Calling all Bismarck and Tirpitz fans

Battleships and Battlecruisers of all nations and eras.
BB and BC.

Moderators: BB62vet, MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey

Post Reply
tomcat Fanatic
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:05 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tomcat Fanatic »

I have one quick question regarding Bismarck kits in 1/350, which one to buy, Revell or Tamiya ?
Plan to build Bismarck from may 41 first and last cruis.
User avatar
NigelR32
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:27 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by NigelR32 »

tomcat Fanatic wrote:I have one quick question regarding Bismarck kits in 1/350, which one to buy, Revell or Tamiya ?
Plan to build Bismarck from may 41 first and last cruis.
If you search around on here and on other sites I think the general concensus is that the Revell kit is superior to the Tamiya kit. I bought the Tamiya kit for the quality and simpler construction. The Revell kit is better detailed without a doubt, with extras such as inj moulded railings??? You need to decide for yourself mate.

Just buy the Trumpeter 1/200 and be done with it!!
Regards

Nigel
User avatar
Perth_shipyard
Posts: 677
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Location: Fremantle Western Australia

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Perth_shipyard »

Agree with Nigel, go for the revell definitely over tamiya. I'd also be biased and say the trumpeter 1/200 ;)

If you do go with the revell though, please do yourself a favour and replace the railings at a minimum. The plastic ones in the kit are way over scale. They're more like balaustrading on an industrial site than railings on a ship.
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy
User avatar
tms
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Greece

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tms »

in connection with my questions above, I noticed that even on builders' model the life rings are white or at least very light grey; could this be a fact of the real color?

Greetings to all,
Christos
User avatar
Perth_shipyard
Posts: 677
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
Location: Fremantle Western Australia

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Perth_shipyard »

tms wrote:in connection with my questions above, I noticed that even on builders' model the life rings are white or at least very light grey; could this be a fact of the real color?

Greetings to all,
Christos

Life rafts were light grey same as the superstructure. It is known that the KM later had yellow rafts, but these rafts were usually square in shape and not the rectangular early shape.

The life rings would have been red as it was predominately for man overboard and needed to be seen.
AT
1/72 Arleigh Burke flight iia
1/72 Hobart class AWD HMAS Brisbane
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=154767
1/72 Friesland
1/75 Wasa
1/53 STS Leeuwin II
1/72 HMAS Perth 1942
1/72 Russian Corvette Steregushchy
User avatar
tms
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Greece

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tms »

My apologies for trying to reply without logging-in. Admin, please disregard my previous message.

Here we go again

Thanks for the info. Any idea also on my question for the width of the shelter bridge wings and those the width of the deck above?

Looking in your nice built I notices that trumpeter is giving them as a unified stucture.

Greetings,
Christos
tomcat Fanatic
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:05 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tomcat Fanatic »

THX.. I will go with revell Bismarck, will include gun barrels and railings for sure.. I did check on the net, but I always duble check
User avatar
Olaf Held
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Location: Flensburg, Germany

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Olaf Held »

The yellow square rafts are not really a late addition. The colour photos from Gotenhafen do show them yellow on L�tzow (with Bismarck in the background).

Later, it could have happened that rafts and floats were incorporated into the camouflage scheme.


@ Christos ~ Sorry, no idea (yet) ...


Happy modelling ~ Olaf!
User avatar
Herr Nilsson
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Herr Nilsson »

tms wrote:Dear all,

Although rarely posting, I've been watching for several months with great interest, the various highly detailed Bismarck builts in this forum and thank you for valuable information shared.

I would much appreciate the experts' opinion/info on the following:
1.Studying several published pictures and 3d drawings on the bismarck as well as wreck video shoots, it appears to me that the width of the shelter bridge "wings" is greater that the width of the wings of the deck above; however ther is a discrepancy noted in the various drawings/3D images and plastic models. Can anyone enlighten us?
2.There is some equipment installed on top of the shelter bridge wings port & stbd; is there any info on the type/use of this installation?
3. It is apparent on some pictures that the firehoses and life rings are of a dark shade; is this shade orange or red or could be something different i.e grey? was the orange color used at that era for the lifesaving equipment?

Greetings to all
Christos
1. You are right

2. Navigations-Sehrohr
edit: unfortunately the link to the Zeiss virtual museum doesn't work very long. However, most probably it's a "Navigations-Sehrohr".

