- Dec 12 1937
US gunboat Panay is sunk by the Japanese military on the Yangtze River by a combined action of bombing, dive bombing, and strafing. Japan apologized, disciplining those involved and paying $2.2M reparations.
70 years ago today
Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes
- Werner
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: (42.24,-87.81)
70 years ago today
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-
Guest
Although it involved the largest scale of assault and highest casualties, it was only one of a long series of violent actions taken by Japan against citizens of western powers with colonial interests in Asia. British and Dutch citizens in Japan, including members of consulate staff, were publicly assaulted by the Japanese police. British, Dutch and French sailors were roughed up by Japanese sailors in Asian ports. At the time it was considered patriotic by the extreme right wing of the Japanese society to show exaggerated thuggish to western individuals they encounter, in a manner similar to how skinheads and neo-NAZIs would conduct themselves today.
The British response to this was rather laughable. They stopped naval port visits with Japan in the late 1930s, thus depriving themselves of the main source of intelligence about Japanese naval capability and equipment.
The British response to this was rather laughable. They stopped naval port visits with Japan in the late 1930s, thus depriving themselves of the main source of intelligence about Japanese naval capability and equipment.
-
RNfanDan
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:17 pm
- Location: EN83
Perhaps this was Japan's covert agenda?Anonymous wrote:The British response to this was rather laughable. They stopped naval port visits with Japan in the late 1930s, thus depriving themselves of the main source of intelligence about Japanese naval capability and equipment.
-
Guest
I doubt it. They can accomplish the same thing by simply denying the right to visit without the unseemly behavior. The thuggish behavior was very much in keeping with the crassly nationalistic mood of the extreme right wing in Japan. They don't mince words about it. Their slogan was something like "If your possess proper awareness of the superiority of the Japanese, then you can not fail to be rude to foreigners."
-
Gone Asiatic
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 pm
- Location: Zipangu - Jipukuo
Curious...what are your sources for this? British tars being roughed up by Japanese in what Asian port? Why didn`t you include American sailors with French, British and Netherlanders? Kemp Tolley`s book Yangzte Patrol makes no mention of brawls between Japanese and foreign sailors in the years leading to WWII; he was a direct participant in that era of history.Anonymous wrote: British, Dutch and French sailors were roughed up by Japanese sailors in Asian ports. At the time it was considered patriotic by the extreme right wing of the Japanese society to show exaggerated thuggish to western individuals they encounter, in a manner similar to how skinheads and neo-NAZIs would conduct themselves today.
No Quarter Asked - None Given


-
Guest
- Filipe Ramires
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:56 pm
- Location: Lisbon, Portugal
-
Guest
Anonymous wrote:First, apologized for being OT, I agree this was tragic to the sailors onboard the Panay, but in that December 1937, Japanese had done far worse thing on shore, in the city of Naking, from 13 December 1937 they massacre 200,000 - 300,000 people in 3 weeks of atrocity.![]()
![]()
Japanese treatment of civilians and combatants of the countries that they are actually at war with is of an entirely different order of barbarity all together. Here we are mentioning only their treatment of nationals of countries which the Japan was ostensibly at peace with.
-
Guest
-
Gone Asiatic
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 7:44 pm
- Location: Zipangu - Jipukuo
Sources
Some quotes from this source would be most welcome.Anonymous wrote:Curious...what are your sources for this? British tars being roughed up by Japanese in what Asian port?
Royal Navy Strategy in the Far East 1919-1939: Preparing for War against Japan (Cass Series: Naval Policy & History) by Andrew Field. I believe the port was Shanghai.
No Quarter Asked - None Given


- Dustermaker
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:08 am
- Location: Nebraska, USA
cuz us "cowboys" would have rocked their world.....j/kGone Asiatic wrote:Curious...what are your sources for this? British tars being roughed up by Japanese in what Asian port? Why didn`t you include American sailors with French, British and Netherlanders? Kemp Tolley`s book Yangzte Patrol makes no mention of brawls between Japanese and foreign sailors in the years leading to WWII; he was a direct participant in that era of history.Anonymous wrote: British, Dutch and French sailors were roughed up by Japanese sailors in Asian ports. At the time it was considered patriotic by the extreme right wing of the Japanese society to show exaggerated thuggish to western individuals they encounter, in a manner similar to how skinheads and neo-NAZIs would conduct themselves today.
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. How do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin. - Ronald Reagan
