Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Naval History and the Technology associated with it.

Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes

Post Reply
User avatar
drdoom1337
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by drdoom1337 »

We all know that the Japanese surrendered aboard the Missouri, but for years now I've been hearing that the ceremonies should have taken place on South Dakota or New Jersey. Being from NJ, I'd feel kind of upset if this is true. Can anyone reinforce this info?
Image
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by Werner »

Missouri is named for President Truman's home state. I wouldn't put it beyond reason she was chosen because of that. While Truman was busy stripping the active Navy after WWII, down to a couple carriers, he still refused to allow Missouri to decommission.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
chuck
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: equidistant to everywhere

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by chuck »

That was the reason. By right the ceremony should have been aboard the New Jersey, which was fleet flagship at the time. The flag transfer from New Jersey to Missouri was done at the behest of Truman.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
User avatar
drdoom1337
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by drdoom1337 »

That's really kind of upsetting, especially with NJ being fleet flagship. So do you think if Roosevelt was still alive it would have been NJ? or would it have been NY ?
Image
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by Werner »

I think if Roosevelt was alive it would have been something meaningful like Nevada.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
chuck
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: equidistant to everywhere

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by chuck »

drdoom1337 wrote:That's really kind of upsetting, especially with NJ being fleet flagship.
Have charity. Missouri has so little.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
JoeA
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:28 am
Location: Geneva

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by JoeA »

chuck wrote:
drdoom1337 wrote:That's really kind of upsetting, especially with NJ being fleet flagship.
Have charity. Missouri has so little.

Ok that made me chuckle. :heh:
User avatar
drdoom1337
Posts: 1161
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Japanese Surrender on Missouri

Post by drdoom1337 »

Well I guess at least the NJ is in Camden rather than Pearl, so it's easier for me to see cause of a series of unfortuante events.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “History & Technology”