Calling all Essex-class (Cold War configuration) fans

Carriers of all Nations and eras
CV, CVA, CVE, CVL, CVA, CVS, CVN.

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

Image hope to both Charlies to look like this or close too it.
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

3 coats of dark ghost grey and it shows some mistakes. but can be fix. Oriskany Image Image
modelersc
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:29 pm

What is this structure?

Post by modelersc »

Hi all
I need help on the angled deck Intrepid. Can anyone identify the angled structure under the island below deck level? Is this a vent? Is it completely enclosed or open on top?
Here's a photo that shows it.
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_KZKtgQBJEn0/RxIrg ... ID.%20.jpg

Thanks loads for the help
modelersc
User avatar
maccrage
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:54 pm
Location: Milwaukie, OR

Re: What is this structure?

Post by maccrage »

modelersc wrote:Hi all
I need help on the angled deck Intrepid. Can anyone identify the angled structure under the island below deck level? Is this a vent? Is it completely enclosed or open on top?
Here's a photo that shows it.
http://lh6.ggpht.com/_KZKtgQBJEn0/RxIrg ... ID.%20.jpg

Thanks loads for the help
modelersc
That's the escalator. I believe it was completely enclosed.
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

escalator for the pliots.
User avatar
Dick J
Posts: 1992
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Dick J »

This escalator for the pilots was of great use during the Korean war, which presented the exact conditions that it was designed to address. During cold water ops, the pilots wear a external rubberized suit (usually referred to as a "poopy suit") to increase their survivability in the event of an overwater ejection or ditching. However, if the pilot gets all sweaty under the suit while trying to climb several decks from the ready rooms to the flightdeck (with many pounds of flight gear) on those nearly vertical ladders, it negates the attempt to keep him dry and warm. The escalator was not a pilot "perk", but a legitimate survival issue.
modelersc
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:29 pm

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by modelersc »

That's amazing. I never would have guessed an escalator! And what an interesting reason.
Many thanks for the answers.
modelersc
User avatar
Mark McKinnis
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Mark McKinnis »

The Forrestal's and the Kittyhawk's had them as well. They never worked on the Connie when I was aboard but it was alot easier to walk up the 4 decks to the flight deck on a static escalator rather than walking up 4 decks through hatches and up ladders with all of your flight gear on. The Nimitz Class fixed that with putting all of the ready rooms on the O-3 Level below the flight deck.
User avatar
Dick J
Posts: 1992
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Dick J »

Mark McKinnis wrote:The Nimitz Class fixed that with putting all of the ready rooms on the O-3 Level below the flight deck.
That is interesting considering that the modernized Essex's put the ready rooms below the armored hangardeck because of pilot casualties when they had them in the gallery deck during WW-II. Many died on Franklin (killed by explosions from below) and Bunker Hill (suffocated when trapped during the big fire) because of the ready room location. I guess the increased flightdeck armor on the supercarriers made that less of an issue.
Tracy White
Posts: 10628
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Tracy White »

I think that at the fact that at the time of their design the primary threat was surface hugging cruise missiles and not bombs or falling shells.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

starting to like the Charlies. Image
BCBilly
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 5:56 pm

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by BCBilly »

Tracy White wrote:I think that at the fact that at the time of their design the primary threat was surface hugging cruise missiles and not bombs or falling shells.
I don't think there was any concept of a cruise missile in the early 40s when the Essex class was designed. The Germans were developing the Fritx, but it wasn't known about till 43 or 44 and it was not really a surface hugging design. I think the French Exocet was the first sea level hugging design.
User avatar
Mark McKinnis
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Mark McKinnis »

BCBilly wrote:
Tracy White wrote:I think that at the fact that at the time of their design the primary threat was surface hugging cruise missiles and not bombs or falling shells.
I don't think there was any concept of a cruise missile in the early 40s when the Essex class was designed. The Germans were developing the Fritx, but it wasn't known about till 43 or 44 and it was not really a surface hugging design. I think the French Exocet was the first sea level hugging design.


I think that Tracy is pointing out that at the time Nimitz was designed, cruise missiles were the threat(they still are), not falling bombs. With the cruise missile threat, a ready room on the main deck would be just as vulnerable as a ready room on the O-3 was to bombs.
User avatar
Mark McKinnis
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Mark McKinnis »

Nice looking Essex Red!

It depends on which 27C you are doing though. Remember that Intrepid,Ticonderoga, and Hancock had the starboard elevator behind the aircraft crane and the Lexington, Bon Homme Richard, and Shangri-La had the elevator before the crane like all of the other SCB-125 conversions. Yours appears to be either the Lexington, Bon Homme Richard, or the Shangri-La if you are giving them some A-3D's.

A really good look at how the decks were diferent can be seen on google maps satelite view and comparing the Intrepid in NY, Lexington in Corpus, and the Yortown(Charleston) or Hornet(Alemeda). I took some screen shots some time ago of those museum ships since they offered the best overhead look that you can get of the different varieties of the SCB-125 Essex Class. Too bad I did not do that before they sank the Oriskany though. She was a little different from all of the others.
User avatar
Hippy Ed
Posts: 2013
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:22 pm
Location: Calif
Contact:

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Hippy Ed »

gtbred wrote:starting to like the Charlies. Image

:thumbs_up_1: :thumbs_up_1:
If ya lose yer sense of humor...
You've lost everything...

On the Bench:
1/720 Italeri CVN-68 ca 1976/77
1/800 ARii 1/800 CV-59 backdating to 1961 (CVA-59)
1/700Trumpy USS Hornet CV-8 "Doolittle Raiders"
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

Thanks Ed!
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

Mark McKinnis wrote:Nice looking Essex Red!

It depends on which 27C you are doing though. Remember that Intrepid,Ticonderoga, and Hancock had the starboard elevator behind the aircraft crane and the Lexington, Bon Homme Richard, and Shangri-La had the elevator before the crane like all of the other SCB-125 conversions. Yours appears to be either the Lexington, Bon Homme Richard, or the Shangri-La if you are giving them some A-3D's.

A really good look at how the decks were diferent can be seen on google maps satelite view and comparing the Intrepid in NY, Lexington in Corpus, and the Yortown(Charleston) or Hornet(Alemeda). I took some screen shots some time ago of those museum ships since they offered the best overhead look that you can get of the different varieties of the SCB-125 Essex Class. Too bad I did not do that before they sank the Oriskany though. She was a little different from all of the others.
Thanks Mark! It just shows that you can build a ship made during WWII and have it in Nam. It still amaze me about the Whales on board. I think i have a overhead shot of Hancock and Bo Hom at Alameda somewhere. It shows the different layouts.
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

Ahh, here we go! Image
User avatar
Mark McKinnis
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral Florida

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by Mark McKinnis »

That is a really cool photo!!! :thumbs_up_1:
User avatar
gtbred
Posts: 2717
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:10 am
Location: san francisco

Re: Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans!

Post by gtbred »

Image 2 1/350 Charlies.
Post Reply

Return to “Aircraft Carriers”