Age of the battleship really ended when?

Naval History and the Technology associated with it.

Moderators: Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes

Post Reply
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Werner »

As usual when Chuck and/or I are involved.

Fortunately this is not a 100-level lecture class on the topic of the battleship, so we can wander a little.

It is time to "bring it home" to battleships, though.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
bengtsson
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: northern Minnesota

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by bengtsson »

I think so Werner. I stray myself, we all do from time to time :smallsmile: . I just like to check in to the BB debate from time to time, too far O.T. and I tend to not bother to check it. Global Geo-Politics are part of any naval board, but maybe not as it concerns the BBs.

Bob B.
Ultimo Tiger

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Ultimo Tiger »

Well we could always talk about if the USS Iowa would be good use against Chinese naval forces couldn't we?
User avatar
chuck
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: equidistant to everywhere

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by chuck »

Lesforan wrote:
Of course, there is always that new battleship the Chinese built! :big_grin:

Relevancy established. :big_grin:
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Werner »

chuck wrote:
Lesforan wrote:
Of course, there is always that new battleship the Chinese built! :big_grin:

Relevancy established. :big_grin:
True; last battleship built I think. The Monitor is only a half, right?
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
Ultimo Tiger

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Ultimo Tiger »

Tell me of this "Chinese Battleship". Enlighten my already enlightended, warmongeristic mind of its existance.
User avatar
chuck
Posts: 3384
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: equidistant to everywhere

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by chuck »

I believe what is being referred to is a tourist trap in China that consist of a floating full sized mock up of a late 19th century Chinese ironclad battleship. Judging from photos it actually looks very realistic on the outside. But it is put together like a card board model, except with sheet metal instead of cardboard.
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Werner »

They have a beautiful website on the ship.

This isn't the website, but you get the idea: http://www.hksw.org/Ting%20Yuen.htm
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
bengtsson
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: northern Minnesota

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by bengtsson »

Werner wrote:They have a beautiful website on the ship.

This isn't the website, but you get the idea: http://www.hksw.org/Ting%20Yuen.htm
They sure put some fine effort into it, that's a fine likeness. The rivets and all. Is that what they are spending their trillion + dollar holdings on? Looks like a nice museum exibit.

Bob B.
User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
Location: (42.24,-87.81)

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Werner »

One could only wish Americans and British had a similar respect for their history. At this point, even a copy of Warspite in 1916 rig, or better maintenance of the existing American museum ships would be gratefully received by this moderator.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.

-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
User avatar
Dave Wooley
Posts: 4131
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:18 am
Location: Liverpool

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Dave Wooley »

Werner wrote:One could only wish Americans and British had a similar respect for their history. At this point, even a copy of Warspite in 1916 rig, or better maintenance of the existing American museum ships would be gratefully received by this moderator.
What really saddens me is the fact that British warships dominated the seas for over 100years. Yet we have nearly nothing to show for all that effort. Ask any one in the UK of school age to name one Victorian battleship or even a pre- dreadnought, let alone any other type of warship and you will be hard pressed to receive an answer. perhaps that may answer the question. :pout:
Dave Wooley
Ultimo Tiger

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Ultimo Tiger »

I was surprised that apparently Warspite is the greatest ship of the RN yet until I got this naval warfare fetish last year, I had never heard of her. A traversty if there ever was one.
User avatar
JWintjes
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:41 am
Location: turning into a power-hungry Yamato-models-munching monster... buahahahaha...

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by JWintjes »

Dave Wooley wrote:
What really saddens me is the fact that British warships dominated the seas for over 100years. Yet we have nearly nothing to show for all that effort. Ask any one in the UK of school age to name one Victorian battleship or even a pre- dreadnought, let alone any other type of warship and you will be hard pressed to receive an answer. perhaps that may answer the question. :pout:
Dave Wooley
Slightly on a tangent, one can only hope that they don't fudge up the effort to restore HMS Caroline to her former glory. I fear though that the powers that be try to turn her into razor blades...

Jorit
Image
User avatar
bengtsson
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: northern Minnesota

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by bengtsson »

The US could have saved Enterprise and the UK could have save Warspite. They were laid up and went for razor blades. How short sighted. Even Japan saved Mikasa and Russia Aurora. Even though they were devistated by war. The US/UK won the war and never bothed to honor their navies with major museum ships. SICK.

Bob B.
Ultimo Tiger

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Ultimo Tiger »

Well within the last year or so I saw a piece on the news about people building steam engines from scratch. Actual, full scale ones that would have been used in the past. They used modern materials and such but the stuff looked really good. You wouldn't think it was a glorified model kit.

