Calling all Essex-class (WWII configuration) fans

Carriers of all Nations and eras
CV, CVA, CVE, CVL, CVA, CVS, CVN.

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
User avatar
Timmy C
Posts: 12447
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Timmy C »

The SK-2 outboard-of-funnel position can be seen in this photo of Franklin: http://www.history.navy.mil/pics2/frank ... r56-14.jpg
De quoi s'agit-il?
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

Timmy C wrote:The SK-2 outboard-of-funnel position can be seen in this photo of Franklin: http://www.history.navy.mil/pics2/frank ... r56-14.jpg
IKES!
The pic is added to my library because you are right it does show the SK-2 position well, but man that's not all it shows. No doubt there is a romantacism associated with ships, especially as ship modelers. This picture reminds you how terrifying the reality of it really was.
THANKS!
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
grayson72
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by grayson72 »

Hi guys, some of you may have seen my build log of LPH-5 USS Princeton. I need to update the superstructure with covered bridge sections that contain many windows.

Does anyone have some tips for scratching these windows (actually the frames)?
I've purchased some N Scale Plastruct ladders but even they look a little large for my purposes.


Thanks in advance.
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

grayson72 wrote:Hi guys, some of you may have seen my build log of LPH-5 USS Princeton. I need to update the superstructure with covered bridge sections that contain many windows.

Does anyone have some tips for scratching these windows (actually the frames)?
I've purchased some N Scale Plastruct ladders but even they look a little large for my purposes.


Thanks in advance.
I think I recall reading somewhere that someone used 1/700 scale ladders for 1/350 window frames, but I wouldn't swear they were 1/700.
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
grayson72
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:57 pm

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by grayson72 »

Rdutnell wrote:
grayson72 wrote:Hi guys, some of you may have seen my build log of LPH-5 USS Princeton. I need to update the superstructure with covered bridge sections that contain many windows.

Does anyone have some tips for scratching these windows (actually the frames)?
I've purchased some N Scale Plastruct ladders but even they look a little large for my purposes.


Thanks in advance.
I think I recall reading somewhere that someone used 1/700 scale ladders for 1/350 window frames, but I wouldn't swear they were 1/700.
Well I know people use 1/350 PE ladders for 1/700 windows. So it seems like those would be too small.

The width of the ladders that I have are a little too wide (thereby making the windows too tall). I was thinking I could cut one side of them off along with some of the width on the rails and then glue a new strip of styrene back on.
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

grayson72 wrote: Well I know people use 1/350 PE ladders for 1/700 windows. So it seems like those would be too small.

The width of the ladders that I have are a little too wide (thereby making the windows too tall). I was thinking I could cut one side of them off along with some of the width on the rails and then glue a new strip of styrene back on.
I told you I wouldn't swear to it. I guess I had it bassackwards.
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
Tracy White
Posts: 10621
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Tracy White »

Rdutnell wrote:No doubt there is a romantacism associated with ships, especially as ship modelers. This picture reminds you how terrifying the reality of it really was.
If that interests you, you should read the damage reports I've posted online:
CV-13 Franklin October 1944 Damage Reports - (Ship & Shipyard reports)
CV-13 Franklin October '44 & March '45 Report (Bureau of Ships)

Also:
CV-11 Intrepid handling after Torpedo damage
CV-12 Hornet Forward Flight Deck Collapse in Typhoon
CV-14 Ticonderoga January 1945 Kamikaze damage
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

In the first link it reads...

"With a loud roar and blast of flame the bomb exploded, wrenching upwards the edges of a hole 30 by 35 feet in diameter. Shrapnel tore through the galley and hangar deck spaces..."

This must be the more generic form of shrapnel and not true shrapnel.

Great stuff! Thanks for the links!
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
Tracy White
Posts: 10621
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Tracy White »

Rdutnell wrote:Shrapnel tore through the galley and hangar deck spaces..."
Heh... that was actually the first thing I did on my site... about seven years ago. Didn't know as much as I know now, and I haven't gone back to update text. Seems better to work on adding new stuff....

But I'll fix that one ;)
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
Russ2146
Posts: 2126
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: Egg Harbor Twp, NJ

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Russ2146 »

Shrapnel's shells, filled with musket balls, released them above the target, allowing them to carry on with the "remaining velocity" of the shell. If the point on the trajectory at which the shells burst was well-chosen the balls would reach the target with lethal velocity. They were simply hollow cast-iron spheres filled with a mixture of balls and powder, with a crude time fuze, but they increased the effective range of case from 300 to about 1100 meters.

During World War I, shrapnel was widely used by all sides to cut the barbed wire entanglements in no man's land as a precursor to an attack. Shrapnel's effectiveness for wire cutting was enhanced by the widespread introduction of the French percussion fuse (known to the British as the No. 106 fuse) which ensured the shell detonated immediately on contact with the ground, rather than after it had buried itself.

As explosives improved it was found that a properly designed shell casing fragmented so effectively that additional shot was not required, and during World War II shrapnel, in the strict sense of the word, fell out of use.

