The strange, sad story of Surcouf

Naval History and the Technology associated with it.

Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes

Post Reply
User avatar
Avery Boyer
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Berks County, Pennsylvania
Contact:

The strange, sad story of Surcouf

Post by Avery Boyer »

Tracy White post a link to a Wikipedia article about the submarine Surcouf. I was facinated by the whole story, the sinking of american tankers while Surcouf was on patrol, and her eventual demise at the hands of an american merchant ship or submarines. What is everyone's opinion on this story? I believe she was sunk by accident, by what ever means.

Here's a link to the story:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_submarine_Surcouf
"It is best to remain silent and let others assume you are dumb than to speak up and remove all doubt"

http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
Guest

Post by Guest »

Soucouf looks like something that could only come out of a James Bond movie.
Tiornu
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 11:53 pm

Re: The strange, sad story of Surcouf

Post by Tiornu »

The collision between Surcouf and Thompson Lykes is very well documented. I'm not sure where there's room for mystery. This is one of those cases where the truth is simply too boring for some folks.
User avatar
Jefgte
Posts: 542
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:53 am
Location: France

Post by Jefgte »

Avery wrote:

"...Surcouf was on patrol"


As I know, she was not on patrol but en route for the Pacific (via Panama) to operate with USN.



Jef :thumbs_up_1:
Current 1/700 WL
HMS Repulse
User avatar
Deckard
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Adelaide,Sth Australia

Post by Deckard »

Remember that Heller Surcouf kit that went on ebay for over 1000 pounds sterling a while back? I think it's an interesting sub and it's probably a nice kit with good box art, but my LHS has one or two on the shelf for around $40 (re-issues, but exactly the same).

I can't but help think that that person is still in the throws of buyer's remorse.
User avatar
Jean-Paul Binot
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Upcountry Thailand

Re: The strange, sad story of Surcouf

Post by Jean-Paul Binot »

Tiornu wrote:The collision between Surcouf and Thompson Lykes is very well documented. I'm not sure where there's room for mystery. This is one of those cases where the truth is simply too boring for some folks.
Actually, there is definitely room for controversy. True, Thompson Lykes collided with something, but the damage to her bow was very light, and quite unlikely to have been the consequence of ramming a ship as large as Surcouf, nearly as large as the cargo herself. Both ships' bridges were at the same level, while the "thing" rammed by Thompson Lykes was very low on the water and the collision did not even slow her down much. By comparison, damage done to the bow of a RN destroyer or corvette ramming a U-Boot was often quite spectacular.

A much more likely explanation for the loss of Surcouf is "friendly fire", i.e. the attack by US planes. Three more French submarines were sunk in the same way during the war, and at least one US sub too (USS Dorado SS-248).

If true, it is very sad for this unique ship and her gallant crew to have been lost to trigger happy American aircrews�
Jean-Paul Binot
User avatar
Walt
Posts: 250
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:02 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: The strange, sad story of Surcouf

Post by Walt »

Jean-Paul Binot wrote:
Tiornu wrote:The collision between Surcouf and Thompson Lykes is very well documented. I'm not sure where there's room for mystery. This is one of those cases where the truth is simply too boring for some folks.
Actually, there is definitely room for controversy. True, Thompson Lykes collided with something, but the damage to her bow was very light, and quite unlikely to have been the consequence of ramming a ship as large as Surcouf, nearly as large as the cargo herself. Both ships' bridges were at the same level, while the "thing" rammed by Thompson Lykes was very low on the water and the collision did not even slow her down much. By comparison, damage done to the bow of a RN destroyer or corvette ramming a U-Boot was often quite spectacular.

A much more likely explanation for the loss of Surcouf is "friendly fire", i.e. the attack by US planes. Three more French submarines were sunk in the same way during the war, and at least one US sub too (USS Dorado SS-248).

If true, it is very sad for this unique ship and her gallant crew to have been lost to trigger happy American aircrews�
Actually that is quite correct the incident between Thompson and Sucouf is well documented..But in hindsight it may have been another vessel involved..however highly doubtful. As for "trigger happy American aircrews".. umm... Maybe we should not judge them so harshly eh??? Otherwise your post may have been in German :big_grin: .
BTW And any vessel in the high security areas like Panama not using a IFF transponder by 1942 especially a submarine of unfamilar design or operating in an area that no "friendlys" were supposed to be in were usually targets. She did look very similar to a German "Milk Cow"...
Many rumors about her demise but The ramming is still the most crediable.
.
"When you shoot at a Destroyer and miss. It's like hit'in a wildcat in the A-- with a banjo" !
Lt. Joe Willingham Skipper USS Tautog SS-199

Life is Good/ DBF
Walt
User avatar
Avery Boyer
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Berks County, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by Avery Boyer »

Jefgte wrote:Avery wrote:

"...Surcouf was on patrol"


As I know, she was not on patrol but en route for the Pacific (via Panama) to operate with USN.



Jef :thumbs_up_1:
Yes, Jef, you caught me :thumbs_up_1: She was indeed on her way to the Pacific via Panama when she dissapeared..
"It is best to remain silent and let others assume you are dumb than to speak up and remove all doubt"

http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
Post Reply

Return to “History & Technology”