What-If IJN battleship Ise (伊勢)

A place for "Never Weres" and "Might Have Beens"

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
able
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:59 am
Location: Shanghai?China

What-If IJN battleship Ise (伊勢)

Post by able »

Battlecarrier
???? 290_23956_0adbaceb38f7c6a.jpg
???? 290_23956_1ff0e12e615bf94.jpg
???? 290_23956_9a75645fe00cd94.jpg
???? 290_23956_75513aad4e4775b.jpg
warspite63
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:46 pm

Re: What if IJN Ise

Post by warspite63 »

Crazy enough to be real! :-)

Again, fantastic attention to detail.
User avatar
D-Boy
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 1:57 pm
Location: Schodack Landing, NY

Re: What if IJN Ise

Post by D-Boy »

Able, can you comment on the build process for the Ise? I love all three builds, but this one grabs my attention and won't let go.
gnorfen
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:05 am

Re: What if IJN Ise

Post by gnorfen »

Crazy but inspiring, I would not have liked to served on it, capsizes as soon as launched :thumbs_up_1:

It looks like a deck from Ryujo, hullmix from threedeck Akagi and Ise?

I must say that this build gives ideas how to have fun with some of my older not completed IJN kits, some absurd Yamato ships or modified Nagatos or other ships from the Hiraga archives that gives lots of artistic freedom.
User avatar
PetrolGator
Posts: 2353
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:02 pm
Location: Herndon, VA

Re: What if IJN Ise

Post by PetrolGator »

Love it, in spite of how utterly top heavy such a boat would be. The IJN may have just been crazy enough to try!
- Chris

1/700 Saratoga w/Pontos (Needs paint)
1/700 Potato w/Kurama (On hold)
1/700 Murdertorpedoboat Ooi
User avatar
GMG4RWF
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:01 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: What if IJN Ise

Post by GMG4RWF »

PetrolGator wrote:Love it, in spite of how utterly top heavy such a boat would be.
A lot of the IJN ships were top heavy ("cram in whatever you can & worry about keeping it afloat latter"), this and a disdain for anything "defensive" (ie: armor/damage control/repair) contributed heavily to the IJN losses to (in many cases) crippling but not lethal damage. The Ryujo for one (originally designed for a single hanger with around 15 aircraft, flight deck was raised to add a 2nd hanger to double air-arm, created excess top weight issues). Even their "special" type (Fubuki class) DDs were notoriously top heavy, especially the type IIs (Ayanami) which replaced the original 12.7cm/50 low angle "Type A" turrets with larger & heavier high angle "Type B" turrets, the reason the "Type 3"s (Akatsuki) were so much larger & more expensive. However, if this ship were built the same as other IJN carriers, with metal framed wood flight deck & large open hanger, then this ship wouldn�t be as top heavy as it looks. The hanger/deck structure wouldn�t be that much heavier than the 4 original armored turrets with their heavy guns. The main structural issue I see is the weight of the heavy pagoda offset to one side. This can be countered by internal ballast but that would add a lot of dead weight. The ship would be highly ineffective as a combat unit, getting into a gun battle would expose the unprotected aircraft facilities (& bombs/fuel) to enemy fire. The main gun barrels would likewise interfere with flight ops (massive air turbulence down the deck) & the weight/space would be better used for more aircraft/bomb/fuel storage. These are of-course the reason no true hybrids were ever actually built or used. That aside, I love the concept & with modern tech could be viable. Love the build, fantastic job! :thumbs_up_1:
Post Reply

Return to “What-If”