Japanese Surrender on Missouri
Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes
- drdoom1337
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Japanese Surrender on Missouri
We all know that the Japanese surrendered aboard the Missouri, but for years now I've been hearing that the ceremonies should have taken place on South Dakota or New Jersey. Being from NJ, I'd feel kind of upset if this is true. Can anyone reinforce this info?

- Werner
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: (42.24,-87.81)
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
Missouri is named for President Truman's home state. I wouldn't put it beyond reason she was chosen because of that. While Truman was busy stripping the active Navy after WWII, down to a couple carriers, he still refused to allow Missouri to decommission.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
- chuck
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
- Location: equidistant to everywhere
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
That was the reason. By right the ceremony should have been aboard the New Jersey, which was fleet flagship at the time. The flag transfer from New Jersey to Missouri was done at the behest of Truman.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
- drdoom1337
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
That's really kind of upsetting, especially with NJ being fleet flagship. So do you think if Roosevelt was still alive it would have been NJ? or would it have been NY ?

- Werner
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: (42.24,-87.81)
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
I think if Roosevelt was alive it would have been something meaningful like Nevada.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
- chuck
- Posts: 3384
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
- Location: equidistant to everywhere
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
Have charity. Missouri has so little.drdoom1337 wrote:That's really kind of upsetting, especially with NJ being fleet flagship.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
-
JoeA
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:28 am
- Location: Geneva
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
chuck wrote:Have charity. Missouri has so little.drdoom1337 wrote:That's really kind of upsetting, especially with NJ being fleet flagship.
Ok that made me chuckle.
- drdoom1337
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri
Well I guess at least the NJ is in Camden rather than Pearl, so it's easier for me to see cause of a series of unfortuante events.
