Thanks! Now that I looked at the pictures closer, it looks like the vertical control is by a rod with a swivel joint in the middle.mpgl62 wrote: It is a protection for the external propeller. Also, the German battleships had it. They were controlled with ropes and probably a cable tensor and / or winch on deck.
The drawing is from Tirpitz, but I think that other major german warships were similar.
Calling all Kriegsmarine Prinz Eugen, Admiral Hipper & Blücher fans
Moderators: MartinJQuinn, Timmy C, Gernot, Olaf Held, Dan K, HMAS, ModelMonkey
-
rvuorenr
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:36 am
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
- Firesmacker
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:35 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Gentlemen, I'm in a bit of a quandary-
I'm staring at both the 1/350 Prinz Eugen and the Blucher and can't decide on which one to start.
My problem is that the only dedicated PE set I can find is from WEM. For some reason, I ended up with 2 Eduard PE sets for the Prinz Eugen. They're both railings only.
I've looked at the instructions for both kits and with the exception of some cosmetic differences, they are very similar. The main differences seem to be in the superstructure. Would the Prinz Eugen PE set work on the Blucher? I don't mind getting creative here and there, I just don't want to find out the 50% of the PE set is wrong for this kit.
Any help would be appreciated.
I'm staring at both the 1/350 Prinz Eugen and the Blucher and can't decide on which one to start.
My problem is that the only dedicated PE set I can find is from WEM. For some reason, I ended up with 2 Eduard PE sets for the Prinz Eugen. They're both railings only.
I've looked at the instructions for both kits and with the exception of some cosmetic differences, they are very similar. The main differences seem to be in the superstructure. Would the Prinz Eugen PE set work on the Blucher? I don't mind getting creative here and there, I just don't want to find out the 50% of the PE set is wrong for this kit.
Any help would be appreciated.
Jeff
Sorry, folks, parks closed. The moose out front should have told ya'.
Sorry, folks, parks closed. The moose out front should have told ya'.
- Captain Morgan
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: SE Michigan
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Hipper was Blucher�s sister ship (brother ship for DKM?) so more of of what fits Hipper would work for Blucher. PE was bigger.
My CO prior to flying to the boomer: Our goals on this patrol is to shoot missiles and torpedoes.
Me Jr Lt Capt, don’t we really want to be like Monty Python and not be seen?
LT you seem to be missing the big picture
Oh
Me Jr Lt Capt, don’t we really want to be like Monty Python and not be seen?
LT you seem to be missing the big picture
Oh
- Firesmacker
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:35 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Thanks for the info.
Jeff
Sorry, folks, parks closed. The moose out front should have told ya'.
Sorry, folks, parks closed. The moose out front should have told ya'.
- pascalemod
- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Considering conversion of Trumpeters 1/700 Admiral Hipper 1940 version into 1939 version. Is it enough to shorten the bow and remove couple of radars and funnel cap? Or were there more changes? I assume the bow is a straight forward chop. I really like the look of german ship before the clipper bows etc and this seems the closest I get sans Deutschland class.
Appreciate some help on this idea and if easily doable?
Appreciate some help on this idea and if easily doable?
- @Shipific on IG
my gallery
my gallery
-
maxim
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
- Location: Bonn
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
The stem is different, likely the sides of the foreship have less flare, perhaps the anchor positions have to be modified, the upper bridge was open.. Should be doable.
- pascalemod
- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Mhmm... Cant be impossible. once Im done with another project I might take that on as the pre-clipper bow Kriegsmarine ships look that much nicer to me for some reason.maxim wrote:The stem is different, likely the sides of the foreship have less flare, perhaps the anchor positions have to be modified, the upper bridge was open.. Should be doable.
- @Shipific on IG
my gallery
my gallery
-
DougC
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
1/700 Hipper class by Trumpeter.
The Prinz Eugen has a larger hull than the Hipper. Do the Trumpeter models reflect this?
The Prinz Eugen has a larger hull than the Hipper. Do the Trumpeter models reflect this?
-
maxim
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
- Location: Bonn
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
As far I as I know: yes. The hulls are different. As written earlier, the division of the hull is different. Prinz Eugen is depicted is fully loaded, Admiral Hipper as completely empty (which looks weird, because the waterline hull is very high out of the water). Therefore very likely also the length is different. I have only the Admiral Hipper, therefore I cannot check myself.
- Captain Morgan
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:14 am
- Location: SE Michigan
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Speaking on memory from when I first built them, yes the PE and Hipper are the proper sizes for each ship. PE may actually be a little long by about .5 inch IIRC.DougC wrote:1/700 Hipper class by Trumpeter.
The Prinz Eugen has a larger hull than the Hipper. Do the Trumpeter models reflect this?
My CO prior to flying to the boomer: Our goals on this patrol is to shoot missiles and torpedoes.
