The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2025 9:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Hi fellows, i've been a little busy with a few things but i'm hoping to get back to this model next week and do the most i can on it since i start school once again in 2 weeks :Mad_6: here is some of the process on the Tone's bridge:

Attachment:
DSC_0008.jpg
DSC_0008.jpg [ 143.32 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0009.jpg
DSC_0009.jpg [ 131.77 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0014.jpg
DSC_0014.jpg [ 109.38 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0002.jpg
DSC_0002.jpg [ 115.03 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0003.jpg
DSC_0003.jpg [ 128.98 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0004.jpg
DSC_0004.jpg [ 131.21 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0001.jpg
DSC_0001.jpg [ 117.04 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0006.jpg
DSC_0006.jpg [ 127.25 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0005.jpg
DSC_0005.jpg [ 129.19 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0007.jpg
DSC_0007.jpg [ 143.74 KiB | Viewed 4097 times ]


i took all these shots before i primed the structure, if you'd like to see it you can always go to the Tone section on "Calling all ship fans" i'll take fresh new shots next time

Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 9:13 am
Posts: 291
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
Good start. Very interesting.
Dirk :wave_1:

_________________
Dirk
http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery/users/Dirk-Ponge/user-index.html


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:17 pm
Posts: 582
Impressive idea. Looking superb so far. :thumbs_up_1:

_________________
Current Builds:
1-350 DKM Z-39
1-350 USS Philippine Sea


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:21 pm
Posts: 591
Location: Sarina, Nth Queensland
Jose, when you say the rear entrance to the torp bay is inaccurate, do you mean for the year you (1939) are building or for its entire lifespan?

_________________
Image


I was depressed last night, so I rang lifeline. Got a call centre in
Afghanistan and told them I was suicidal.

They got all excited and asked if I could drive a truck.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Thank you so much guys!!

Kym Knight wrote:
Jose, when you say the rear entrance to the torp bay is inaccurate, do you mean for the year you (1939) are building or for its entire lifespan?



Kym, on the few sources i have, models i've seen in the past there is no such entrance ( OPENING) into the torpedo bay through the rear deck, i've seen bulkhead doors along side the aircraft slide on some models though which is the case of the new 1/700 Fujimi Tone (1944 &1945) but like i wrote there is no such entrance of that magnitude. if and only if Tamiya found a good source which we havent seen yet and thus based their model on that source then i'll rest my case but as far as i know i believe is wrong. my 1939 miyukikai plan shows an enclosed bulkhead. btw, how is your Tone coming up?


Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:40 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8841
Location: New York City
Looks great so far, Jose. Very crisp.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm
Posts: 3134
Location: Oslo, Norway
Excellent so far, and dont forget that the turrets had exercise aim devices on the turret's roof.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:03 am 
Offline
L'Arsenal
L'Arsenal
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:22 pm
Posts: 91
Hi Jose,

Great work so far, I'll kepp watching!

Greetings from Switzerland

Michael


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Thanks again guys!!, i got a question..


Attachment:
bridge.jpg
bridge.jpg [ 146.42 KiB | Viewed 3811 times ]



Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Disregard my question i was just being lazy about going through some of the pages on the " calling all ship fans" section i got the linoleum answer already.



Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Fellows i need advice on the paint i know Tone was built and launched at Mitsubishi yards and i think i remember looking at a Tamiya bottle of grey with the Mitsubishi name on it but today while looking at Tamiya's paint charts i couldn't find it. Is Tamiya still selling this paint if not which Tamiya paints can i mixed to come up with something similar? TIA



Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Attachment:
DSC_0001.jpg
DSC_0001.jpg [ 121.31 KiB | Viewed 3738 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0002.jpg
DSC_0002.jpg [ 140.25 KiB | Viewed 3738 times ]


Attachment:
DSC_0006.jpg
DSC_0006.jpg [ 148.64 KiB | Viewed 3738 times ]



tomorrow i'll try to buy the paint at my LHS, hopefully i'll have an answer tonite regarding the color, thats all for today,, stay tuned for more



Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 38
Regarding the rear bulkhead in question. I think it is possible that Tamiya has it somewhat correct.

For of all, the area in question was just an empty space according to Japanese Cruisers of the Pacific War. If it was just an open space, it might not be necessary to enclose the entire area with bulkhead. I also find some photo evidences to somewhat supports what Tamiya suggests.

