unusual axis ships

Naval History and the Technology associated with it.

Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes

User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Post by Werner »

Anonymous wrote:Okay, I grant you that Oyoda was intended to be headquarter to submarine flotillas. But as far as light cruisers go, that is the only exception. All other Japanese light cruisers were destroyer leaders. (There were only 2 distinct groups - The 20 or so more or less similar 5500 tonners of WWI era, and the 4 new ships completed in 1942-43) There were no light cruisers-sea plane tenders. The 29 knot 10,000 ton sea plane tenders of IJN were not cruisers. They were strictly sea plane tenders.
Chuck (I do wish you'd log in) the internal fittings and the tactical employment of the ships are what we are referring to. One only needs to look at the administrative organization of the fleet in 12/41 to see what we're talking about.

The most important job of 2/3 of the cruisers were to concentrate, coordinate and report scouting data from submarines and seaplanes (based on islands). Remember, in the 1930s secure frequencies had ranges of 100-500 miles. The destroyer leaders were the ones which were scheduled to get a massive torpedo armament on the outbreak of war.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
kennylibben
Posts: 1065
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:25 am
Location: I live in Off-Topic...
Contact:

Post by kennylibben »

Anonymous wrote:
kennylibben wrote:i'm talking about the gun platform there in front of the bridge...

Image
Which platform? The little catwalk directly in front of the bridge windows, or the platform jutting out in front of the B-turret, over the back of A turret?
The one that B turret is on, with the end of it slanting up over A turret.
It's not who you are, but what you do that defines you.
User avatar
chuck
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: equidistant to everywhere

Post by chuck »

The slanting platform is a blast shield. Notice turret A is open in the back. If the balst shield is not there, then when turret B fires straight ahead, the blast would concuss the crew of the turret A.

Few Japanese ships have this sort of blast shield because Japanese cruisers with open turrets usually don't have superfiring turrets on top of them. But this kind of blast shield is common on British ships.
User avatar
kennylibben
Posts: 1065
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:25 am
Location: I live in Off-Topic...
Contact:

Post by kennylibben »

well then you admit, its an unusual ship for that nature... even if the british had them, they didn't have the rest of the design of japanese ships such as the sweptback funnel...

admit defeat.
It's not who you are, but what you do that defines you.
User avatar
Dustermaker
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:08 am
Location: Nebraska, USA

Post by Dustermaker »

chuck wrote:
Werner wrote:Italian Capitani Romani class.
Image
Nothing too usual about it.
you dont see the lazer cannons? j/k
Post Reply

Return to “History & Technology”