IJN Yahagi 1944

Naval History and the Technology associated with it.

Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes

User avatar
Laurence Batchelor
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:20 am
Location: Warwickshire, England

Post by Laurence Batchelor »

Werner wrote: How would you define Japanese "production" by April, 1945?
This was mid-1944 Werner!

Gentlemen, I can only ask of you to read Hara's recently released book and make up your own mind.
I for one see him strikingly as a very thoughtful and methodical officer and commander.

I very much doubt the IJN would be sending their best cruiser (that was left) i.e. Yahagi on a one-way suicide mission with Kaiten suicide torpedoes.
Remember the fleet was something like 9 destroyers, Yahagi and Yamato and that was all the IJN had left of the 2nd fleet.
Consider their intended mission, to make it to the USN's landings off Okinawa and sink all they could.
This is why I believe it more likely this cruiser would be loaded with anything the IJN could 'pull out of the woodwork' e.g. the laboratory.
It's no coicidence Hara was pulled from the torpedo school to Captain Japan's best cruiser that was left to them.
They hoped their lucky Captain 'who always brought his destroyer home without a scratch' and their best torpedo Captain would work miracles for them once again.
This was desperation in the extreame and why also they gave him all the best tools the IJN had to offer at this time.
Last edited by Laurence Batchelor on Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Post by Werner »

Sorry, when you put Yahagi with Yamato, I thought "final sortie".
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
chuck
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: equidistant to everywhere

Post by chuck »

Laurence Batchelor wrote:
Werner wrote: How would you define Japanese "production" by April, 1945?
This was mid-1944 Werner!

Which was when Kaiten human torpedo became approved.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
User avatar
Laurence Batchelor
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:20 am
Location: Warwickshire, England

Post by Laurence Batchelor »

My mistake sorry correction December 1944 was the month Hara joined Yahagi and it would seem the new weaponry and equipment was fitted Jan/Feb 1945.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Post by Werner »

Laurence Batchelor wrote:My mistake sorry correction December 1944 was the month Hara joined Yahagi and it would seem the new weaponry and equipment was fitted Jan/Feb 1945.
And the Final Sortie was after 1 April 45 while the invasion of Okinawa was underway.

I'm sure that the fact that Okinawa was technically part of the Tokyo Prefecture was a great morale reason for this one-way trip.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
Laurence Batchelor
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:20 am
Location: Warwickshire, England

Post by Laurence Batchelor »

I went through this USN report on Japanese weapons systems (I've been through this before, but as its so long I've never been through it all), thanks for reminding me of it!
Click section 0-01-1 and yes authors/researchers seem not to have been looking at these documents properly!:
"Homing Torpedoes": In an effort to develop a "homing" torpedo, the Japanese undertook experiments with hydrophone-equipped torpedoes designed to home on a sound source. Two principles were employed, one depending on the difference in sound intensity at two points, the other on phase difference. Only electric torpedoes (Type 92) were used for experiments.

The research met with only limited success, and the experiments were finally abandoned. p3
The date is not given when their development were abandoned, but at least this is supportive evidence they existed and the Japanese were developing them themselves.
Remember this report was compiled by an Allied technical mission to Japan mostly from whatever documentation survived and by talking to co-operative Japanese personnel.
They (the Allies) may not have been told the full story and what Hara is telling us is some actually were 'gambled' and fitted to the last remaining front line cruiser left the 2nd Fleet.

I've also just found something on page 31 which states Germany delivered 10 of their electric torpedoes to the Japanese in 1942.
Right thats it this thing is getting printed! :big_grin:
Last edited by Laurence Batchelor on Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Post by Werner »

I posted the German delivery above; It was reported in navweps.com....

I do not believe they were homing torpedoes, simply electric torpedoes.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
Laurence Batchelor
Posts: 1376
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:20 am
Location: Warwickshire, England

Post by Laurence Batchelor »

I must have missed your earlier post.
I never said they were, I was making two seperate points about two different types of torpedo development they seemed to be doing.

This same report suggest further down the IJN had a fully working electric 21" torpedo by 1934 they had developed themselves. (p76)

Furthermore after going through page after page the Homing torpedoes are detailed on page290-298:
The experiments appear to have been confined to electrically driven torpedoes, and no information is forthcoming whether any operational success was acheived.
One type of these IJN homing torpedoes were modified Type 92 electric models.
Last edited by Laurence Batchelor on Sat Jul 28, 2007 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Post by Werner »

I think if you look closely at the info, the "differential passive" system was probably indigenous. I believe the German homing system relied on doppler effect steering, which would mean "differential passive" was a Japanese development, and one a naturalist (like myself) would think of. The "right" and "left" ears of the torpedo would listen for the sound and when the amplitude was precisely equal, you were properly aimed. Of course, the torpedo would take a curved course to the target, the arc size dependent on target speed. The Japanese were well-suited with the fastest torpedoes and the longest range, so they could discount the cosine costs of this kind of guidance.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
Post Reply

Return to “History & Technology”