IJN Nagara

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, JIM BAUMANN, Jon, Dan K

User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

58 hours

Post by Angeliccypher »

And here is the results of the linoleum color being painted over the was. Some pictures show up better than others. It is really easy to notice the molded on lines that would be the brass tie down rods now, even in these pictures. I really like the effect. Now I just need to improve the technique going forward.
back of the con tower middle level
back of the con tower middle level
back of the con tower bottom and top levels.
back of the con tower bottom and top levels.
aft deck with main mast
aft deck with main mast
midship deck
midship deck
forward area main deck
forward area main deck
aft area main deck
aft area main deck
Thank you for looking. Comments are always welcome.
Gabriel
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

61 hours

Post by Angeliccypher »

I have finished airbrushing the grey. Anything else that needs to be painted from here on in will be done by hand. I have to admit that this technique was rather intimidating as I was attempting to freehand the airbrushing. Where I do have areas to clean up, I am quite pleased with how close I was able to get things.
bits and bobs
bits and bobs
more bits and bobs
more bits and bobs
aft deck and main mast
aft deck and main mast
bridge
bridge
back of the bridge
back of the bridge
hull aft
hull aft
Hull forward
Hull forward
fan tail
fan tail
bow
bow
Comments are always welcome.
Gabriel
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

70 hours

Post by Angeliccypher »

Another update. the grey is painted onto the modeled on items on the deck. Everything you see in the pictures is attached.
70-1.JPG
70-2.JPG
70-3.JPG
70-4.JPG
Gabriel
User avatar
MartinJQuinn
Posts: 8512
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by MartinJQuinn »

Coming along nicely!
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery
Dan K
Posts: 9037
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Location: New York City

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Dan K »

Agreed. Nice looking work on the TT mounts and bay.
prowler0000
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:40 am
Location: London, UK. (not far from the Cutty Sark!)

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by prowler0000 »

Nice so far!

Any progress?
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

80 hours

Post by Angeliccypher »

There has been some. I will edit this post later and add some pics I have. Mainly going through the absolutely tedious task of adding the brass rods to the linoleum areas of the deck. I have also started work on the water for the base. Then decided to put all this aside and go back to my San Francisco for a bit. Even though I have done a fair amount of clean up on the hull on that, there really appears to be little to show for it at the moment.:)

As promised here are the pictures of my latest on her. Any glare or funky color/reflections are because I took the photos while inside the case from Grandpa's Cabinets (shameless plug for an awesome product).
anchor chains complete and starting the brass rod on the deck.
anchor chains complete and starting the brass rod on the deck.
starting the water shaping
starting the water shaping
You can see the officer gig position in the water.
You can see the officer gig position in the water.
All the bow section of rods are complete up to the bridge.  Any areas that have a structure not currently attached, I will add the bars after they are on.
All the bow section of rods are complete up to the bridge. Any areas that have a structure not currently attached, I will add the bars after they are on.
Forward torpedo deck brass is done.
Forward torpedo deck brass is done.
Aft starboard side is coming along.
Aft starboard side is coming along.
As always, comments and suggestions are welcome. Thank you for looking.
Gabriel
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Angeliccypher »

It is funny how work stalls when you are not happy with how it is turning out.

I am ripping off all of the brass rod and going to use the Flyhawk deck tie down set. This is happening for two reasons: First, I hate the fact that it looks really out of scale. Second the rod sometimes rolls and I end up with glue from Hell to Breakfast and it looks horrible despite my best efforts to remove it. Thanks to all who offered suggestions in the main forum to said dilemma. While I wait for the Flyhawk set I will likely start working on other sections like the funnels to get them ready to attach.
Gabriel
Dan K
Posts: 9037
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Location: New York City

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Dan K »

I understand your frustration. As a general observation, I have to wonder if it's worth it. The actual tie-downs were 30mm wide. In 1/350 scale (and converted to inches), that works out to .0033". That's the width of the brass PE tie-downs included in GMM's 1/700 ultrafine IJN railing set. So, even though the Flyhawk set looks really good, it's still way out of scale. This is why I have my doubt about trying to replicate tie-downs even in this scale.
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Angeliccypher »

I started thinking about the scale and what you were saying there. The size of the tie downs would be so small that it would difficult at best to make look right. Then I remembered the color photo of her posted in the CASF IJN CL thread. Looking at that you cannot really see the tie downs at all. From a scale perspective I think I will simply leave them off and just build the rest of the model. On later ships like Yahagi and Noshiro, or larger ships like Tone and Chikuma, were their tie downs the same size?
Gabriel
Dan K
Posts: 9037
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Location: New York City

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Dan K »

According to Skulski, the width does not change.

I've created a FAQ about the IJN tie-down strips to help folks with some facts and comparison photos here: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=159424
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Angeliccypher »

As always, Thank you Dan!
Gabriel
RichardP
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Lexington, MA

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by RichardP »

I've just started the 1/350 Isuzu and have purchased a couple of the FH 1/700 tie downs sets for it. These are about .007 wide, so yes horrendously over-scale - technically - but I'm going to use them anyway as sometimes your builds are also going to be representative in part as well as accurate. They look petite enough to the eye for me and I like the detail 'effect' it adds.

Also, if you're going to be pedantic, how many other features of the kit are over-scale? Overhanging decks? Splinter shields? Masts and spars? Small weaponry? Anchors? hand rails? Winches? Tread plate? Breakwaters? And so on, and so on.....

Personally, I would encourage you to consider these strips, simply for the effect they provide, despite a [small] lack of accuracy.
Dan K
Posts: 9037
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Location: New York City

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Dan K »

I certainly understand about representative. I'm never 100% accurate.
RichardP
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Lexington, MA

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by RichardP »

Yikes! I'm having a bad use of wording foot-in-mouth moment. :Oops_1:
I in no way meant to suggest that anyone is being pedantic. Rather that it could be OK to stray from being completely accurate when considering add-ons given that kits generally are not spot on in many ways.
Sorry.
Dan K
Posts: 9037
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Location: New York City

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Dan K »

No offense taken. It is ok; no kit can be perfectly accurate. My point is that if one is striving for accuracy in terms of scale, it's borderline for 1/350 ( I can see possibly doing them in this scale for myself) and completely unrealistic for 1/700. The point I was trying to make here, for this particular build and the angst it has generated, is that the tie-downs are not a necessity.
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Angeliccypher »

No offense taken here either. :) I do agree about many things being out of scale. I think each part is a choice. In this case it is less headache (and money) for me to simply leave off a detail that would not really be seen. Although there are plenty of things I divorce that same logic.

As of now I have removed the tie downs and have almost finished cleaning up the left over mess it generated on my deck. Work on everything else is about to resume.
Gabriel
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

84 hours

Post by Angeliccypher »

After ripping up all the tie down rods and spending time to clean up the mess I managed to get some new construction done.
Free handed the black on the mast.
Free handed the black on the mast.
Gabriel
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

88 hours

Post by Angeliccypher »

After painting all of my PE and working on the small fiddly bits that belong on the decks I was able to attach said bits as well as the structures between the funnels.
88-1.JPG
88-2.JPG
Gabriel
User avatar
Angeliccypher
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:38 am

Re: IJN Nagara

Post by Angeliccypher »

I am not happy with the way this kit is turning out so I am going to muscle through it and do the best I can none the less. If nothing else I have learned a lot. Working on the funnels now. Photos to come in the next day or two of them being completed.
Gabriel
Post Reply

Return to “Works in Progress”