So this is measure er.. 12?

Area for camouflage and painting questions

Moderators: MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, JWintjes

Post Reply
JCRAY
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:18 pm
Location: Palm Beach, Fla

Re: So this is measure er.. 12?

Post by JCRAY »

EJ ,I don't know for sure but I thought it was a variation of measure 2. It follows the sheer line and the 5 D lower band had been discontinued.
Hth John
Tracy White
Posts: 10627
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: So this is measure er.. 12?

Post by Tracy White »

The destroyer is in Measure 18, actually.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
John Olsen
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:51 am

Re: So this is measure er.. 12?

Post by John Olsen »

Isn't this a little early for Ms 18? The photos date from August, 1941, so a Ms 2 variant seems more likely to me.
Tracy White
Posts: 10627
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: So this is measure er.. 12?

Post by Tracy White »

I don't see evidence of a 5-L mast, which was why I said Measure 18. Rick Davis has a lot of photos of destroyers in it earlier than originally thought, but I'm back from a week off and catching up at work has kept me from doing a search through the stuff he's sent in the past to look. I'll drop him a line...
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
EJFoeth
Posts: 2924
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:51 pm

Re: So this is measure er.. 12?

Post by EJFoeth »

Tracy White wrote:I don't see evidence of a 5-L mast
Can you elaborate? 5-L is a slightly lighter blue-gray than the 5-H on the vertical surfaces but I hadn't noticed the 5-L application on masts in the Measure descriptions.

My main interest is McDougal (late 1941) and by extension the other Porters in their original configuration; I noticed (good) photographs of the Porters & Somers are not very easy to find. I'll have to order the one from the IWM I posted above; it is magnificent.
Tracy White
Posts: 10627
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Location: EG48
Contact:

Re: So this is measure er.. 12?

Post by Tracy White »

Upon further review it's most likely just Measure 12 with a miss-understood bow demarcation pattern. Lots of inconsistencies in source documents that I don't have time or energy to post for discussion, so I'm going to fall back on occam's razor.
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
Post Reply

Return to “Camouflage & Coatings”