Chokai is worth retrying anyway.
BR
mucho
Moderators: MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey


Wow, Mucho...your photography skills are excellent! Once the build is completed and you found the right background and put her in water (or did a waterline scene), those up-close shots could very well pass for fake actual photos!Mutsuo Sasaki wrote:Some work in progress in the Chokai build 1/100.
13 months have elapsed since start of this build...
BR
mucho,

Mike C wrote:Those turrets look awesome. Sometimes slow and steady is the best solution. I hope you find some kind of obscure revelation that will inspire you to finish. If it's mostly the small guns, make one of each and install it so seeing it unfinished will drive you crazy. Just joking, of course, but the final reveal should be worth the wait. Best wishes.
hi, Dan, As I wrote to Navy Yard assoc. journal june, Chokai had ca. 60 x 25 mm mgs, almost the same numbers as Maya,1944. I recken mr. Fukui Shizuo must have been kind of mischievous ( info from his file is 38 x 25 mm guns only)when he was asked to report to the 2nd repatriatoin bureau. :)dDan K wrote:Nice! Keep on truckin', Mucho.
Do you mean also in shape ? The base, I mean the gun tubs. As far as I know there is no 100% hard evidence of how IJN Chokai's 1944 AA disposition was. And I guess too the gun tubs, at least the "1944" ones are all fictitious in shape(and size), IJN Maya's too.Shipyards plans (if any post 1943 exist ) might be different of what actually was put in service like size and shape of an AA gun tub and in some rare occasion might the number of the AA actually change too without that getting reflected in the original shipyard plans.Dan K wrote:"similar to Maya?"
no, Dan,those dual barrelled 25mm mgs and number of the gun tubs between the funnels are intact on Chokai.Dan K wrote:So, does that mean that Chokai '44 had AA platform layouts between the funnels similar to Maya? I can't envision any other arrangement.