Calling all Spruance-class DD fans

Destroyers and Destroyer Escorts of all nations and eras.
DD, DDE, DE, FF, FFG, and DDR.

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
User avatar
Devin
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:46 am
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Contact:

Post by Devin »

Tracy White wrote:All aboard for Spru-cans! I've got a kit I want to use to do Hancock. I just love the stern.
I assume they did not do as is the norm and weld the name on the stern for that ship? That would be some metal work!

-Devin
We like our history sanitized and theme-parked and self-congratulatory, not bloody and angry and unflattering. - Jonathan Yardley
Tracy White
Posts: 10617
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Post by Tracy White »

I can't answer that; that's the best picture of her stern I ever found.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
User avatar
brandon
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:37 am
Location: Belgium/Ardennen

Post by brandon »

Good afternoon

Please give me your private mail so I can send some pics as from the start till now this afternoon

Regards and have a good weekend
:thumbs_up_1:
Wim

jgrease wrote:I will post pics and stuff as I go. Be sure to post yours as well.
blandcorporation
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:33 am

Spruance refits

Post by blandcorporation »

Does anyone have any details on the refits the Sprucans have received over the years? I am most curious about the VLS and the additional deckhouses that appear on top of the ships late in their career. Did the VLS cells only carry Tomahawks, or could they also carry ASROCs or Harpoons? What were all these additional deckhouses built for, and why was the aft CIWS platform raised an additional deck? Also, why were some hangar decks expanded on both sides of the ship and some only expanded on their starboard side?

I'm building a Cushing in 2005, prior to her decommisioning.
User avatar
brandon
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:37 am
Location: Belgium/Ardennen

Re: Spruance refits

Post by brandon »

Sorry thast I can not help you with your request but maybe you are able to help me. I am nerly finished with the Cushing its the Dragon kit 1:350 I would like to know what is happened with the vessel after her decommissioning in dec. 2005 do you know that??

I like the Spruance class very well I still have to build another 6 all of the Dragon on 1:350

Looking forward and thanks

regards

Wim


have received over the years? I am most curious about the VLS and the additional deckhouses that appear on top of the ships late in their career. Did the VLS cells only carry Tomahawks, or could they also carry ASROCs or Harpoons? What were all these additional deckhouses built for, and why was the aft CIWS platform raised an additional deck? Also, why were some hangar decks expanded on both sides of the ship and some only expanded on their starboard side?

I'm building a Cushing in 2005, prior to her decommisioning.[/quote]
blandcorporation
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:33 am

Post by blandcorporation »

According to Navysite.de, as of 2006, the Cushing is at the "Naval Inactive Ships Maintenance Facility in Pearl Harbor, HI", so its to the northwest of Ford Island.
Charles Landrum
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:21 pm

SPRUANCE Answers

Post by Charles Landrum »

I was the operations officer of USS HAYLER DD-997 when we went into refit and did the installs/conversion asked about - the conversion was comprehensive and complex. Here is the run down:

The mechanical ASROC was removed and replaced by the vertical launching system (VLS) that could handle Tomahawk and vertically launched ASROC (VLA). It could handle Standard Missile but since there was no associated fire control system, it was not done. Harpoon was never redesigned for vertical launch.

The ASW system received a significant upgrade: added was the SQQ-19 towed array SONAR (fairlead chock cut into the transom - the "golden sphincter"), receiver/processing capability for the SH-60B helo, upgraded SQS-53 SONAR.

The electronic warfare system was upgraded to add an active capability - SLQ-32 V3. The main antennas were moved to the after superstructure and the band one antennas moved from the forward mast to the 04 level platforms on the forward superstructure formerly occupied by the main antennas. This part of the conversion accounted for many of the new deck houses aft.

The CIWS were put into revetted enclosures to move much routine maintenance out of the weather. The aft "pagoda" structure was built to accomodate the relocated SLQ antenna and still providing good visibility for both systems.

