so which of them thought of this

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: so which of them thought of this

Re: so which of them thought of this

by Werner » Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:18 pm

chuck wrote:
Charlestonguy wrote:England is just not England without a Queen.

Nah, just the dreary weather alone is enough to make England.
What's Ireland (or the Midwest USA) for that matter?

If climate change brings resort weather, I'm all for it. Right now (9PM) it's 10C and dropping. It's rained or snowed most of the month so far.

Re: so which of them thought of this

by winstonshu » Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:10 pm

is this article supposed to be ironic?

i mean, syria and iran complaining about how the UK treats people? seriously?

-iran- complaining about how england deals with sexual discrimination?

Re: so which of them thought of this

by RNfanDan » Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:00 am

Charlestonguy wrote:England is just not England without a Queen.
Well, the Scots seem to have adapted after losing theirs, thus far....
:heh:

Re: so which of them thought of this

by chuck » Sat Jun 14, 2008 2:40 am

Charlestonguy wrote:England is just not England without a Queen.

Nah, just the dreary weather alone is enough to make England. :big_grin:

Re: so which of them thought of this

by Charlestonguy » Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:34 pm

England is just not England without a Queen.

Re: so which of them thought of this

by ASFC » Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:56 pm

I was just taking examples from the article, I don't actually know this Human Rights Council Membership, and i didn't say that was a conclusive list I provided when it comes to Human Rights records (indeed, Russia still has questions to answer about it own purges during communist times, and i'm sure every country has something to answer), but still this won't get taken seriously here in the UK, because it will be noted that some of these countries have much bigger problems of their own to deal with when it comes to Human Rights.

So far this news story (if it is one :heh: ) seems to have passed Auntie Beeb by though, its not on their website...........

Re: so which of them thought of this

by Filipe Ramires » Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:30 pm

ASFC wrote:This lacks crediability-I don't see how a Human Rights Council that has the likes of Iran, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Syria And Sri Lanka, all with worse records than the UK, can expect this to be taken seriously! :mad_1:
Oh, but they can start by scouting for that kind of troubles if they just look to some of the Top UN countries. Mao's legacy is still in power and his "crimes" are yet to be checked...and I don't think they will be any time soon!!!

Re: so which of them thought of this

by ASFC » Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:19 pm

This lacks crediability-I don't see how a Human Rights Council that has the likes of Iran, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Syria And Sri Lanka, all with worse records than the UK, can expect this to be taken seriously! :mad_1:

Re: so which of them thought of this

by Werner » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:21 pm

I don't see how the UN can use the word "must" on any purely domestic issue that doesn't involve human rights.

A bunch of fools.

so which of them thought of this

by Guest » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:32 pm

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/itn/20080613/t ... a1618.html

A late april fool maybe???

Treason is all i can say :mad_1:

Top