Me Jr Lt Capt, don’t we really want to be like Monty Python and not be seen?
LT you seem to be missing the big picture
Oh
Me Jr Lt Capt, don’t we really want to be like Monty Python and not be seen?
LT you seem to be missing the big picture
Oh
-
maxim
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:23 am
- Location: Bonn
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Regarding Prinz Eugen: I recalling that some said that the hull is too long - but at the waterline. But that could be caused by the difference of the waterline at "standard" displacement and fully loaded.
- pascalemod
- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:33 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Full load vs light - its ok in full hull terms, so not an issue (but sucks for waterline guys because gonna need to saw down Hipper hull, here I just paint the bootopping on the upper hull).maxim wrote:As far I as I know: yes. The hulls are different. As written earlier, the division of the hull is different. Prinz Eugen is depicted is fully loaded, Admiral Hipper as completely empty (which looks weird, because the waterline hull is very high out of the water). Therefore very likely also the length is different. I have only the Admiral Hipper, therefore I cannot check myself.
As for backdating Hipper to 1939 from 1940, my very crude fast first research shows that I need to chop of the nose for the profile ( no need to lower the deck). See pics attached from Eric Leon, they are scaled as closely to each other as I could do on laptop, but shows fairly small difference (same anchor positions etc).
As for the flare I don't know. Probably there is SOME difference but is it enough for 1/700 scale to be worth the hassle of making changes to the deck and hull? Smth tells me this was just an addition of the bow like on Lutzow exDeutschland with minimum flare, sort of version 1.0, where there was not huge amount of new flare. And to continue this example, the Prinz Eugen and Blucher bows were similar to the bow on Admiral Scheer post refit (a full rebuilt with significantly more flare etc). Makes sense? ... How would you go about removing the stem tip and flare yourself, assuming the capstan and anchor positions remain?...
And then just remove the funnel cap and some radars and AA guns, voila a nicer looking (IMHO) cruiser with beautiful straight stem.
- @Shipific on IG
my gallery
my gallery
-
thebunkerparodie
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:10 am
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
can I use a trumpeter prinz eugen for a DKM Lutzow or not (I want to do it achieved as german ).
- Maarten Sch�nfeld
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 pm
- Location: Herk-de-Stad, Belgium
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Of course you can! However, L�tzow (note the dots on the �, the pronunciation is quite different in German when these are absent) never became 'DKM' as she/he wasn't completed, so her looks are open for free interpretation. Using the 1945 Prinz Eugen would be a good starting point.
"I've heard there's a wicked war a-blazing, and the taste of war I know so very well
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023
Even now I see the foreign flag a-raising, their guns on fire as we sail into hell"
Roger Whittaker +9/13/2023
-
Falcon02
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:56 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Ive just started my 1:350 trumpeter Prinz Eugen with the Flyhawk PE kit and im having some issues interpreting Flyhawks instructions.
Is someone able to explain how the torpedo reload tracks are to be fitted?
the Instructions show parts 17 & 19 as curved, yet they are straight on the fret, do these need to be bent? and i cant for the life of me work out how the assembly is then attached to the deck itself (after removing the existing molded track)
Is someone able to explain how the torpedo reload tracks are to be fitted?
the Instructions show parts 17 & 19 as curved, yet they are straight on the fret, do these need to be bent? and i cant for the life of me work out how the assembly is then attached to the deck itself (after removing the existing molded track)
- Dan Banks
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Hipper and Blucher had a different airplane hanger than Prinz. I have never seen a photo or diagram of how the first ships hangers opened. Couldn�t slide forwards into the funnel, or backwards into the catapult? maybe hinged on each side, split in the middle and swung open like a clamshell?
-
Kikka
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 9:09 am
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Hi , I was planning on building a 700 A.H/P.E and wondering what are the general opinions on the kits available ? Is there a most accurate one ? What upgrades to use for it ? Or are there simple fixes / replacement ?
Thanks .
Thanks .
-
rvuorenr
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:36 am
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
Slowly advancing in my build of PE but now stuck on finding information of the fire control and other control equipment on deck. I mean these small machines with optics, to steer the flak, torpedos, search lights etc.
Any sources for this?
Any sources for this?
-
rvuorenr
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:36 am
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
To start with, I would like know what these are. I have some sources telling the following:
1. Torpedo directing unit
2. Zielsaule C/38 night director
3. ?
4. ?
5. ?
6. in Trumpeters model looks like here should be binoculars
7. Looks like ZAG flak director
1. Torpedo directing unit
2. Zielsaule C/38 night director
3. ?
4. ?
5. ?
6. in Trumpeters model looks like here should be binoculars
7. Looks like ZAG flak director
-
rvuorenr
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:36 am
Re: Calling all Prinz Eugen/Admiral Hipper class fans
In this picture we can see bioculars and on the right side I think ZAG flak director. I can't figure where this picture is taken, somewhere aft...
