GRP hull question

Ask your question about scratchbuilding and RC in this forum.

Moderators: MartinJQuinn, JIM BAUMANN, HMAS, Tiny69, Dave Wooley

jjb
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am

GRP hull question

Post by jjb »

Hi all,

Not sure if this is the right forum for this question or not but can anybody offer advice on pre-formed GRP hulls please. I am planning to build either a RN Type 12 or Leander class Frigate and wonder if there are any hulls that are particularly good or bad and which people would regard as the best option. If a Leander I plan one of the last conversions with Sea Wolf and towed array, many thanks.
User avatar
bismarck builder
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:28 am
Location: alton hampshire uk

Post by bismarck builder »

hi
you need to look on the web for a company called cammet he is very good also look out for psships.
hth
gary
a bad day sailing is better than a good day at the office
jjb
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am

Post by jjb »

Thanks for the tip, Cammet seem to provide a complete kit for the Type 12 which looks attractive, do you know how good the kit is? Thanks.
User avatar
JIM BAUMANN
Posts: 5686
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Nr Southampton England

Post by JIM BAUMANN »

From what I have seen at the model shows--it is EXCELLENT--with beautiful PE

Cheers

Jim Baumann
....I buy them at three times the speed I build 'em.... will I live long enough to empty my stash...?
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery ... index.html

IPMS UK SIG (special interest group) www.finewaterline.com
User avatar
bismarck builder
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:28 am
Location: alton hampshire uk

Post by bismarck builder »

hi
what Jim said
if you can wait a few months you can see Cammet at the 3 day event at Warwick in November this show is a must.
cheers
gary
a bad day sailing is better than a good day at the office
middle_watch
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:00 am
Location: S Yorks, England

Post by middle_watch »

Second that, met Canmet the man at a show a couple of years ago when I was first thinking about getting into ship building and he was a terrific help and his 1/96 Type 12 hulls and fittings were just great. I never actually bought any as I was determined on a 1/72 Leander, but if I ever finish and build Scarborough which is on my wish list he will be my first port of call.
jjb
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am

Post by jjb »

Thanks for the feedback, the Canmet T12 looks to be the one to go with.
middle_watch
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:00 am
Location: S Yorks, England

Post by middle_watch »

Hope you post the build, will you be doing a Type 12 or 12M? Sirmar do type 12M hulls but I think only as a kit, modifying a 12 hull should be interesting, but the width would be slightly out for a Seawolf Leander.
jjb
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am

Post by jjb »

Not sure yet, the Type 12/Leander family are my favourite warships and I'd happily model any. If a Leander my favourite would be one of the final upgraded versions with Sea Wolf, if an original Type 12 then I think "as delivered" original configuration.
middle_watch
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 7:00 am
Location: S Yorks, England

Post by middle_watch »

I think the Seawolf was the ultimate Leander, Exocet, Seawolf, Lynx, STWS and half way decent CIWS, they could have really rounded them off of course with a Phallanx on the Hanger roof, but there you go, with a combat survival estimate of 20 minutes we "Leanderites" knew the government did not want to waste too much money on us ;)

Good luck with the build, whatever you decide, nice to know there are still plenty of Type 12 fans around.
jjb
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:28 am

Post by jjb »

Yes, the last Leander conversion gave the RN probably 80% of the capability of a Type 22 at a fraction of the cost, they were extremely capable ships. As a youngster I hated the Leander conversions that lost the twin 4.5" guns but now I really appreciate the way the design evolved to meet requirements and carry ever more systems never imagined at the start of it's life, the final conversion was a massive increase in capability.
I love the Leanders and Type 12's on many levels,
-aesthetics, they were very elegant, attractive looking ships IMO, I do prefer the Leanders to the earlier nuclear fallout superstructure of early type 12's but both are nice.
-in many ways they were the finest ships produced by Britain post 1945 and were a superbly versatile and yet affordable type that also found a ready export market
-I like the way they demonstrated yet again that "affordable" doesn't have to mean incapable and that it is always better to build a sound basic design with upgrade potential than end up with a design with no real use by trying to achieve too much from the outset on an inadequate budget. Since the basic hull was so "right", these ships were suitable for all sorts of upgrades and additions. Something I see a parallel with in the current Type 45 design.
Post Reply

Return to “Scratchbuilding questions and answers”