more feedback on what the sets are like.....never knew Eduard had one so I'll have a look there too :thumbs_up_1:
User avatar
Dave Martin
Posts: 507
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: DERBYSHIRE UK

Post by Dave Martin »

I've just bought the GMM set, and have added a cheap WEM 'Second Quality' set for back-up and inevitable balls-ups!

Never done any PE work before so I'm not looking forward to it.
User avatar
MartinJQuinn
Posts: 8544
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Post by MartinJQuinn »

Dave Martin wrote:Never done any PE work before so I'm not looking forward to it.
Don't feel that way - just take your time and it will go alright.
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery
Anonymous

HMS MIGHTY HOOD

Post by Anonymous »

My favourite period for HMS HOOD , is 1937 , when she was painted in AP507C, with Spanish Civil War stripes on B turret.She looked great!
User avatar
Richard Durham
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:47 pm
Location: San Diego CA

1/350 Trumpeter HMS HOOD Finished

Post by Richard Durham »

This is Trumpeter�s 1/350 HMS HOOD in the May 1941 configuration and in my opinion; it is an absolute jewel of a kit. I added the brass barrels from the Trumpeter HOOD Upgrade Set and used the Gold Medal Models HOOD Photoetch set.

The GMM set fit perfectly and included precut and sized ladders and railing. The photoetch pieces for the pom-poms, forward mast and the quad .50 guns are spectacular. I estimate that I only used about 30 % of the photoetch available in the GMM set as the set is incredibly over complete.

The model was primed with GUNZE Flat Gray and painted with Model Master Acryl paints, using FS 36320, Dark Ghost Gray, for the hull and vertical surfaces color. I used FS 30117, Earth Red, for the Corticene covered decks and FS 36176, Dark Gray (F-15) for the portions of the decks that were dark gray. I like using Model Master Acryl because of ease of hand painting detail work and touch up.

The aft upper mast has been replaced with bronze rod and stainless steel tube. The flag is from the GMM Flag decal sheet. The rigging is Dia Riki 7x monofilament tippet.

Although the kit flag decals went on easy enough and looked good, they were not stiff enough to maintain their shape and had to removed and replaced.

The base is made from 1 by 8 red oak that was cut and routed by me. The water is made with a piece of flat clear acrylic sheet, painted flat white on the bottom and painted with a light/irregular coat of Phthalocyanine Blue on top. The blue is covered with Liquitex Gloss Heavy Gel Medium to simulate waves and the ship wake. I highlighted the waves and wake with Titanium White. This process gives a sense of depth to the water and is quick and easy. I attached the acrylic sheet to the base with 5 min epoxy. I don�t take a lot of effort to simulate other water effects as I view it as more of model base than a seascape.

My 3 references were the fabulous HMS HOOD Association website, Steve Wiper�s �Warship Pictorial 20 HMS HOOD� and finally, one of the best ship reference books ever written, �The Battlecruiser HMS Hood, An Illustrated Biography 1916-1941� by Bruce Taylor.
Rich

http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%205.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%206.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%207.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%208.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%209.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%2010.jpg
http://members.cox.net/rwdurham3/HOOD%20350%2011.jpg
User avatar
largeallan
Posts: 107
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Ayr, On Scotland's sunshine coast

Post by largeallan »

Seems like a bit of a daft question really, BUT......is the waterline on the trumpy Hood accurate for 1941? i.e is the top of the red plastic lower hull exactly where the top of the boot topping should be?

Thanks, Al
User avatar
Jefgte
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:53 am
Location: France

Post by Jefgte »

What a nice Hood model

:thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:

We can see the lockers for the 4" shells & the pom-pom every where on the lifeboat deck.

What a dangerous installation - Engineers think certainly that the enemy shells are snow balls...



Jef
Current 1/700 WL
HMS Repulse
Tracy White
Posts: 10624
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Post by Tracy White »

Jefgte wrote:What a dangerous installation - Engineers think certainly that the enemy shells are snow balls...
THose are what were termed "Ready Service Lockers" in US parlance... a relatively small amount of ammunition was kept on deck as the firing rate of these guns outstripped what the ammunition elevators could transfer and it was necessary to keep a stock nearby the guns... one does not want to run out of snowbals early in the fight!

For the the smaller ammunition, a cook-off due to an enemy could be dangerous to the nearby crew, but it was not all that dangerous to the nearby structure. The US Navy actually removed sprinkler systems from 20mm clipping rooms on the Essex carriers late in the war to save topside weight after it was found that a fire in this space producing ammunition cook-off wasn't "that" harmfull.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
User avatar
Jefgte
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:53 am
Location: France

Post by Jefgte »

I know that Tracy & I agree with you

I just speak about the lockers alone on the deck, they could certainly be disposed against the uper works to have a relative protection.

Perhaps a better place is in the ceiling of the gallery under the AA armament where were the 5"5 guns.

...or install the lockers in the uperworks directly...



Jef :wave_1:
Current 1/700 WL
HMS Repulse
User avatar
Miguel
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi

Post by Miguel »

Last edited by Miguel on Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

It's nice to see all the recent discoveries in the newly etched parts.
User avatar
Miguel
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi

Post by Miguel »

Foeth_ wrote:It's nice to see all the recent discoveries in the newly etched parts.
:scratch:
The WEM PE is almost 7 years old and the Eduard is around 4 to 5
,the Clipper barrels close to 5 ,the only new stuff I'm using are the Lion Roar barrels for the 4 inchers(actually 5 inch,but they look great),the rest are hypodermic syringes and scrap metal
:wave_1:
Last edited by Miguel on Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dino Carancini
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:46 am

Post by Dino Carancini »

Miguel your Hood is coming along very nice :thumbs_up_1:

The 4" HA mounts and the wood deck are my favorites!

Dino
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

The WEM PE is almost 7 years old and the Eduard is around 4 to 5
I only recently discovered the correct shape of the UP launcher splinter shield on B-turret as you have it now and the shape of the detail on X-turret. This was not correct in any of the older etch sets or drawings. Perhaps you added the corrections yourself?
User avatar
Miguel
Posts: 1562
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi

Post by Miguel »

Foeth_ wrote:
I only recently discovered the correct shape of the UP launcher splinter shield on B-turret as you have it now and the shape of the detail on X-turret. This was not correct in any of the older etch sets or drawings. Perhaps you added the corrections yourself?
You are right,mainly with the help of the marvelous Hood Association web page I'm correcting some issues of the Tamiya model(is a crap,I'm waiting for the Trump Hood 1931) :smallsmile:
User avatar
coaster
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:28 am
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Post by coaster »

Great to see some builds under way. I'm still trying to decide whether or not to build her with a full hull or waterline. Both options have their attraction...sigh. Generally I prefer waterline since that's how you normally see a ship...but the shape of Hoods under hull is fascinating...
Fraser
website http://fjmayart.com/index.html
in progress,
scratch build 70' Mtb
1/700th Kalinin
User avatar
johndon
Posts: 1033
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:39 pm
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England

Post by johndon »

More PE on the way for the Hood: http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/detai ... 3020.shtml

John
Post Reply

Return to “Battleships”