Re: Scratch Building the Portuguese Carrack in 1/700th Scale
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:57 am
Great work! These are really coming to life!
The Ship Modelers Source
http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/
Thank you sir!Timmy C wrote:*whimper* it's miraculous!
Hmm... sounds interesting. I am a huge Yes fan and also like Toto (a lot) and Rush somewhat. Toto can be really heavy, particularly on their recent stuff. The closest I think I've heard to symphonic metal is probably Dream Theater, which I heard while in college in the early 90s. I don't really know if that qualifies or not, but I've been out of the Pop Music stream for some time. I've got nothing against heavy guitars, but don't like the negativity of most metal. These days it's mostly 20th Century Symphonic, Baroque, or something Ethnic/World Music, etc.Timmy C wrote:In regards to Cyrano, the Turkish symphonic metal band Almora made a song for it, if you're interested: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yuhAV9HkWE
That would be a great idea Jim... if I hadn't already glued, and re-glued and re-glued the yards at about 5 degrees from perpendicular. Even at that angle I've got issues between the mainsail yard and the mainmast shrouds. How did they deal with that anyway? Did the yard just push into the shrouds or what? I'm not happy with my wave pattern, actually. I used this great new gel that really holds the brush strokes well after drying, but I did it hastily and somewhat clumsily, with the result that they look more like brush strokes than waves (no discernible axis to the wave direction.) I'm thinking of attempting to correct this with another layer of waves which would deepen the water but also give the effect of depth and clarity, at least to a point. I thought about the problem you brought up, i.e. that the calm water does not justify a strong wind needed to account for the sort of bulging sails I want to do. Deepening the waves would give me the opportunity to correct the wave pattern axis and perhaps also justify fuller sails. Would welcome your comments on a solution.JIM BAUMANN wrote:definitely add sails!-- however-- have the wind coming from a quarter-so that the yards are braced around 25 deg from the centreline-this will show the rigging even more effectively--as the rigging will show against the light background of the sails.
You do not need much ' wind'...( your flat sea and lack of heel precludes this currently) just enough to give steergae....
the shield's aft--very innovative and well carried out!![]()
![]()
![]()
JIM B
Thank you Michel! I hope to finish her soon.MichelB wrote:Great work! These are really coming to life!
Thanks Tim! Thanks for dropping by. They were a bit tedious. A lot of ideas I come up with sound more fun before I actually start doing them... but they didn't take as long as I feared they would.Cadman wrote:Wow, that is a lot of work for those a tiny little shield. But the result is amazing. Great work Callen.
Hello Neal and Folkscallen wrote:Ok. That's all for now. Bruno just sent me proofs for his home-made PE set for the carracks. I am extatic! I am going to ask him if he'll allow me to post them here so everyone can see.









Wow. Thank you Ron. To think that a modeler like you has been there... that is consolation indeed. Much appreciated my friend.ARH wrote:Callen, I feel your pain, bean there , done that, got the T shirt, but did not get a prize, thanks for all the wonderfull posts,![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Timmy C wrote:It could have been worse, Neal - the winning entry could've been a perfectly assembled and airbrushed infantry landing craft that took the builder all of two hours to make. At least the four-piper and Mikasa would actually take some work! It is unfortunate that IPMS rules are based primarily on fit and finish first, and detailing and accuracy far seconds; but I suppose that's the only fair way about it.
Thanks Tim. You, Jim and Ron are a shot in the arm... Definitely came home from the contest a little deflated, I can tell you.Timmy C wrote:Regardless, totally impressed by and floored with your work!
Thank you sir. Most appreciated.JIM BAUMANN wrote:Competitions....
Its all in the eye of beholder and bias of judge...
I think you vessel is very fine indeed...-- very teeny and very intricate!
Well now see, that's the funny thing because I always think the other guy's builds are better than mine... I don't know why... I guess staring at the same piece of plastic for nine months straight you get kind of jaded with it.JIM BAUMANN wrote:I too have entered models in competition that I felt were the last word in fine-scale...
and been 'surprised ' when...in my view--a lesser model won the gold ...
JIM BAUMANN wrote:Its all fun really... not serious like... getting it accurate!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for the tip, Jim. I will check that out. I use Locktite CA and it works pretty well in most applications, it even dries flat instead of gloss, which is a nice feature, but I was forced to overglue the ratlines in order to get them to stick... I was getting both impatient and desperate for time... looking back on it, I think that is the one really obvious flaw of the build... don't get me wrong the glue bits are tiny, but if you look close you can see them. They're even visible in some of the above photos. I don't think I really need to go any further than that to look for a reason why I didn't place. I will check out your glue though. I'm interested to see if it works better.JIM BAUMANN wrote:Apropos ratlines...
Here is a technique worth a try...
Rig up your shrouds as described...
use stretched sprue as your foot ropes-- the plastic Revell contact adhesive dries matt and the shroud ends
will be exactly flush with the shrouds
JB
see here for more description of the glue and its uses...
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=37536