Now if only we good folks here at Modelwarships could band together and do the same for these battleships. Warspite IIRC wasn't a particulary huge battleships as opposed to say Hood, Repulse, Vanguard or others. Although the costs involved would be huge (not to mention the logistical effort) to have a lifelike copy of Warspite would be a feat unheard of.
bengtsson wrote:The US/UK won the war and never bothed to honor their navies with major museum ships. SICK.
To be fair we did preserve HMS Belfast which had a distinguished career in the RN from WWII to Korea. The US preserved all four Iowa class ships, two ships of the South Dakota, North Carolina, Texas (the oldest Dreadnought in existance), several Essex class CV's as well as numerous other ships. So what you said isn't really true at all.
Roman1

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Roman1 »

Ultimo Tiger wrote:Although the costs involved would be huge (not to mention the logistical effort) to have a lifelike copy of Warspite would be a feat unheard of.
Actually, technologically it would be an easy project if you would build just a shell, without any inner machinery. Somebody here on the forum could probably give you a cost estimate for something like this (cost of just a hull of comparable size). But what would be the point of having maquete like this?
User avatar
bengtsson
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: northern Minnesota

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by bengtsson »

Ultimo Tiger wrote:
bengtsson wrote:The US/UK won the war and never bothed to honor their navies with major museum ships. SICK.
To be fair we did preserve HMS Belfast which had a distinguished career in the RN from WWII to Korea. The US preserved all four Iowa class ships, two ships of the South Dakota, North Carolina, Texas (the oldest Dreadnought in existance), several Essex class CV's as well as numerous other ships. So what you said isn't really true at all.
All true. I was just refering to the major capital ships with their splendid combat records fom the start to finish of the war. I just have a thing about Enterprise and Warspite not being saved. Really no excuse for such famous ships being used to shave ourselves with in the mornings :big_grin: I am aware of the many other ships that were saved for museum ships. My favorite being Belfast. I simply think if Japan could save Mikasa, the excuse for why Warspite went to the breakers is a non starter.
Bob B.
Last edited by bengtsson on Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ultimo Tiger

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Ultimo Tiger »

Well we can't have the real thing so we could just settle for the next best thing. A giant metal model kit with photetch that doesn't require surgical goggles to see :big_grin:
User avatar
Lesforan
Posts: 559
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:22 pm
Location: Ogallala, Nebraska, USA

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Lesforan »

I think that was the thinking behind China's new battlewagon. You have to give them credit for that.

Of course, they should have a couple of VTE powerplants inside if they want to do it right.

We do need to recognize we have saved many representative ships: as was stated, the Essex-class CV's make very impressive displays. I have visited Yorktown many times and even had lunch on her once. How many others? Intrepid is at New York, Hornet at Alameda (I think). Maybe a couple more.

Besides all the Iowas, we have also saved Mass., NC, AL, and Texas. Plus a heavy cruiser at Philadelphia (Salem?) and the protected cruiser Olympia and frigate Constitution (a cruiser of its day).

Destroyers, too: Joseph Kennedy at Fall River, MA and Laffey at Charleston SC. Maybe more elsewhere. Lots of subs including the nuke Nautilus at New London, and many Gato and Balao types in various states.

Coast Guard cutter Ingham at Charleston, and Confederate sub Hunley at a separate location in Charleston.

Two prizes that got away: USS Oregon and USS Enterprise.

So we really did save more than probably any other nation.
Les Foran
On the Oregon Trail
User avatar
Dave Wooley
Posts: 4131
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:18 am
Location: Liverpool

Re: Age of the battleship really ended when?

Post by Dave Wooley »

Lesforan wrote:I think that was the thinking behind China's new battlewagon. You have to give them credit for that.

Of course, they should have a couple of VTE powerplants inside if they want to do it right.

We do need to recognize we have saved many representative ships: as was stated, the Essex-class CV's make very impressive displays. I have visited Yorktown many times and even had lunch on her once. How many others? Intrepid is at New York, Hornet at Alameda (I think). Maybe a couple more.

Besides all the Iowas, we have also saved Mass., NC, AL, and Texas. Plus a heavy cruiser at Philadelphia (Salem?) and the protected cruiser Olympia and frigate Constitution (a cruiser of its day).

Destroyers, too: Joseph Kennedy at Fall River, MA and Laffey at Charleston SC. Maybe more elsewhere. Lots of subs including the nuke Nautilus at New London, and many Gato and Balao types in various states.

Coast Guard cutter Ingham at Charleston, and Confederate sub Hunley at a separate location in Charleston.

Two prizes that got away: USS Oregon and USS Enterprise.

So we really did save more than probably any other nation.
If only we the British had the same will to preserve a bit of our naval History . When the old Caroline comes up for disposal I trust and hope that we preserve that ship. it would be a travesty if it were to go .
Dave Wooley
Post Reply

Return to “History & Technology”