The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2025 8:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4617 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 227, 228, 229, 230, 231
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:45 am
Posts: 524
in that video, it shows 6 docking keels when there is supposed to be 8 of them.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2025 12:41 am 
IJN Kongo in 1/350 by Border Models coming soon. It looks interesting.

https://www.bordermodel.com/Newproducts_News/481.html


Report this post
Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2025 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 8357
Location: New Jersey
Daytona675R wrote:
A 30-minute review of the new 1/350 USS Arizona from Chuanyu.

https://youtu.be/g8ZokMav2iw?si=T-KexJrH-ZLUDr6q


This is the best part of the review :heh:
Attachment:
BestModelingAdvice.jpg
BestModelingAdvice.jpg [ 302.03 KiB | Viewed 1904 times ]

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2018 2:00 pm
Posts: 620
https://www.scalemates.com/kits/very-fire-beaver-corporation-ijn-battleship-hiei--1626928

1.350 Hiei (1940) from VeryFire / Beaver Corporation.

A 1.350 plastic Hiei will be most welcome. Considering her three sisters have already been done in plastic.

Now all we will need is a 1:350 Ise and Hyuga in 1930s-40s full battleship fit.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 5:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:13 am
Posts: 400
Location: BRUSSELS, Belgium
Mr. Church wrote:

Now all we will need is a 1:350 Ise and Hyuga in 1930s-40s full battleship fit.



These ones you have now in 3D printing by SS Model.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 5:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:56 pm
Posts: 94
Very fire seem to have forgotten there plans to release KGV, Renown or Vanguard as announced a few yrs ago?


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 6:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:50 am
Posts: 251
There already are 1/350 models of Renown and Vanguard, though not in plastic.

I built Tamiya's KGV a few years ago and was surprised by the quality of the model even though it's decades old; albeit I would agree that some new tooling for the KGVs wouldn't hurt, particularly if they made something else than King George herself and Prince of Wales. Duke of York would be a nice pick to pair with a Scharnhorst.

Maybe they've changed their mind about what would be more profitable to market.

_________________
We can have all of the resources in the world and still get it wrong. Not out of any incompetence, it's just because of how difficult it is sometimes to implement a physical feature without having seen it with your own two eyes. - the Chieftain


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 3:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2018 2:00 pm
Posts: 620
PHILIPPE wrote:
Mr. Church wrote:

Now all we will need is a 1:350 Ise and Hyuga in 1930s-40s full battleship fit.



These ones you have now in 3D printing by SS Model.


Cheers. I think I'll hold out for plastic ones. Not sure I fancy 3d prints on that scale.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 3:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2018 2:00 pm
Posts: 620
Bob the Stug wrote:
Very fire seem to have forgotten there plans to release KGV, Renown or Vanguard as announced a few yrs ago?


Would love to see a 1.350 plastic Vanguard with wood deck and photoetch details.

If the designers were clever they could have separately mounted barbecues. And then use the same kit to do a never completed Lion Class with nine 16 inch guns in three triple turrets. The Lions were never completed so it could be argued they would have been completed exactly as per Vanguard only with different main guns.

I am not really nterested in never completed ships myself, but it would seem to allow a manufacturer to kill two birds with one stone fairly easily in the case of Vanguard and Lion.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 5:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2025 8:50 am
Posts: 251
Mr. Church wrote:
If the designers were clever they could have separately mounted barbecues. And then use the same kit to do a never completed Lion Class with nine 16 inch guns in three triple turrets. The Lions were never completed so it could be argued they would have been completed exactly as per Vanguard only with different main guns.

Vanguard and the previous Lions have different hull lines, not to talk about different dimensions and superstructure layout. I see where you're coming from, and it would be appealing to do so, but there's just no common parts to be shared between the classes except the secondary battery, the AA and some miscellaneous items like fire control and boats.

_________________
We can have all of the resources in the world and still get it wrong. Not out of any incompetence, it's just because of how difficult it is sometimes to implement a physical feature without having seen it with your own two eyes. - the Chieftain


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:19 pm
Posts: 709
Location: Seattle Area
Did we previously note that Very Fire is doing the Shinano as well?

https://www.scalemates.com/kits/very-fi ... o--1626925

_________________
"Also we will never see a 1/350 late war Enterprise from Dragon due to a paralyzing fear of success...." - Heavy Melder

Lots of unfinished model ships + attention issues = A busy slipway where nothing gets done!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:46 pm
Posts: 46
Sorry if I have missed this being mentioned before but it seems last month Flyhawk released an HMS Hood in 1940 fit.

https://www.scalemates.com/kits/flyhawk ... 0--1626517

A bit of a left field choice. I would have thought it wouldnt be that difficult to modify the 1941 kit to 1940 fit. Maybe one day they will release an earlier prerefit hood with 5.5" secondaries ideally say a 1938 fit.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 7:55 pm
Posts: 27
Gcj wrote:
A bit of a left field choice. I would have thought it wouldnt be that difficult to modify the 1941 kit to 1940 fit. Maybe one day they will release an earlier prerefit hood with 5.5" secondaries ideally say a 1938 fit.

Not likely to be difficult but Flyhawk do seem to take forever with some of their 1:700 projects.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:27 am
Posts: 851
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Quote:
Sorry if I have missed this being mentioned before but it seems last month Flyhawk released an HMS Hood in 1940 fit.


Hmmm....

It doesn't seem to have been released yet. Not on Ebay or Hobby Easy pre-order.

But July 3 was 85 years since Mers-el-Kebir....coincidence?

Nice box art though!

_________________
Hard a starboard.......Shoot!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:46 pm
Posts: 46
PaulC wrote:
Quote:
Sorry if I have missed this being mentioned before but it seems last month Flyhawk released an HMS Hood in 1940 fit.


Hmmm....

It doesn't seem to have been released yet. Not on Ebay or Hobby Easy pre-order.

But July 3 was 85 years since Mers-el-Kebir....coincidence?

Nice box art though!


Its on ebay https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/127194180798 ... p_homepage

Rather smart by flyhawk - looking at the listing it seems the difference between 1940 and 1941 - ships boats and mast details - are covered by 2 small 3d printed rafts the plastic and PE look unaltered.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2025 5:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 177
PaulC wrote:
Quote:
Sorry if I have missed this being mentioned before but it seems last month Flyhawk released an HMS Hood in 1940 fit.


Hmmm....

It doesn't seem to have been released yet. Not on Ebay or Hobby Easy pre-order.

But July 3 was 85 years since Mers-el-Kebir....coincidence?

Nice box art though!

It doesn't look like coincidence. The Hood in 1941 fit (FH1160) was released on May 24, 2021, and the history was explicitly mentioned in the announcement.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2025 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:27 am
Posts: 851
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
PaulC wrote:
Its on ebay https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/127194180798 ... p_homepage


Ahhhh...it's my location. If I change my shipping from Jamaica to the USA, it comes up in the search results. The current sellers don't ship to Jamaica.

Gcj wrote:
It doesn't look like coincidence. The Hood in 1941 fit (FH1160) was released on May 24, 2021, and the history was explicitly mentioned in the announcement


OK, makes sense.

_________________
Hard a starboard.......Shoot!


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4617 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 227, 228, 229, 230, 231

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Devin and 9 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group