Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes
- Avery Boyer
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm
- Location: Berks County, Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
I have been informed that effort to save the Spruance class destroyer USS Conolly has failed and she will likely be sunk or scrapped. This is and was the only effort to save a Spruance class destroyer. Only seven members of the class are currently left afloat, Paul F Foster, Arthur W Radford, David R Ray, Conolly, Cushing, O'Bannon and Fletcher. Fair winds and following seas old girl.
"It is best to remain silent and let others assume you are dumb than to speak up and remove all doubt"
http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
-
colin
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
Why does a Spru-can need to be saved?
- Avery Boyer
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm
- Location: Berks County, Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
They were, up until the Arleigh Burkes the largest class of destroyer built post-war and were the backbone of the US destroyer fleet in the latter days of the cold-war. And because one day someone will wish that they could have walked the decks of one of these ships, same way many wish they could have walked the decks of Hood or Arizona.
"It is best to remain silent and let others assume you are dumb than to speak up and remove all doubt"
http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
- chuck
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
- Location: equidistant to everywhere
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
Someone will wish to walk the deck of every ship that has ever been built.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
- reigels
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
Sorry to say but I have to agree on this one. It's too easy to make the jump from having a warship collection on the shelf at home to wanting a full scale collection available to visit as well.
I'm sure there are great memories on board for those who served, but by the same token we cannot save old high schools, drive-in theaters and sports areas for posterity either. The economics just don't work.
I'm sure there are great memories on board for those who served, but by the same token we cannot save old high schools, drive-in theaters and sports areas for posterity either. The economics just don't work.
-- Scott
- Avery Boyer
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:56 pm
- Location: Berks County, Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
::sigh::
Have it your way. Chuck has a point, but the Spruance class are historically significant. There are reasons why the Navy has such a unforgiving system for warship preservation, you have already pointed out one: it is not economically feasible to preserve a member of every class of warship. But, it is a loss nonetheless.
Please don't reply as I started this topic for informational purposes, not to debate the ethics and economics of warship preservation.
I don't think I'll even bother anymore, just because we build models doesn't mean we have any affection for our subjects. This is the third time I've had people look negatively on an effort to save a warship and I'm pretty damn tired of it, so I'll just stop.
Have it your way. Chuck has a point, but the Spruance class are historically significant. There are reasons why the Navy has such a unforgiving system for warship preservation, you have already pointed out one: it is not economically feasible to preserve a member of every class of warship. But, it is a loss nonetheless.
Please don't reply as I started this topic for informational purposes, not to debate the ethics and economics of warship preservation.
I don't think I'll even bother anymore, just because we build models doesn't mean we have any affection for our subjects. This is the third time I've had people look negatively on an effort to save a warship and I'm pretty damn tired of it, so I'll just stop.
"It is best to remain silent and let others assume you are dumb than to speak up and remove all doubt"
http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
http://nssavannah.wordpress.com/
- Werner
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: (42.24,-87.81)
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
There are a few like Fletcher which might return to become a museum after foreign service, and there are their cousins the Ticonderogas which can give some idea of what a Spruance was like.
Remember, several WW.II ships on display in the USA spent decades under foreign flags.
I'm sad that none of the big missile frigates were preserved. My choice would have been Mahan or Halsey.
Remember, several WW.II ships on display in the USA spent decades under foreign flags.
I'm sad that none of the big missile frigates were preserved. My choice would have been Mahan or Halsey.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
- lmo1960
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:02 pm
- Location: Quincy, Massachusetts
- Contact:
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
I'd like to see something of the nuclear navy saved, other than the Nautilus.
There are SSNs and SSBNs in Bremerton that could have their reactors removed without destroying the entire sub. They could then be re-floated to be used as museums. Only the US Navy could afford to do this work, and they would also have to get exemptions to some Soviet-era treaties. Considering most former USSR nuc subs ares rotting away at docks, or sunken at sea, I don't see why the Navy can't preserve 1 each of an attack sub and a boomer.
There are SSNs and SSBNs in Bremerton that could have their reactors removed without destroying the entire sub. They could then be re-floated to be used as museums. Only the US Navy could afford to do this work, and they would also have to get exemptions to some Soviet-era treaties. Considering most former USSR nuc subs ares rotting away at docks, or sunken at sea, I don't see why the Navy can't preserve 1 each of an attack sub and a boomer.
Larry Ouellette
Volunteer, USS Salem (CA 139)
United States Naval Shipbuilding Museum
Quincy, Massachusetts, USA
http://www.uss-salem.org/
Volunteer, USS Salem (CA 139)
United States Naval Shipbuilding Museum
Quincy, Massachusetts, USA
http://www.uss-salem.org/
- reigels
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
Re: Effort to save Spruance class destroyer Conolly fails
Or if nothing less I wish notable ships could be adequately documented before they were broken up. If we're going to lose them to history I wish someone would photograph the heck out of them before they head to breakers.
-- Scott