Calling all Essex-class (Cold War configuration) fans
Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey
- Werner
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: (42.24,-87.81)
Calling all Essex-class (Cold War configuration) fans
Tracy:
I've been wondering why there is so much variability in the starboard side of the SCB-125 ships. For example, the location of the elevator and the ramps to it on CV11 is so much further aft as opposed to CV16. Is this an SCB27C artifact which was not passed on to the ships that went straight from mothballs to SCB125 (like Lexington)?
Moderator (Timmy C) note: This thread was split from the previous "Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans" thread on June 7, 2012. As such some things in here may seem incongruous or contain odd references. If you are looking for things pertaining to the Essexes during the grey period of post-Sept. 1945 through to the Korean War, it may be worth your while to check both this thread and the other Calling all WWII Essex-class Carrier Fans thread. For example, some Korean War photos used for demonstrating the hull shape can be found at the bottom of this page: viewtopic.php?f=46&t=4802&start=480
I've been wondering why there is so much variability in the starboard side of the SCB-125 ships. For example, the location of the elevator and the ramps to it on CV11 is so much further aft as opposed to CV16. Is this an SCB27C artifact which was not passed on to the ships that went straight from mothballs to SCB125 (like Lexington)?
Moderator (Timmy C) note: This thread was split from the previous "Calling all Essex Class Carrier Fans" thread on June 7, 2012. As such some things in here may seem incongruous or contain odd references. If you are looking for things pertaining to the Essexes during the grey period of post-Sept. 1945 through to the Korean War, it may be worth your while to check both this thread and the other Calling all WWII Essex-class Carrier Fans thread. For example, some Korean War photos used for demonstrating the hull shape can be found at the bottom of this page: viewtopic.php?f=46&t=4802&start=480
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-
Tracy White
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
- Location: EG48
- Contact:
Post war Essexes aren't my thing (yet?????)
But what I've read suggests that the earlier placement of the elevator caused problems and that the later conversions had it further forward where it was less of an impediment.
But what I've read suggests that the earlier placement of the elevator caused problems and that the later conversions had it further forward where it was less of an impediment.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large
"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
- Werner
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:10 am
- Location: (42.24,-87.81)
Yeah. looking through the AOTS plans for an earlier post, I had an "aha" about why Intrepid & Oriskany have their starboard elevator so far aft.
There's still the unexpected variability in the starboard quarter five-inch gun gallery. The last SCB-125s (CV 14,16,19,31,38) have a symmetry which reminds me of the Yorktown CV 5 class. On the others, these guns pop up in unexpected locations.
I think that from a strategic standpoint, during their lives the SCB 125 carriers were the most important ships afloat. Whether in the Eastern Med or The Baltic, they were "in your face" to the bad guy in a way no supercarrier ever could.
Essex in the Kiel Canal is only one example that those who were there will never forget.
There's still the unexpected variability in the starboard quarter five-inch gun gallery. The last SCB-125s (CV 14,16,19,31,38) have a symmetry which reminds me of the Yorktown CV 5 class. On the others, these guns pop up in unexpected locations.
I think that from a strategic standpoint, during their lives the SCB 125 carriers were the most important ships afloat. Whether in the Eastern Med or The Baltic, they were "in your face" to the bad guy in a way no supercarrier ever could.
Essex in the Kiel Canal is only one example that those who were there will never forget.
If an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-- "A Nation at Risk" (1983)
-
Tracy White
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
- Location: EG48
- Contact:
I think the class was one of the most significant of the last century, if not the most.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large
"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
- Elvis965
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:48 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Hey guys...
I just posted this over in the Oriskany thread in the Main Forum, but I thought I'd throw a link in here as well, in case anyone is interested.
ISW has come up with a conversion kit for the Trumpeter 1/350 Essex to the SCB27A modernization.
http://www.commanderseries.com/pages/Essex.html
I've always liked the Essex's with the new island, but still the straight line deck. I thought some other people might as well!
I just posted this over in the Oriskany thread in the Main Forum, but I thought I'd throw a link in here as well, in case anyone is interested.
ISW has come up with a conversion kit for the Trumpeter 1/350 Essex to the SCB27A modernization.
http://www.commanderseries.com/pages/Essex.html
I've always liked the Essex's with the new island, but still the straight line deck. I thought some other people might as well!
- Elvis965
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:48 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Tracy (or anyone, really),
With the demise of the Model Master Marine line, I'd like to get some paint for my 51-52 Oriskany, but I'm not sure what gray I need.
Watching Bridges at Toko Ri, it almost looks like the O is painted in 1941 5-H Haze Gray. It seems darker than the 1943 5-L Light Gray.
I know you are a WW2 Essex man, but I thought you might be able to shed some light!
Thanks
Bob
With the demise of the Model Master Marine line, I'd like to get some paint for my 51-52 Oriskany, but I'm not sure what gray I need.
Watching Bridges at Toko Ri, it almost looks like the O is painted in 1941 5-H Haze Gray. It seems darker than the 1943 5-L Light Gray.
I know you are a WW2 Essex man, but I thought you might be able to shed some light!
Thanks
Bob
- Jack Ray
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:23 am
- Location: Northern Virginia
-
Tracy White
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
- Location: EG48
- Contact:
Deck Blue, badly worn-down as during WWII
http://www.steelnavy.com/EssexKWWarneke.htm
http://www.steelnavy.com/PrincetonCV37TKauffman.htm
http://www.steelnavy.com/EssexKWWarneke.htm
http://www.steelnavy.com/PrincetonCV37TKauffman.htm
Tracy White -Researcher@Large
"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
- Seabee Mike
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:51 pm
- Location: Williamsburg, VA
SCB 27C
I know the majority of posters in this topic are modeling WWII configurations, but I wondered if anyone has done a SCB 27C conversion.
I'm just starting a 1/700 USS Intrepid to match the configuration when my Dad was on board (1954-55). This would be the axial deck version, with the starboard aft elevator. In conjunction with the Intrepid, I am also working the 1/700 Nimitz to match when I was on board (1976-79).
I'd be interested in hearing anyone's tales of conversions.
I'm just starting a 1/700 USS Intrepid to match the configuration when my Dad was on board (1954-55). This would be the axial deck version, with the starboard aft elevator. In conjunction with the Intrepid, I am also working the 1/700 Nimitz to match when I was on board (1976-79).
I'd be interested in hearing anyone's tales of conversions.
- jgrease
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Richmond TX
Somewhat off topic, but not really...
I had started a separate post in another place on the fourm, but someone reminded me to try here as well. Here's my story in a nutshell:
A former co-worker who I am friends with served on the USS Wasp CV-18 around the mid 70s. I had wanted to build up a model for him, but it would seem my only option is the Revell Essex-class in 1/540. That wouldn't be a problem for me, but the kits go for a considerable sum of money on eBay (usually in the range of $50+). I would really have preferred an alternate plan, but I don't have one. Anybody have any other options for me? I guess it's the Revell kit or scratchbuilding. Thanks in advance for any help you can give.
John
A former co-worker who I am friends with served on the USS Wasp CV-18 around the mid 70s. I had wanted to build up a model for him, but it would seem my only option is the Revell Essex-class in 1/540. That wouldn't be a problem for me, but the kits go for a considerable sum of money on eBay (usually in the range of $50+). I would really have preferred an alternate plan, but I don't have one. Anybody have any other options for me? I guess it's the Revell kit or scratchbuilding. Thanks in advance for any help you can give.
John
-
ModelMonkey
- Model Monkey