Thus, currently, Fragments from an exploded artillery shell, mine, or bomb, and I would suggest metal fragments arising from a metalic target object in or against which the above named devices explode.
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

Does any one know where parts B23 and B27 in Trumpeter's 1/350 Essex go? I can't find them in the plans anywhere. Surely, they didn't make parts that aren't needed.
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
User avatar
Timmy C
Posts: 12447
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Timmy C »

Is the B Sprue in the CV 14 kit the same as in the Essex kit? If so, they look to me like they're a pair of rectangular deck-edge tubs for two 20mm guns.

Model companies often include parts that are not meant to be used in a by-the-instructions build - it's cheaper to include some extra plastic than to change the molds to exclude unnecessary parts.
De quoi s'agit-il?
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

Timmy C wrote:Is the B Sprue in the CV 14 kit the same as in the Essex kit? If so, they look to me like they're a pair of rectangular deck-edge tubs for two 20mm guns.

Model companies often include parts that are not meant to be used in a by-the-instructions build - it's cheaper to include some extra plastic than to change the molds to exclude unnecessary parts.
Yep, those are the parts, and I thought they were deck edge tubs, but they don't show up on plans or any of the pix I've been looking at.

I've seen extra parts in kits before, but usually on duplicate sprews.

Thanks for the response! I got my answer, I'm not insane after all. I must have looked at the plans 10 times thinking I must just be missing it. Then I looked at a bunch of pictures and still couldn't figure out where they could possibly go.
Do the parts in question have a spot on the Franklin? If so, the sprew may be used in both models, so they get to cut their costs, like you say.
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
User avatar
Timmy C
Posts: 12447
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Timmy C »

Yep, they're called out in the Franklin kit - at least, the parts for them are no longer on the sprue in the box of my built-up Franklin, haha.
De quoi s'agit-il?
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

Definitely a good sign!!!
:thumbs_up_1:
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

WOW!
I just learned two things that I didn't know from one picture on Ray Bean's Essex 2 DVD, which I have reduced and copied before (I hope this is OK). First, I didn't know they actually operated the elevators at the same time as aircraft were landing and second, I didn't know they raised or lowere planes with their engines running and props turning. Hmmmmm!
LEXINGTON RECOVER AC OCT 1944-small.jpg
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
User avatar
pbudzik
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:40 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by pbudzik »

Judging from the amount of prop blur compared to the other two aircraft in the photo, the prop isn't turning very fast.

Paul
User avatar
Hippy Ed
Posts: 2013
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: Calif
Contact:

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Hippy Ed »

pbudzik wrote:Judging from the amount of prop blur compared to the other two aircraft in the photo, the prop isn't turning very fast.

Paul
Roger that. Looks like they are putting it down below as they come in in order to clear the deck before the rest of the air wing come in...
If ya lose yer sense of humor...
You've lost everything...

On the Bench:
1/720 Italeri CVN-68 ca 1976/77
1/800 ARii 1/800 CV-59 backdating to 1961 (CVA-59)
1/700Trumpy USS Hornet CV-8 "Doolittle Raiders"
Tracy White
Posts: 10621
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Tracy White »

Yes, they obviously wouldn't run the engines at take off power while on the elevator :P

One of the advantages of the roller-door design of the post-Lexington class US carriers was that they could ventilate enough to run the engines inside. This was mainly done during warm ups, but in this case, they could also keep them running if it was convenient while putting them below.

It's all about op tempo (operational speed); the faster you can recover and re-spot the deck the quicker you can react. We had refueling stations on the bow and stern, for example, so that as the aircraft landed up front they could be refueled as others were landing behind them. This would continue until everything was down, at which point they would start pushing everything back to re-spot for the next strike. The last aircraft down would be refueled at the stern, that way they didn't have to wait until all of them were refueled to run them back, or start refueling the entire air group only after they were all re-spotted astern. Along with this, aircraft who needed to be pulled for maintenance or repair could be sent below as they were being recovered, so that they weren't in the way when they were trying to re-spot the others for the next strike.

Deck design was more important then most think, and it's one reason that we emerged as such a power house after the war; no one has the experience with large-deck air groups operating with the same cycle speed that we did.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
User avatar
Rdutnell
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:11 pm
Location: Norman, Oklahoma

Re: Calling all WWII Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Rdutnell »

I have a couple of questions that hopefully someone here will be able to answer.

First, on the Bennington and other Essex class carriers, the front quad 40mm was removed to allow for modifications to the island. I notice that the tower that contained the radar for the quad seems to have remained. What was it used for? Was there anything in the tub, since obviously the radar wasn't necessary?

Second, the Trumpeter 1/350 Essex kit has a platform for the utility boat (Part A15), but from photos I have seen (which aren't very good) it looks like the boat is suspended by cable or rope. How were they really suspended?
Completed:
1/350 USS Missouri (BB-63) * 1/350 USS England (DE-635) * "Underway Personnel Transfer" Diorama

In Progress:
1/350 USS Bennington (CV-20)
1/144 USS Greenling (SSN-614) - ACAD/3D Printing
1/144 USS Batfish (SS-310) - ACAD/3D Printing
Post Reply

Return to “Aircraft Carriers”