but each detail you add in your model your "long road" decrease.....
the time for me is very few. just weekends and as i am married.....
do you know......
p.s. il ike your tool to make small circles - wonderful
Moderators: MartinJQuinn, JIM BAUMANN, HMAS, Tiny69, Dave Wooley
Hi 109 Thanks for your comments and I'm pleased that you got your material from Albion Alloy's109 wrote:Hi Dave,
great work on the foam monitors!![]()
Bye!
PS: I got my first Albion Alloy materials. Great stuff from across the channel!)
Hi DrPR Thank you for your comments they are much appreciated . I've only just returned from the Telford IPMS and to see the intensity , if that's the right word in the detail on 1:700 models I am in awe at the capabilities of the modellers that create such a level of realism , we never stop learning!. In fact I had a discussion with Guido over coffee on this very subject of scale and what it means . It is certainly a vast subject when you get into any discussion .A weekend is not long enough and I even managed to get some photos as well.DrPR wrote:Dave,
The details are where large scale scratchbuilding differs the most from kit building. It is up to the scratchbuilder (and kitbasher) to discover the missing details, and then figure out how to model them. It is not all laid out before you when you start, and discovering the details is the most challenging part.
When I started my 1:96 USS Oklahoma City CLG-5 I had drawings of the hull, deck layouts, and superstructure, plus a fiberglass hull. That was easy. However, I couldn't find drawings for many details, such as the flag staff on the stern (it took five years to find enough good photos, including 8mm home movies, that showed how it was constructed). I soon reached a point where I couldn't continue until a lot of questions were answered. Many other significant details also took years to figure out how they were built and then create my own scale drawings.
For me figuring out the details is a big part of scratch building. When I visit the USS Little Rock CLG-4 (sister ship to the OK City) and walk up to a boat winch, it is like visiting an old friend. I know that winch inside and out. Ditto for the missile launcher or the 6" turret. My 1:96 models of these features will represent them as accurately as I can make them.
I really appreciate your attention to details, and I understand your frustrations. However, your work speaks for itself! Your Kiev is beautiful. And I have to repeat what others here have said - it is hard to believe it is "only" 1:144 scale. From the photos I would have guessed 1:72!
Hi Russ Yes you are so right as we both follow a similar path .That first one is the mind teaser, after that it is more of a production line. Looking at it logically and from a very practical view point I should do one and cast the rest, but in a strange way I enjoy just making the parts, each and every one.russclark wrote:lovely work on the firefighting foam nozzels,it is nice to see the method you use to build these small parts.the first one is usually the hardest,then it is repition for the rest![]()











Hi Ron Good to hear form you . Quite a number at Telford where asking after you .ARH wrote:Very nice Dave,![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Hi Bill good to hear from you . Seeing your carriers with crew convinced me that is the way to go and I thank you for that .Bill Waldorf wrote:Amazing as usual....Glad you went with figures. I have no words. Only praise......![]()
![]()
![]()
Hi Russ Yes some of the "old" tools are the most versatile and thanks for looking in and your kind comments, press on with your Nagato !!!!!!russclark wrote:dave, the manual sights are supberb,the good old punch comes in handy againkeep up the exellent work sir.you inspire me, and more than likly many others to strive to do better
Hi Gtbred I'd love to do a supercarrier but first I'd have to cut a "big" hole in my workshop opps shed!!!gtbred wrote:Man, i can only think if you did a Supercarrier.![]()
![]()
![]()