- Posts: 4098
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:27 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Somewhat off topic, but not really...
Keep watching eBay for a good deal. The Revell kit is actually quite good despite its age. It has been built into some real show-stoppers with a little tender loving care and GMM makes a great PE set for it.jgrease wrote:I guess it's the Revell kit or scratchbuilding. Thanks in advance for any help you can give. John
Have fun, Monkey around. TM
-Steve L.
Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey™ on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby
-Steve L.
Complete catalog: - https://www.model-monkey.com/
Follow Model Monkey™ on Facebook: - https://www.facebook.com/modelmonkeybookandhobby
-
Guest
uss essex class model 1950 or uss intrepid 1969 model.
hello there,
i have got the plans from the floating drydock of the intrepid dated 1969,which is ok. but i want to build one in early 1950,they have plans for the SHANGRI-LA and the PRINCETON and the boxer for 1950-1951 just wanting to know which out the the 3 would be a good set to get??for the 1950s,i have the anatomy of the ship series book and the warships data for uss intrepid for reference .so with that what would be the best set to buy?maybe tracey can help me on this?
cheers matt
i have got the plans from the floating drydock of the intrepid dated 1969,which is ok. but i want to build one in early 1950,they have plans for the SHANGRI-LA and the PRINCETON and the boxer for 1950-1951 just wanting to know which out the the 3 would be a good set to get??for the 1950s,i have the anatomy of the ship series book and the warships data for uss intrepid for reference .so with that what would be the best set to buy?maybe tracey can help me on this?
cheers matt
-
Guest
uss essex class model 1950 or uss intrepid 1969 model.
hi,
i think i found a good set from the floating drydock of this carrier,uss antietam cvs36,good for the period i want,i dont like the new smokestack on some of the essex class after refit in the late 50s that angle.i like the original when built,seems like the antietam didnt have that by looking on navsource,cheers
i think i found a good set from the floating drydock of this carrier,uss antietam cvs36,good for the period i want,i dont like the new smokestack on some of the essex class after refit in the late 50s that angle.i like the original when built,seems like the antietam didnt have that by looking on navsource,cheers
- jgrease
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Richmond TX
Not off-topic at all...
Can anyone tell me if the post-refit carriers in the Essex class have enclosed sides on the flight-deck catwalks or are they open railing? I am working on USS Wasp in her late-60's appearance. It is hard to tell from photos, but there are open railings on the starboard side of the island, but what about the catwalks surrounding the flight deck? Anyone?
-
Guest
cv21 uss boxer
hi,
i got some plans for the uss boxer from the floating drydock,they are dated 1954 and they look great so i will be building that,with the intrepid book by john roberts book i have should be good,cheers
cheers matt
i got some plans for the uss boxer from the floating drydock,they are dated 1954 and they look great so i will be building that,with the intrepid book by john roberts book i have should be good,cheers
cheers matt
- jgrease
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:30 pm
- Location: Richmond TX
Revell 1/540 USS Wasp CVA-18
From another thread, a Revell 1/540 USS Wasp I am building for a co-worker who served. This is the latest shot of the flight deck area. I got this as a built kit, disassembled it and then began to rebuild it as close to references as possible.

I've made good use of Gold Medal Models' PE set for Forrestal/Essex/Midway class carriers - lots of goodies to dress up this old kit. Also, the deck markings are the Starfighter Decals' Wasp set. Comments and observations are welcome.

I've made good use of Gold Medal Models' PE set for Forrestal/Essex/Midway class carriers - lots of goodies to dress up this old kit. Also, the deck markings are the Starfighter Decals' Wasp set. Comments and observations are welcome.