The hangar was widened on the port sides, with Sonabouy storerooms added on the starboard side - so the outward appearance was balanced. Not all Spruances received this extra storage area on the starboard side(funding issue), but on the either ships the hangar dimensions were the same and could accommodate two SH-60 helos. Also the RAST system was added, which included the addition of the tracks to convey the SH-60 in and out of the hangar. Some of the first ships modified only received one track, unsure why.

That is it in a nutshell, there were only two decks unaffected, the NATO Seasparrow deck and the Harpoon deck.
User avatar
brandon
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:37 am
Location: Belgium/Ardennen

Cushing

Post by brandon »

Thanks for reply.e there any photo's available of her??

thanks and regards

Wim
blandcorporation wrote:According to Navysite.de, as of 2006, the Cushing is at the "Naval Inactive Ships Maintenance Facility in Pearl Harbor, HI", so its to the northwest of Ford Island.
Tracy White
Posts: 10617
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: Cushing

Post by Tracy White »

brandon wrote:Thanks for reply.e there any photo's available of her??
Have you looked?
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
blandcorporation
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:33 am

Post by blandcorporation »

Brandon, aside from the article on the Cushing on navysite.de, I go the the official Navy website, navy.mil, and do a search for cushing in the Navy NewsStand photo galleries. Also i go to the The Defense Visual Information Center, http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil/ but that site isnt working right now.
blandcorporation
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:33 am

Post by blandcorporation »

Oh, and Charles, thanks for all that info. Now I know what I'm scratching. By the way, I took the hangar extensions off a Chandler Kidd class kit, as well as a couple additional deckhouses.
Magnus

Decals in the Dragon USS Cushing - E with dash - what is it?

Post by Magnus »

In the Dragon kit of the Cushing, there are a number of decals that are not mentioned in the instructions. Quite a few of them are an 'E' with dashes.

What are these decals? Can I use them on my Cushing, and if, how?

/Magnus
User avatar
brandon
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:37 am
Location: Belgium/Ardennen

Re: Decals in the Dragon USS Cushing - E with dash - what is

Post by brandon »

Magnus

I haven't done it I just kept it on the instructions what they say as I am totally unknown in this class Its was my first one but like to build some more

Regards

Wim


Magnus wrote:In the Dragon kit of the Cushing, there are a number of decals that are not mentioned in the instructions. Quite a few of them are an 'E' with dashes.

What are these decals? Can I use them on my Cushing, and if, how?

/Magnus
blandcorporation
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:33 am

Post by blandcorporation »

Theres an explanation here:

http://www.navysite.de/what/bridgewing.htm
Tracy White
Posts: 10617
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Post by Tracy White »

On the way out to a client's office today I passed by Bremerton... stopped off by the side of the freeway and snapped this shot of an unknown Spru-Can:

Image

Sad.....
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
User avatar
Seasick
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:58 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Spruance class DD with an eight inch gun

Post by Seasick »

A Spruance DD with a Mk71 203mm/55 Major Caliber Light Weight Gun.


Image
???????
? Seasick?
???????
User avatar
jgrease
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: Richmond TX

Spruance-class walkarounds?

Post by jgrease »

Are there any websites with good-quality detail shots of ANY Spruance-class ship? I guess I got spoiled working on a Sovremenny - there were quite a few good walkarounds available. I've been to all of the standard websites, and most shots are full-length shots of the various ships in class. I'd like closer shots of the decks, structures, etc. Anyone have any ideas? BTW- the Defense Visual Info Centre has not been responding to qeries lately.
User avatar
Mac
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:16 pm

Post by Mac »

DVIC has problems every couple of weeks. I suggest you keep trying until it's back up. It has tons of Spruance class photos.

Mac
User avatar
Avery Boyer
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Berks County, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by Avery Boyer »

Tracy: that Spru-can is probably David R Ray.
"It is best to remain silent and let others assume you are dumb than to speak up and remove all doubt"

http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Seasick
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:58 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by Seasick »

Spruance class DD with a scratch built 203mm Mk71 MCLWG on the bow.
Image
Last edited by Seasick on Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
???????
? Seasick?
???????
Post Reply

Return to “Destroyers and Frigates”