Picture 1 - This photo of Tone showed it was not a door that was next to the ramp but an opening. It was too wide to be a doorway. It was true there was bulkhead there but it also proved other drawings that had doors in the area were also wrong

Picture 2 - This photo of Chikuma in 1941. It is clear to me there wasn't a solid bulkhead as you can see the perforated bar. I believe the area was open with perforated supporting bean across similar to the Takeo class CA.

I don't know for sure either way but based on the evidences, Tamiya could be right.


Attachments:
Tone.jpg
Tone.jpg [ 30.64 KiB | Viewed 3721 times ]
Chikuma.jpg
Chikuma.jpg [ 30.92 KiB | Viewed 3721 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:36 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: About 50 miles away from the Gulf of Mexico ( traveling W is you do so :)
Thats quite an observation on the perforated bar and from this picture it doesn't look like a solid bulkhead at all. Empty space? i thought it was all part of the torpedoe bay? there is something i can't overrule on the kit and it bothers me why is the opening asymmetrical? left side extends more than that the right. your points are noted and is good evidence but why not make this entrance all symmetrical? Wish we knew what souce Tamiya used. thanks for chiming in!!

Attachment:
Tone 5.jpg
Tone 5.jpg [ 110.57 KiB | Viewed 3714 times ]




Jose :wave_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 4:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:31 pm
Posts: 328
Location: Cornwall, UK
Very nice work so far Jose :thumbs_up_1:


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:00 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8841
Location: New York City
Unfortunately, clear photos of the area in question are rare. I think that the photo above of Tone 1940 has it right, full bulkheads with apertures that are not necessarily hatches on both sides. See also the last two photo belows, also of Tone, taken on the same day. It appears to match the first photo to me.. IIRC, the aperture is reminiscent of a similar feature on the Myokos, sort of a loading bay aperture. Probably has a garage roller style door that comes down in heavy weather.

Some other photos - Soryu and Chikuma from the IJN 1940 Naval Review, with cropping, Chikuma at Leyte Gulf, 10-25-1944, and Tone from the other side at the 1940 Naval Review


Attachments:
Chikuma & Soryu, 1940 small.jpg
Chikuma & Soryu, 1940 small.jpg [ 118.23 KiB | Viewed 3630 times ]
Chikuma a-c decl closeup, 1940 Gakken #47.jpg
Chikuma a-c decl closeup, 1940 Gakken #47.jpg [ 77.85 KiB | Viewed 3630 times ]
Chikuma at Leyte Gulf, 10-25-1944, Gakken #47small.jpg
Chikuma at Leyte Gulf, 10-25-1944, Gakken #47small.jpg [ 88.37 KiB | Viewed 3630 times ]
Chikuma at Leyte Gulf, 10-25-1944, stern crop #47.jpg
Chikuma at Leyte Gulf, 10-25-1944, stern crop #47.jpg [ 53.87 KiB | Viewed 3630 times ]
Tone, 1940, Gakken #47small.jpg
Tone, 1940, Gakken #47small.jpg [ 98.5 KiB | Viewed 3630 times ]
Tone, 1940, Gakken #47 a-c deck crop alt.jpg
Tone, 1940, Gakken #47 a-c deck crop alt.jpg [ 110.98 KiB | Viewed 3630 times ]
Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:37 am
Posts: 1500
Location: Massachusetts.
I would leave it open. I'm pretty sure it was to store floats to the planes and drums of fuel. Plus to relieve in case a hit to the torpedo rooms. The Japanese always worried about the long lance 1000lbs warheads going off in an inclosed space. this is part of the design like it or not. Remember these ship did not have a hanger!

_________________
On the Bench
1/350 Independence
1/350 Dunkerque
1/350 Shimakaze
1/350 Sharnhorst Dragon
1/350 Belfast


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:51 am 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8841
Location: New York City
I just can't agree. My take of the photos is some large bay doors for access, set within the bulkheads.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:21 pm
Posts: 3384
Location: equidistant to everywhere
Dan, When I look at your photo from the book cover, I think I see the bulkhead in essentially the Tamiya configuration. The only question is whether there was a small closed section right ahead of the aircraft ramp.

In any case, leaving it open greatly expands interior detailing opportunities for Jose. Imaging all the overhead porforated deck beams, deck support pillars, torpedo handling gear that he can now sink his fangs into. :big_grin:

_________________
Assessing the impact of new area rug under modeling table.


Last edited by Timmy C on Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The "Edit" button, Chuck, not the "Quote"! =P


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 3:30 pm 
Online

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 8841
Location: New York City
Funny, I see it the other way, a close bulkhead with an aperture, that matches the other side.

Front pictorial page of Gakken # 47


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dan K, FFG-7 and 99 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group