The Ship Model Forum

The Ship Modelers Source
It is currently Sun Oct 20, 2019 12:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 356 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
No doors, just open passages. I don't have any photos of the interior of those spaces, unfortunately.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:43 pm 
Tracy White wrote:
No doors, just open passages. I don't have any photos of the interior of those spaces, unfortunately.


tnx, I'll put figures in front, so there's wouldn't be visible inside :-)


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 6668
Location: In the hills of North Jersey
Ballard explores CVL-22: http://www.mercurynews.com/science/ci_3 ... rnia-coast

_________________
Martin

"Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." John Wayne

Ship Model Gallery


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 457
Starting on this kit again as I lost a couple of parts a few years ago. Thank you Dragoncare.com. I just got the WEM photo etch for the Indy and I am not sure what to make out of the port side deck parking plate. Is the top perforated metal like what WEM provides in their set or is it a solid flat steel plate.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 5:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
Port & starboard overhangs and catwalks were perforated to reduce topside weight.

Attachment:
File comment: SO.... many.... holes!!!
CVL22-5086-53 Crop.jpg
CVL22-5086-53 Crop.jpg [ 51.26 KiB | Viewed 4349 times ]

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 457
Thanks Traci


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
Any time John! :big_grin:

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 457
:big_grin:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 305
Four ant. on port side. They look as if they must fold over to clear flight ops. Trying to find photos showing details of the fold mech. where they are hinged into the catwalk.

Any takers on this one ?

Thank you,

Keith


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
Hinged just under the catwalk with a counterweight. Small section of the catwalk turns with it and is replaced with another section mounted to the antenna side.


Attachments:
CVL.jpg
CVL.jpg [ 18.5 KiB | Viewed 3948 times ]

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 4:10 pm 
Tracy you are the man, thank you. I would imagine the lower part, cone, is if not solid then very close to it to act like a counter weight.

Keith


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 8:22 am 
OK, new questions for all :

looking on my CVL-24 Drydock plans, both boat platforms are same length. On the other plans , and other ships, the right side one is a lot shorther.
Also, the left one have one mid platform, and ledders from ship platform to this, and another ladders up to catwalk opening

On all photos that I have, CVL-24 have not this mid platform and ladders
On the other side, I have not any photo of her right boat platform

So, questions are :

Time frame is September 1944, before bomb hit and overhaul

Does The Belleau wood have this mid platform and ladders on left side?
Does the right boat platform was shorter or not??

TIA foe any help!!!
Mario


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:32 pm
Posts: 141
I started a build log here on CVL-23 Princeton: http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=166458

Image

Probably I'm going to try the late camo and build her waterlined. I ordered "Carrier Down" and bought the Warship Pictorial, nr. 40, but are there any magazines that feature Princeton instead of the more usual Independence footage?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:49 am
Posts: 280
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Slowly this class is growing in my intrest. I do not really like the look, the look so "Ersatz" if you know what I mean. But reading reviews and now knowing that Tracy did the technical consultant work on them makes me want to get one in 350...
I just hope Tracy's phone will ring in the not too distant future and Drangon on the other end wants him to do a new Essex family...:-)

cheers
Uwe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
I'd be up for helping regardless of manufacturer. :thumbs_up_1:

Just as long as they work with me instead of "send us all your photos, K.. bye."

One of the things I find interesting with ships is the meshing of the need for hull efficiency with the mission "above the water." The Independence CVLs are an "interesting" design in that you have a beautiful hull form and one of the ugliest structures above the main deck ever to set sail.....

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 563
Location: England
I asked a question a while ago about the 1/700 Dragon kit of USS Belleau Wood and don't recall ever getting an answer. The kit includes an etch Island which is different to the plastic one. Can anyone tell me anything about this? The pics I've seen of the ship during WW2, look more like the plastic kit island.

thanks
Mike


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 11:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
I only worked with Dragon on their 1/350th kits, so I'm not as familiar with the 1/700 offerings. If you mean this kit the enclosed bridge is wrong and looks more like what was installed during her later French Service (That said, I don't know if it's accurate even for that). Most looks mostly right, so it would mainly be a fairly simple rebuild of the enclosed bridge area - all flat shapes.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 563
Location: England
Tracy White wrote:
I only worked with Dragon on their 1/350th kits, so I'm not as familiar with the 1/700 offerings. If you mean this kit the enclosed bridge is wrong and looks more like what was installed during her later French Service (That said, I don't know if it's accurate even for that). Most looks mostly right, so it would mainly be a fairly simple rebuild of the enclosed bridge area - all flat shapes.



Thanks, that makes sense. There's two etch masts, so the next step is to work out which is which! I'm thinking of modelling her in early 44, as I've never modelled a ship in MS14, so I'll have to check out the radar and AA fit, although I suspect the kit is probably accurate enough in that way. Which flight deck stain would she have had in early 44?


thanks
Mike


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 11:02 am
Posts: 9864
Location: EG48
According to Alan Raven:

Quote:
... there was the introduction of a new flight deck stain for carriers called #21 Flight Deck stain which began to be employed on the ESSEX class as they came into service in 1943. This color when newly applied exactly matched that of 5-0 Ocean Gray. This new stain was also used on the flight decks of INDEPENDENCE class CVLs and CVE classes in 1943 and into 1944. About mid 1944 there was the introduction of #21 Flight Deck stain (revised). This revised stain was (when newly applied) identical to 20B deck Blue (revised) and was a near match in service with the introduction in March 1944 of glossy Sea Blue, a new camouflage color for use on carrier aircraft.


I'm on my laptop and am limited to Navsource's CVL-24 page for now. There was a fairly systemic evolution to the mast that might enable you to use other ships photos to fill in the blanks. In early 1944 she would have had what I call the "Early" mast, which featured only a single yardarm to starboard and an angled/wedge truss structure forward, sort f like a stubby construction crane. This was cut off later and a more squared off appearance left. The earlier mast is shown in this photo of CVL-25 Cowpens (larger black & white copy available here). The later mast with a double yardarm and squared off front (as well as what the covered bridge actually looked like during war time) on the same ship is available here for comparison.

_________________
Tracy White -Researcher@Large

"Let the evidence guide the research. Do not have a preconceived agenda which will only distort the result."
-Barbara Tuchman


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:15 am
Posts: 563
Location: England
Tracy White wrote:
According to Alan Raven:

Quote:
... there was the introduction of a new flight deck stain for carriers called #21 Flight Deck stain which began to be employed on the ESSEX class as they came into service in 1943. This color when newly applied exactly matched that of 5-0 Ocean Gray. This new stain was also used on the flight decks of INDEPENDENCE class CVLs and CVE classes in 1943 and into 1944. About mid 1944 there was the introduction of #21 Flight Deck stain (revised). This revised stain was (when newly applied) identical to 20B deck Blue (revised) and was a near match in service with the introduction in March 1944 of glossy Sea Blue, a new camouflage color for use on carrier aircraft.


I'm on my laptop and am limited to Navsource's CVL-24 page for now. There was a fairly systemic evolution to the mast that might enable you to use other ships photos to fill in the blanks. In early 1944 she would have had what I call the "Early" mast, which featured only a single yardarm to starboard and an angled/wedge truss structure forward, sort f like a stubby construction crane. This was cut off later and a more squared off appearance left. The earlier mast is shown in this photo of CVL-25 Cowpens (larger black & white copy available here). The later mast with a double yardarm and squared off front (as well as what the covered bridge actually looked like during war time) on the same ship is available here for comparison.


Would it have been pretty much the same a Independence? I have the Classic Warship book on that, so plenty of good pics.

thanks
Mike


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 356 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group