It would sure be nice to get a new Nagara-class, and a new Early-War Kuma-class.
MB
OMG LOOK! A signature
Working on:
1/700 (All Fall 1942):
HIJMS Nagara
HIJMS Aoba & Kinugasa
USS San Francisco
USS Helena
USS St. Louis
USS Laffey & Farenholt
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 4 - 7
HIJMS Sub-Chasers No. 13 - 16
DavidP wrote:America is not a continent but the short form for United States of America. Canada, USA & Mexico are each part of the North American Continent.
drasticplastic wrote:
Only for the better dollar!! The same kit costs around $65 CDN (with the exchange).
Now I got it.. You're Canadian and want to be from United States of America.
Let me be perfectly clear: "Only for the better dollar!!" Sometimes it's a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there! I'm very happy and comfortable where I live. I was referring to the weakness of CDN to US $!
Chargerman wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10157966356344459&set=gm.2817127025045769&type=3&theater&ifg=1 link for Flyhawk add on facebook.
No full hull, like all Jutland warriors so .. sadly, a pass, or a crazy scratch build project because this next to full hull warspite would be cool to have.
A little update on my request about an Agincourt FULL HULL from Flyhawk:
Dear Jim,
Thank you for your mail.
The full hull version should be release in the future.
Please keep focus in our news.
Thank your for your support.
I see your above points guys. However, when I got back into the hobby in 2009, there were many full hull offerings readily available from trumpeter and dragon. So my collection of 50 some odd 1/700 ships are all full hull. I would like to at least have the option for future models to be full hull so they fit in with the rest of my ships. Part of the fun for me is seeing the ships side by side to compare. This must seem alien to the talented diorama builders on this website; I certain admire all the submissions I see with the realistic water and weathering done. For now that is outside my skill set. Someday...
Anyway, I am pleased to hear a full hull option may be available for Agincourt some day. Just my 2 cents worth.
Sulu wrote:I see your above points guys. However, when I got back into the hobby in 2009, there were many full hull offerings readily available from trumpeter and dragon. So my collection of 50 some odd 1/700 ships are all full hull. I would like to at least have the option for future models to be full hull so they fit in with the rest of my ships. Part of the fun for me is seeing the ships side by side to compare. This must seem alien to the talented diorama builders on this website; I certain admire all the submissions I see with the realistic water and weathering done. For now that is outside my skill set. Someday...
Anyway, I am pleased to hear a full hull option may be available for Agincourt some day. Just my 2 cents worth.
I know your point ,but 1/700 WATERLINE came from the seventies so the new full hull offerings are brand new.
I am glad there are full hull options ,it is a choice ,but nevertheless the ORIGINAL current was waterline
No Whine Policy
1.- Modify it
2.- Ignore it
3.- Don't build it
Quaestor, no it's new and never suspected before. I wonder why they have gone head to head with Flyhawk who have a Kelly out already and J's in plan when they could have easily picked the 6x4.7 Ls and Ms. Ah well, any RN destroyer is good..but why not Saumarez to go with their Norfolk at the North Cape.