3. red
Last edited by Herr Nilsson on Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
EJFoeth
Posts: 2924
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:51 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by EJFoeth »

I've seen green on the 1942 camouflage scheme's (around September) on the Gally planset and he insisted this was correct.
The June 1942 splotch pattern appears to be a brown/green combination. Hwowver, Asmussen's camouflage are grey tones only.
User avatar
tms
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Greece

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tms »

A search in the Zeiss museum under navigations-sehrohre revealed the periscope type C9/C11 which looks pretty much similar to the one depicted on the wreck video.

I wish I knew how to post pictures in order to upload the pictures for those interested.

Much helpful, thanks Herr Nilsson.

Christos
User avatar
Herr Nilsson
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Herr Nilsson »

That was the one I wanted to link to, but it didn't work. They use a session ID in their URL, which expires after a while. :-(

edit: hope it works now

try this
User avatar
tms
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Greece

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tms »

Thanks, it is tha same I found by googling "Zeiss virtual museum" as per your previous info.

It seems that this is the item shown in the picture below
Attachments
bridge0001.jpg
User avatar
Olaf Held
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:31 pm
Location: Flensburg, Germany

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Olaf Held »

Are these smaller versions of those sticking out of the main deck?


Happy modelling ~ Olaf!
User avatar
tms
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Greece

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tms »

It is more likely that on the command post roof(conning tower) there were the periscopes mentioned above (navigations sehrohre C9) while on bridge wing roof (shown on wreck picture above) there were binoculars (navigations sehrohr C10), but is difficult to judge from one wreck picture only, of course.
Attachments
virtuelles%20museum6.jpg
virtuelles%20museum6.jpg (2.64 KiB) Viewed 3309 times
virtuelles%20museum4.jpg
virtuelles%20museum4.jpg (1.93 KiB) Viewed 3309 times
User avatar
Herr Nilsson
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:47 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Herr Nilsson »

No, C10 (or C12) is too small. It has to be C9 (or C11). A C10 is for the helmsman. It would make no sense on the bridge wing. You can probably see a C10 on top of the conning tower.
User avatar
tms
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Greece

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by tms »

So, should we assume that we have the arrangement as per below?
Attachments
C9.jpg
User avatar
NigelR32
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:27 pm

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by NigelR32 »

Sorry to punch in your periscope theme here, but I am pulling my hair out right now!! You know when you've seen something on film, and simply can't find it again!!!

Please help me out here...

Dives on Bismarck on You tube....

There's the early one with james cameron where they go down in Russian Subs, then there's the film where the remote subs are sent down, slightly more recent I believe. Then you've got the Nazi Supership film, but, there's also a film where they actually go down in subs and nearly get stuck on a piece of the Hull.

It's this latest film I cant find... can anyone help? I think in this film they finally prove that the Germans actually scuttled Bismarck. I really want to see this film again...
Regards

Nigel
User avatar
BobaFettSlave_1
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:45 am
Location: Massachusetts - USA

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by BobaFettSlave_1 »

NigelR32 wrote:Sorry to punch in your periscope theme here, but I am pulling my hair out right now!! You know when you've seen something on film, and simply can't find it again!!!

Please help me out here...

Dives on Bismarck on You tube....

There's the early one with james cameron where they go down in Russian Subs, then there's the film where the remote subs are sent down, slightly more recent I believe. Then you've got the Nazi Supership film, but, there's also a film where they actually go down in subs and nearly get stuck on a piece of the Hull.

It's this latest film I cant find... can anyone help? I think in this film they finally prove that the Germans actually scuttled Bismarck. I really want to see this film again...
The one where they almost land on a piece of red hull is Expedition Bismarck (the James Cameron one)
User avatar
Channell
Posts: 2068
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:18 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, USA

Re: Calling all DKM Bismarck & Tirpitz fans

Post by Channell »

NigelR32 wrote:Sorry to punch in your periscope theme here, but I am pulling my hair out right now!! You know when you've seen something on film, and simply can't find it again!!!

Please help me out here...

Dives on Bismarck on You tube....

There's the early one with james cameron where they go down in Russian Subs, then there's the film where the remote subs are sent down, slightly more recent I believe. Then you've got the Nazi Supership film, but, there's also a film where they actually go down in subs and nearly get stuck on a piece of the Hull.

It's this latest film I cant find... can anyone help? I think in this film they finally prove that the Germans actually scuttled Bismarck. I really want to see this film again...
Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uba-bxAiWiw
-Jason Channell

Current Project: 1/200 Bismarck
Post Reply

Return to “Battleships”