The Ship Model Forum

by **Indo Bismarck** » Sat Nov 22, 2014 8:57 pm

Fantastic build, haven seen the last information for a while. I hope i can follow into your footsteps or getting close to them.

by **KevinYoung** » Sat May 10, 2014 11:13 am

So much talent your ship is incredible.

by **silvershadow** » Fri May 02, 2014 4:55 am

This looks super awesome!!

by **Mickosh3** » Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:22 am

Hi, everybody!
Thanks, Bernd!
So, friends, wellcome to my new topic - "Part 2. the aft superstructure" (viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154715).

See you there!
Anatoly

by **109** » Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:13 pm

I like it!

by **Mickosh3** » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:29 am

Hallo, everybody!
The S -transmitters were reconstructed again- according with Bernd's recomendations:

With best regards -
Anatoly

by **109** » Wed Dec 04, 2013 5:14 am

Hi,

I sent you some info via email. HTH.

Bye now

by **Mickosh3** » Sat Nov 23, 2013 1:39 pm

Hi, everybody!

The post is an unexpected part of my topic.

Due to Bernd�s criticism of my version the S-transmitters (Bugschallanlage) , I decided to make a reconstruction of the part of my model. As a sample I took the Bernd�s version (download/file.php?id=58379&mode=view). Also I carefully explored the photos which I had- really, it was a good job for my fancy to see the Bugschallanlage on the photos!
Censors , I think, worked very well here!

The result of my work you can see on attached pictures.

With best regards-
Anatoly

by **109** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:45 am

Bugschallanlage is the correct terminus. It is the active sonar located in the Taylor bow. I will send you an email.

Your Version fits Sh and Gn and Hipper

Bye!

by **Mickosh3** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:32 am

Hi, Bernd!
What means the "Schallanlage"(Schaltanlage)?
Yes, if you see some distortions, please, show me them - as detailed as possible. I will do max to improve the situation.

With best regards-
Anatoly

by **109** » Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:19 am

Hi anatoly,

I posted the Schallanlage in my Bismarck build. Your version is incorrect. Bs and Tp had an other arrangement of the plates. Do you need any measurements?

Bye!

by **Mickosh3** » Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:50 pm

Hi everybody!
Section XXII - is next and last.
So, friends, it is time to say "good-bye!" for the topic. My thanks -for all who interested and supported me.
The hull will stay in its box and will be waiting the other parts and painting. Rest works with the hull you can find as additional info in... In my next topic, of course!

With best wishes-
Anatoly

by **Fliger747** » Tue Nov 05, 2013 3:46 pm

I have friends in Novosibirsk whom I have visited, I enjoyed my time in Russia. Spend more time these days flitting in and out of the stans these days, was in ALMATY a few weeks ago.

The technical aspect of these ships can be very fascinating. It is amazing what could be done in the pre microchip analogue era with skilled operators of complex equipment. I also have a very large library, but one that focuses mostly on operational and historical events.

Keep on with the good work on a very long term project!

Regards. Tom

by **Mickosh3** » Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:18 pm

Hi, Tom!
To be honest, a shipmodelling was my little hobby - really, it wasn't very serious. But I like the tecnical history and I have the large tecnical library. My "ripening" for the Bismarck was long and even unexpected ( the Hachette's partwork was a final drop..)
The battleship was a tecnical masterpiece -the every detail is important- and I am trying to be correct in a every detail. And I believe, I have enough powder to continue and win!

With best regards-
Anatoly

by **Fliger747** » Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:59 pm

That you are able to produce this level of detail in the hull speaks to an amazing level of research for a ship long gone.

Thanks for sharing! T

by **Mickosh3** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:50 am

Hi, friends!
Thanks for your kindly feedbacks! They are a good stimulation in my work!

by **ADM** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:17 am

You're probably building the most accurate hull ever seen for the Bismark

by **Neptune** » Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:15 am

The hull is my favorite part of any ship. Your hull is excellent. I'm pretty sure it's the most detailed one around in that scale. Very sharp work and looks flawless!

by **Capit�o Norbert** » Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:35 am

Thank you Anatoly
I always see your topic too with great interest and the detail of many things
you do i very good and worthy of a great modeler indeed

by **Mickosh3** » Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:11 am

Thank you, Capitao!
I believe, your deck won't be worse! I watch for your work with great interest!

Anatoly

The Ship Model Forum

1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.

Re: 1/200 Bismarck. Part 1. The hull.