by jjb » Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:26 am
Yes, the last Leander conversion gave the RN probably 80% of the capability of a Type 22 at a fraction of the cost, they were extremely capable ships. As a youngster I hated the Leander conversions that lost the twin 4.5" guns but now I really appreciate the way the design evolved to meet requirements and carry ever more systems never imagined at the start of it's life, the final conversion was a massive increase in capability.
I love the Leanders and Type 12's on many levels,
-aesthetics, they were very elegant, attractive looking ships IMO, I do prefer the Leanders to the earlier nuclear fallout superstructure of early type 12's but both are nice.
-in many ways they were the finest ships produced by Britain post 1945 and were a superbly versatile and yet affordable type that also found a ready export market
-I like the way they demonstrated yet again that "affordable" doesn't have to mean incapable and that it is always better to build a sound basic design with upgrade potential than end up with a design with no real use by trying to achieve too much from the outset on an inadequate budget. Since the basic hull was so "right", these ships were suitable for all sorts of upgrades and additions. Something I see a parallel with in the current Type 45 design.
Yes, the last Leander conversion gave the RN probably 80% of the capability of a Type 22 at a fraction of the cost, they were extremely capable ships. As a youngster I hated the Leander conversions that lost the twin 4.5" guns but now I really appreciate the way the design evolved to meet requirements and carry ever more systems never imagined at the start of it's life, the final conversion was a massive increase in capability.
I love the Leanders and Type 12's on many levels,
-aesthetics, they were very elegant, attractive looking ships IMO, I do prefer the Leanders to the earlier nuclear fallout superstructure of early type 12's but both are nice.
-in many ways they were the finest ships produced by Britain post 1945 and were a superbly versatile and yet affordable type that also found a ready export market
-I like the way they demonstrated yet again that "affordable" doesn't have to mean incapable and that it is always better to build a sound basic design with upgrade potential than end up with a design with no real use by trying to achieve too much from the outset on an inadequate budget. Since the basic hull was so "right", these ships were suitable for all sorts of upgrades and additions. Something I see a parallel with in the current Type 45 design.